GHSA-5F32-8637-HCRG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-14 21:31Description
Dependency artifacts uploaded with storm jar --artifacts were stored under a blob key derived only from
the Maven coordinate, for example dep---.jar. The key was therefore identical
for every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader
caught KeyAlreadyExistsException and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob's content
or owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.
A user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter of the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another tenant's topology.
This affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the --artifacts
dependency feature is used.
Mitigation
Upgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a pre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.
Note that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not
close this; every client that runs storm jar --artifacts must also be upgraded. Operators should audit
existing dep- blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should
avoid the --artifacts mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology
jar instead.
Credit
The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-82428"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-14T15:17:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Description\n\nDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\nthe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\nfor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\ncaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\nor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\n\nA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\nof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\ntenant\u0027s topology.\n\nThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\ndependency feature is used.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\npre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\n\nNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\nclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\nexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\navoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\njar instead.\n\nCredit\n\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.",
"id": "GHSA-5f32-8637-hcrg",
"modified": "2026-09-14T21:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-09-14T15:32:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pj3fspp4l10fgk2jkvrnqsmxycmjv622"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.