GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5F32-8637-HCRG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-09-14 21:31
VLAI
Details

Description

Dependency artifacts uploaded with storm jar --artifacts were stored under a blob key derived only from the Maven coordinate, for example dep---.jar. The key was therefore identical for every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader caught KeyAlreadyExistsException and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob's content or owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.

A user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter of the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another tenant's topology.

This affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the --artifacts dependency feature is used.

Mitigation

Upgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a pre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.

Note that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not close this; every client that runs storm jar --artifacts must also be upgraded. Operators should audit existing dep- blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should avoid the --artifacts mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology jar instead.

Credit

The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-82428"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-14T15:17:09Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Description\n\nDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\nthe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\nfor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\ncaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\nor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\n\nA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\nof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\ntenant\u0027s topology.\n\nThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\ndependency feature is used.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\npre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\n\nNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\nclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\nexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\navoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\njar instead.\n\nCredit\n\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.",
  "id": "GHSA-5f32-8637-hcrg",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T21:31:38Z",
  "published": "2026-09-14T15:32:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82428"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pj3fspp4l10fgk2jkvrnqsmxycmjv622"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…