CVE-2026-82428 (GCVE-0-2026-82428)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 14:18 – Updated: 2026-09-14 19:59
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Apache Storm Client: Cross-Tenant Dependency Jar Substitution via Predictable Blob Keys
Summary
Description
Dependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from
the Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical
for every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader
caught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob's content
or owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.
A user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter
of the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another
tenant's topology.
This affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`
dependency feature is used.
Mitigation
Upgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a
pre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.
Note that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not
close this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit
existing `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should
avoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology
jar instead.
Credit
The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 19:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Storm Client |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.1.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T15:13:41.895Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/8"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82428",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T19:58:03.203886Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:59:04.884Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.storm:storm-client",
"product": "Apache Storm Client",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "The ASF using Claude Agents"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cb\u003eDescription\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\u003cbr\u003ethe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\u003cbr\u003efor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\u003cbr\u003ecaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\u003cbr\u003eor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\u003cbr\u003eof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\u003cbr\u003etenant\u0027s topology.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\u003cbr\u003edependency feature is used.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\u003cbr\u003epre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\u003cbr\u003eclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\u003cbr\u003eexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\u003cbr\u003eavoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\u003cbr\u003ejar instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCredit\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Description\n\nDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\nthe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\nfor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\ncaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\nor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\n\nA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\nof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\ntenant\u0027s topology.\n\nThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\ndependency feature is used.\n\nMitigation\n\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\npre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\n\nNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\nclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\nexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\navoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\njar instead.\n\nCredit\n\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T14:18:09.921Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pj3fspp4l10fgk2jkvrnqsmxycmjv622"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Storm Client: Cross-Tenant Dependency Jar Substitution via Predictable Blob Keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82428",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T14:18:09.921Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-29T10:09:55.176Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T19:59:04.884Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82428",
"date": "2026-09-16",
"epss": "0.00693",
"percentile": "0.5119"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-82428\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2026-09-14T15:17:09.673\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-14T20:58:48.430\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Description\\n\\nDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\\nthe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\\nfor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\\ncaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\\nor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\\n\\nA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\\nof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\\ntenant\u0027s topology.\\n\\nThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\\ndependency feature is used.\\n\\nMitigation\\n\\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\\npre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\\n\\nNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\\nclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\\nexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\\navoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\\njar instead.\\n\\nCredit\\n\\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Apache Software Foundation\",\"product\":\"Apache Storm Client\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\",\"packageName\":\"org.apache.storm:storm-client\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"3.0.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.1.0\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-14T19:58:03.203886Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-82428\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread/pj3fspp4l10fgk2jkvrnqsmxycmjv622\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/8\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"shortName\": \"apache\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T14:18:09.921Z\"}, \"title\": \"Apache Storm Client: Cross-Tenant Dependency Jar Substitution via Predictable Blob Keys\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Apache Software Foundation\", \"product\": \"Apache Storm Client\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\", \"packageName\": \"org.apache.storm:storm-client\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.1.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"value\": \"Description\\n\\nDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\\nthe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\\nfor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\\ncaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\\nor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\\n\\nA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\\nof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\\ntenant\u0027s topology.\\n\\nThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\\ndependency feature is used.\\n\\nMitigation\\n\\nUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\\npre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\\n\\nNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\\nclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\\nexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\\navoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\\njar instead.\\n\\nCredit\\n\\nThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"base64\": false, \"value\": \"\u003cb\u003eDescription\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from\u003cbr\u003ethe Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical\u003cbr\u003efor every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader\u003cbr\u003ecaught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob\u0027s content\u003cbr\u003eor owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter\u003cbr\u003eof the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another\u003cbr\u003etenant\u0027s topology.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`\u003cbr\u003edependency feature is used.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eMitigation\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUpgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a\u003cbr\u003epre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not\u003cbr\u003eclose this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit\u003cbr\u003eexisting `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should\u003cbr\u003eavoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology\u003cbr\u003ejar instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eCredit\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.\u003cbr\u003e\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://lists.apache.org/thread/pj3fspp4l10fgk2jkvrnqsmxycmjv622\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"Textual description of severity\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"important\"}}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The ASF using Claude Agents\", \"type\": \"finder\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.3\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/8\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T15:13:41.895Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-82428\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-14T19:58:03.203886Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T19:59:00.512Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-82428\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"apache\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-08-29T10:09:55.176Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-14T14:18:09.921Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T19:59:04.884Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…