CVE-2026-53514 (GCVE-0-2026-53514)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-15 17:30 – Updated: 2026-07-15 17:30
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Better Auth: Unauthorized invitation acceptance via unverified email match in organization plugin
Summary
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, and in 1.6.14 and later when invitation IDs can be obtained outside the invited mailbox and requireEmailVerificationOnInvitation: true is not enabled, the organization plugin's acceptInvitation, rejectInvitation, getInvitation, and listUserInvitations recipient endpoints use session.user.email and an invitation ID without sufficient verified-email ownership proof, allowing a user with an unverified session for the invited email address to accept an organization invitation after obtaining the invitation ID. This issue is fixed for the original default behavior in version 1.6.11, while 1.6.14 restored compatibility for built-in opaque invitation IDs and leaves affected configurations requiring secure options.
Severity
7.7 (High)
CWE
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9577 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| better-auth | better-auth |
Affected:
< 1.6.11
|
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "better-auth",
"vendor": "better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.6.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, and in 1.6.14 and later when invitation IDs can be obtained outside the invited mailbox and requireEmailVerificationOnInvitation: true is not enabled, the organization plugin\u0027s acceptInvitation, rejectInvitation, getInvitation, and listUserInvitations recipient endpoints use session.user.email and an invitation ID without sufficient verified-email ownership proof, allowing a user with an unverified session for the invited email address to accept an organization invitation after obtaining the invitation ID. This issue is fixed for the original default behavior in version 1.6.11, while 1.6.14 restored compatibility for built-in opaque invitation IDs and leaves affected configurations requiring secure options."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-287",
"description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-441",
"description": "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary (\u0027Confused Deputy\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T17:30:46.069Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-fmh4-wcc4-5jm3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-fmh4-wcc4-5jm3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9577",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9577"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/23094a628f007f801be6d26e5b15dc5fc6fc4eb8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/23094a628f007f801be6d26e5b15dc5fc6fc4eb8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-fmh4-wcc4-5jm3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Better Auth: Unauthorized invitation acceptance via unverified email match in organization plugin"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53514",
"datePublished": "2026-07-15T17:30:46.069Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-09T17:30:33.456Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T17:30:46.069Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-53514",
"date": "2026-06-14",
"epss": "0.00016",
"percentile": "0.03657"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-53514\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-15T18:16:47.683\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-15T20:29:17.680\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Undergoing Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, and in 1.6.14 and later when invitation IDs can be obtained outside the invited mailbox and requireEmailVerificationOnInvitation: true is not enabled, the organization plugin\u0027s acceptInvitation, rejectInvitation, getInvitation, and listUserInvitations recipient endpoints use session.user.email and an invitation ID without sufficient verified-email ownership proof, allowing a user with an unverified session for the invited email address to accept an organization invitation after obtaining the invitation ID. This issue is fixed for the original default behavior in version 1.6.11, while 1.6.14 restored compatibility for built-in opaque invitation IDs and leaves affected configurations requiring secure options.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"better-auth\",\"product\":\"better-auth\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.6.11\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.3,\"impactScore\":5.8}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-287\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-441\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-862\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/23094a628f007f801be6d26e5b15dc5fc6fc4eb8\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9577\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-fmh4-wcc4-5jm3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…