Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0606
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-15 - Updated: 2026-05-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Cognos Analytics | Cognos Analytics versions 11.2.x sans le correctif de sécurité Fix Pack 7 | ||
| IBM | N/A | Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak versions 30.0.x antérieures à 30.0.2 | ||
| IBM | Cognos Analytics | Cognos Analytics versions 12.1.x antérieures à 12.1.2 | ||
| IBM | N/A | Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak versions 23.0.x antérieures à 23.0.20.6 | ||
| IBM | AIX | Open SDK for Rust on AIX versions 1.90.0.0 et 1.92.0.0 sans le correctif de sécurité Fix Pack 1 | ||
| IBM | Cognos Analytics | Cognos Analytics versions 12.0.x sans le correctif de sécurité Fix Pack 2 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Cognos Analytics versions 11.2.x sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Fix Pack 7",
"product": {
"name": "Cognos Analytics",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak versions 30.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 30.0.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cognos Analytics versions 12.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 12.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Cognos Analytics",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak versions 23.0.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 23.0.20.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Open SDK for Rust on AIX versions 1.90.0.0 et 1.92.0.0 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Fix Pack 1",
"product": {
"name": "AIX",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Cognos Analytics versions 12.0.x sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Fix Pack 2",
"product": {
"name": "Cognos Analytics",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-56200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-56200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-29371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-29371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36126"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0606",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Falsification de requ\u00eates c\u00f4t\u00e9 serveur (SSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits IBM",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7272628",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7272628"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7272965",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7272965"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7272446",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7272446"
}
]
}
CVE-2024-12798 (GCVE-0-2024-12798)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-19 15:14 – Updated: 2025-01-03 13:38
VLAI
EPSS
Title
JaninoEventEvaluator vulnerability
Summary
ACE vulnerability in JaninoEventEvaluator by QOS.CH logback-core
upto including version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 in Java applications allows
attacker to execute arbitrary code by compromising an existing
logback configuration file or by injecting an environment variable
before program execution.
Malicious logback configuration files can allow the attacker to execute
arbitrary code using the JaninoEventEvaluator extension.
A successful attack requires the user to have write access to a
configuration file. Alternatively, the attacker could inject a malicious
environment variable pointing to a malicious configuration file. In both
cases, the attack requires existing privilege.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-917 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QOS.CH Sarl | Logback-core |
Affected:
0.1 , ≤ 1.3.14
(maven)
Affected: 1.4.0 , ≤ 1.5.12 (maven) Unaffected: 1.3.15 Unaffected: 1.5.13 |
Credits
7asecurity
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12798",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-20T20:17:18.406704Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-20T20:17:33.360Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"logback-core"
],
"product": "Logback-core",
"vendor": "QOS.CH Sarl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.5.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.3.15"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.5.13"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "7asecurity"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eACE vulnerability in JaninoEventEvaluator by QOS.CH logback-core\n upto including version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and\u0026nbsp;1.4.0 to 1.5.12 in Java applications allows\n attacker to execute arbitrary code by compromising an existing\n logback configuration file or by injecting an environment variable\n before program execution.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eMalicious logback configuration files can allow the attacker to execute \narbitrary code using the JaninoEventEvaluator extension.\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003eA successful attack requires the user to have write access to a \nconfiguration file. Alternatively, the attacker could inject a malicious \nenvironment variable pointing to a malicious configuration file. In both \ncases, the attack requires existing privilege.\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "ACE vulnerability in JaninoEventEvaluator by QOS.CH logback-core\n upto including version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and\u00a01.4.0 to 1.5.12 in Java applications allows\n attacker to execute arbitrary code by compromising an existing\n logback configuration file or by injecting an environment variable\n before program execution.\n\n\n\n\n\nMalicious logback configuration files can allow the attacker to execute \narbitrary code using the JaninoEventEvaluator extension.\n\n\n\nA successful attack requires the user to have write access to a \nconfiguration file. Alternatively, the attacker could inject a malicious \nenvironment variable pointing to a malicious configuration file. In both \ncases, the attack requires existing privilege."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No known exploitation\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "No known exploitation"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:L/SI:H/SA:L/RE:L/U:Clear",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-917",
"description": "CWE-917 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement (\u0027Expression Language Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-03T13:38:58.152Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://logback.qos.ch/news.html#1.5.13"
},
{
"url": "https://logback.qos.ch/news.html#1.3.15"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Remove Janino from the Java classpath. Alternatively, update to logback \nversion 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x series, update to \nlogback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x series remains \nvulnerable."
}
],
"value": "Remove Janino from the Java classpath. Alternatively, update to logback \nversion 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x series, update to \nlogback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x series remains \nvulnerable."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "JaninoEventEvaluator\u00a0vulnerability",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Remove Janino from the Java classpath. Alternatively, update to logback \nversion 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x series, update to \nlogback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x series remains \nvulnerable."
}
],
"value": "Remove Janino from the Java classpath. Alternatively, update to logback \nversion 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x series, update to \nlogback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x series remains \nvulnerable."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12798",
"datePublished": "2024-12-19T15:14:21.598Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-19T14:21:00.178Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-03T13:38:58.152Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-12801 (GCVE-0-2024-12801)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-19 16:11 – Updated: 2025-01-03 13:40
VLAI
EPSS
Title
SaxEventRecorder vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to
forge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML.
The attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in XML configuration files.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| QOS.CH Sarl | logback |
Affected:
0.1 , ≤ 1.3.14
(maven)
Affected: 1.4.0 , ≤ 1.5.12 (maven) Unaffected: 1.3.15 Unaffected: 1.5.13 |
Credits
7asecurity
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12801",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-20T20:15:51.883590Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-20T20:16:07.566Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"XML configuration component"
],
"platforms": [
"Java"
],
"product": "logback",
"vendor": "QOS.CH Sarl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.5.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.3.15"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.5.13"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The attacker needs to access and write to logback configuration files. Alternatively, the attacker needs to be able to force the use of a malicious logback configuration file at application start.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The attacker needs to access and write to logback configuration files. Alternatively, the attacker needs to be able to force the use of a malicious logback configuration file at application start."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "7asecurity"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cdiv\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12\u0026nbsp; on the Java platform, allows an attacker to \nforge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in\u0026nbsp; XML configuration files.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12\u00a0 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to \nforge requests by compromising logback configuration files in XML.\n\n\n\nThe attacks involves the modification of DOCTYPE declaration in\u00a0 XML configuration files."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No known existing exploitation.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "No known existing exploitation."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-212",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-212 Functionality Misuse"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 2.4,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "CLEAR",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "DIFFUSE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/V:D/U:Clear",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-03T13:40:41.135Z",
"orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"shortName": "NCSC.ch"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://logback.qos.ch/news.html#1.5.13"
},
{
"url": "https://logback.qos.ch/news.html#1.3.15"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update to logback version 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x \nseries, update to logback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x \nseries remains vulnerable.\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Update to logback version 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x \nseries, update to logback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x \nseries remains vulnerable."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "SaxEventRecorder vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Update to logback version 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x \nseries, update to logback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x \nseries remains vulnerable."
}
],
"value": "Update to logback version 1.5.13 or later. If you are using the 1.3.x \nseries, update to logback version 1.3.15 or later. Note that the 1.4.x \nseries remains vulnerable."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
"assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12801",
"datePublished": "2024-12-19T16:11:50.044Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-19T16:09:59.761Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-03T13:40:41.135Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-29371 (GCVE-0-2024-29371)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-17 00:00 – Updated: 2026-01-23 19:28
VLAI
EPSS
Summary
In jose4j before 0.9.6, an attacker can cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition by crafting a malicious JSON Web Encryption (JWE) token with an exceptionally high compression ratio. When this token is processed by the server, it results in significant memory allocation and processing time during decompression.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
1 reference
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-29371",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-17T18:38:20.096134Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1259",
"description": "CWE-1259 Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-17T18:48:36.126Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/issues/220/vuln-zip-bomb-attack"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In jose4j before 0.9.6, an attacker can cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition by crafting a malicious JSON Web Encryption (JWE) token with an exceptionally high compression ratio. When this token is processed by the server, it results in significant memory allocation and processing time during decompression."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-23T19:28:10.386Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/issues/220/vuln-zip-bomb-attack"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-29371",
"datePublished": "2025-12-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-03-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-23T19:28:10.386Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-35195 (GCVE-0-2024-35195)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-20 20:14 – Updated: 2025-07-31 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False
Summary
Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0.
Severity
5.6 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisori… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6655 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/a58d7f2ffb… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/pac… | |
| https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/pac… |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:request_project:request:2.32.0:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "request",
"vendor": "request_project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.32.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-35195",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-30T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-31T03:56:03.717Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T03:07:46.774Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisories/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisories/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6655",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6655"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/a58d7f2ffb4d00b46dca2d70a3932a0b37e22fac",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/a58d7f2ffb4d00b46dca2d70a3932a0b37e22fac"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IYLSNK5TL46Q6XPRVMHVWS63MVJQOK4Q/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/N7WP6EYDSUOCOJYHDK5NX43PYZ4SNHGZ/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "requests",
"vendor": "psf",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.32.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Requests is a HTTP library. Prior to 2.32.0, when making requests through a Requests `Session`, if the first request is made with `verify=False` to disable cert verification, all subsequent requests to the same host will continue to ignore cert verification regardless of changes to the value of `verify`. This behavior will continue for the lifecycle of the connection in the connection pool. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.32.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-10T16:09:17.143Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisories/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/security/advisories/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6655",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6655"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/a58d7f2ffb4d00b46dca2d70a3932a0b37e22fac",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/psf/requests/commit/a58d7f2ffb4d00b46dca2d70a3932a0b37e22fac"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IYLSNK5TL46Q6XPRVMHVWS63MVJQOK4Q/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/N7WP6EYDSUOCOJYHDK5NX43PYZ4SNHGZ/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-35195",
"datePublished": "2024-05-20T20:14:48.206Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-10T14:24:24.342Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-31T03:56:03.717Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-5535 (GCVE-0-2024-5535)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-27 10:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 11:35
VLAI
EPSS
Title
SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread
Summary
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an
empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to
be sent to the peer.
Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences
such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue
could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent
to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications
that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of
supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never
be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by
accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling
application.
The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS
applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN
(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and
is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more
widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of
protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns
the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the
client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the
first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap
between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is
called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and
returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports
that there was no overlap in the lists).
This function is typically called from a server side application callback for
ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list
of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in
length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never
normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the
SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list
supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the
application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has
accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has
accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len
parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap"
response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it
will be vulnerable to this problem.
In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select
a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol
in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes
from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.
However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a
client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the
application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of
confidentiality will occur.
This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most
likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not
widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.
Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active
exploitation unlikely.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of
OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they
become available.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-125 - Out-of-bounds Read
Assigner
References
7 references
Impacted products
Date Public
2024-06-26 23:00
Credits
Joseph Birr-Pixton
David Benjamin (Google)
Matt Caswell
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1za",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zk",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5535",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-14T04:55:17.007Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:32:30.900Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1za git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zk git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/15/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0010/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241025-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "RUGGEDCOM RST2428P",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIDIS Prime",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V4.0.700",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:35:07.079Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-915275.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1za",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zk",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Joseph Birr-Pixton"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-26T23:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an\u003cbr\u003eempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to\u003cbr\u003ebe sent to the peer.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences\u003cbr\u003esuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue\u003cbr\u003ecould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent\u003cbr\u003eto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications\u003cbr\u003ethat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of\u003cbr\u003esupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never\u003cbr\u003ebe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by\u003cbr\u003eaccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling\u003cbr\u003eapplication.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS\u003cbr\u003eapplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN\u003cbr\u003e(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and\u003cbr\u003eis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more\u003cbr\u003ewidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of\u003cbr\u003eprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns\u003cbr\u003ethe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the\u003cbr\u003eclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the\u003cbr\u003efirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap\u003cbr\u003ebetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is\u003cbr\u003ecalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and\u003cbr\u003ereturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports\u003cbr\u003ethat there was no overlap in the lists).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis function is typically called from a server side application callback for\u003cbr\u003eALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list\u003cbr\u003eof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in\u003cbr\u003elength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never\u003cbr\u003enormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the\u003cbr\u003eSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list\u003cbr\u003esupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the\u003cbr\u003eapplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has\u003cbr\u003eaccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has\u003cbr\u003eaccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len\u003cbr\u003eparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a \"no overlap\"\u003cbr\u003eresponse (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it\u003cbr\u003ewill be vulnerable to this problem.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select\u003cbr\u003ea protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol\u003cbr\u003ein the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes\u003cbr\u003efrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.\u003cbr\u003eHowever if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a\u003cbr\u003eclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the\u003cbr\u003eapplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of\u003cbr\u003econfidentiality will occur.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most\u003cbr\u003elikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not\u003cbr\u003ewidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.\u003cbr\u003eFinally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active\u003cbr\u003eexploitation unlikely.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\nDue to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they\u003cbr\u003ebecome available."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an\nempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to\nbe sent to the peer.\n\nImpact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences\nsuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue\ncould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent\nto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications\nthat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of\nsupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never\nbe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by\naccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling\napplication.\n\nThe OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS\napplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN\n(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and\nis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more\nwidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of\nprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns\nthe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the\nclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the\nfirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap\nbetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is\ncalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and\nreturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports\nthat there was no overlap in the lists).\n\nThis function is typically called from a server side application callback for\nALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list\nof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in\nlength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never\nnormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the\nSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list\nsupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the\napplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has\naccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has\naccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len\nparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a \"no overlap\"\nresponse (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it\nwill be vulnerable to this problem.\n\nIn the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select\na protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol\nin the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes\nfrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.\nHowever if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a\nclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the\napplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of\nconfidentiality will occur.\n\nThis issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most\nlikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not\nwidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.\nFinally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active\nexploitation unlikely.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.\n\nDue to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of\nOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they\nbecome available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T08:29:27.594Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1za git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zk git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5535",
"datePublished": "2024-06-27T10:30:53.118Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-30T15:34:36.813Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T11:35:07.079Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-56339 (GCVE-0-2024-56339)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-07 16:03 – Updated: 2025-08-07 16:29
VLAI
EPSS
Title
IBM WebSphere Application Server information disclosure
Summary
IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor security configuration.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239955 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server |
Affected:
9.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server Liberty |
Affected:
17.0.0.3 , ≤ 25.0.0.7
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:17.0.0.3:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:25.0.0.7:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-56339",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-07T16:29:27.157409Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T16:29:34.336Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "WebSphere Application Server",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:17.0.0.3:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:25.0.0.7:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "WebSphere Application Server Liberty",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "25.0.0.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0.0.3",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7\u0026nbsp;could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor security configuration."
}
],
"value": "IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7\u00a0could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor security configuration."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-650",
"description": "CWE-650",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T16:11:38.908Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7239955"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "For IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 - 25.0.0.7 using the servlet-3.1, servlet-4.0, servlet-5.0 or servlet-6.0 feature:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH64682 \u003cbr\u003e--OR--\u003cbr\u003e\u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 25.0.0.8 or later (targeted availability 3Q2025).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor IBM WebSphere Application Server traditional:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFor V9.0.0.0 through 9.0.5.24:\u003cbr\u003e\u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH64683 \u003cbr\u003e--OR--\u003cbr\u003e\u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 9.0.5.26 or later (targeted availability 4Q2025). \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAdditional interim fixes may be available and linked off the interim fix download page.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "For IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 - 25.0.0.7 using the servlet-3.1, servlet-4.0, servlet-5.0 or servlet-6.0 feature:\n\n\u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH64682 \n--OR--\n\u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 25.0.0.8 or later (targeted availability 3Q2025).\n\nFor IBM WebSphere Application Server traditional:\n\nFor V9.0.0.0 through 9.0.5.24:\n\u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH64683 \n--OR--\n\u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 9.0.5.26 or later (targeted availability 4Q2025). \n\n \n\nAdditional interim fixes may be available and linked off the interim fix download page."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "IBM WebSphere Application Server information disclosure",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-56339",
"datePublished": "2025-08-07T16:03:05.256Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-20T13:55:07.212Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-07T16:29:34.336Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-6839 (GCVE-0-2024-6839)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-20 10:09 – Updated: 2025-11-03 19:34
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Improper Regex Path Matching in corydolphin/flask-cors
Summary
corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.0.1 contains an improper regex path matching vulnerability. The plugin prioritizes longer regex patterns over more specific ones when matching paths, which can lead to less restrictive CORS policies being applied to sensitive endpoints. This mismatch in regex pattern priority allows unauthorized cross-origin access to sensitive data or functionality, potentially exposing confidential information and increasing the risk of unauthorized actions by malicious actors.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-41 - Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| corydolphin | corydolphin/flask-cors |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ latest
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6839",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-20T17:50:23.065543Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:35:47.526Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:39.531Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00049.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "corydolphin/flask-cors",
"vendor": "corydolphin",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.0.1 contains an improper regex path matching vulnerability. The plugin prioritizes longer regex patterns over more specific ones when matching paths, which can lead to less restrictive CORS policies being applied to sensitive endpoints. This mismatch in regex pattern priority allows unauthorized cross-origin access to sensitive data or functionality, potentially exposing confidential information and increasing the risk of unauthorized actions by malicious actors."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-41",
"description": "CWE-41 Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T10:09:42.595Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/403eb1fc-86f4-4820-8eba-0f3dfae9f2b4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "403eb1fc-86f4-4820-8eba-0f3dfae9f2b4",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Improper Regex Path Matching in corydolphin/flask-cors"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6839",
"datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:09:42.595Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-17T17:48:41.089Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:39.531Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-6844 (GCVE-0-2024-6844)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-20 10:10 – Updated: 2025-11-03 19:34
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Inconsistent CORS Matching Due to Handling of '+' in URL Path in corydolphin/flask-cors
Summary
A vulnerability in corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.0.1 allows for inconsistent CORS matching due to the handling of the '+' character in URL paths. The request.path is passed through the unquote_plus function, which converts the '+' character to a space ' '. This behavior leads to incorrect path normalization, causing potential mismatches in CORS configuration. As a result, endpoints may not be matched correctly to their CORS settings, leading to unexpected CORS policy application. This can cause unauthorized cross-origin access or block valid requests, creating security vulnerabilities and usability issues.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-346 - Origin Validation Error
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| corydolphin | corydolphin/flask-cors |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ latest
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6844",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-20T14:26:13.854401Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T14:26:19.456Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:40.918Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00049.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "corydolphin/flask-cors",
"vendor": "corydolphin",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.0.1 allows for inconsistent CORS matching due to the handling of the \u0027+\u0027 character in URL paths. The request.path is passed through the unquote_plus function, which converts the \u0027+\u0027 character to a space \u0027 \u0027. This behavior leads to incorrect path normalization, causing potential mismatches in CORS configuration. As a result, endpoints may not be matched correctly to their CORS settings, leading to unexpected CORS policy application. This can cause unauthorized cross-origin access or block valid requests, creating security vulnerabilities and usability issues."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-346",
"description": "CWE-346 Origin Validation Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T12:50:34.011Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/731a6cd4-d05f-4fe6-8f5b-fe088d7b34e0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "731a6cd4-d05f-4fe6-8f5b-fe088d7b34e0",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Inconsistent CORS Matching Due to Handling of \u0027+\u0027 in URL Path in corydolphin/flask-cors"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6844",
"datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:10:51.818Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-17T18:28:09.292Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:40.918Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-6866 (GCVE-0-2024-6866)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-20 10:10 – Updated: 2025-11-03 19:34
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Case-Insensitive Path Matching in corydolphin/flask-cors
Summary
corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.01 contains a vulnerability where the request path matching is case-insensitive due to the use of the `try_match` function, which is originally intended for matching hosts. This results in a mismatch because paths in URLs are case-sensitive, but the regex matching treats them as case-insensitive. This misconfiguration can lead to significant security vulnerabilities, allowing unauthorized origins to access paths meant to be restricted, resulting in data exposure and potential data leaks.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-178 - Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| corydolphin | corydolphin/flask-cors |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ latest
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6866",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-20T17:47:43.885682Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T18:14:35.722Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:42.290Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00049.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "corydolphin/flask-cors",
"vendor": "corydolphin",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "latest",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "corydolphin/flask-cors version 4.01 contains a vulnerability where the request path matching is case-insensitive due to the use of the `try_match` function, which is originally intended for matching hosts. This results in a mismatch because paths in URLs are case-sensitive, but the regex matching treats them as case-insensitive. This misconfiguration can lead to significant security vulnerabilities, allowing unauthorized origins to access paths meant to be restricted, resulting in data exposure and potential data leaks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-178",
"description": "CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T10:10:59.521Z",
"orgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"shortName": "@huntr_ai"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/808c11af-faee-43a8-824b-b5ab4f62b9e6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "808c11af-faee-43a8-824b-b5ab4f62b9e6",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Case-Insensitive Path Matching in corydolphin/flask-cors"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c09c270a-b464-47c1-9133-acb35b22c19a",
"assignerShortName": "@huntr_ai",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6866",
"datePublished": "2025-03-20T10:10:59.521Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-17T21:09:41.423Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:34:42.290Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-12635 (GCVE-0-2025-12635)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-08 21:58 – Updated: 2025-12-09 16:05
VLAI
EPSS
Title
IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty Cross-Site Scripting
Summary
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.12 are affected by cross-site scripting due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a specially crafted URL to redirect the user to a malicious site.
Severity
5.4 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7254078 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server |
Affected:
9.0 , ≤ 2.0.18
(semver)
Affected: 8.5 cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| IBM | WebSphere Application Server Liberty |
Affected:
17.0.0.3 , ≤ 25.0.0.12
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:17.0.0.3:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:25.0.0.12:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12635",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-09T15:24:21.240209Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T16:05:14.945Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "WebSphere Application Server",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.5"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:17.0.0.3:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:25.0.0.12:*:*:*:liberty:*:*:*"
],
"product": "WebSphere Application Server Liberty",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "25.0.0.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0.0.3",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.12 are affected by cross-site scripting due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a specially crafted URL to redirect the user to a malicious site.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.12 are affected by cross-site scripting due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a specially crafted URL to redirect the user to a malicious site."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-08T21:58:13.798Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7254078"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRemediation/Fixes IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by applying a currently available interim fix or fix pack that contains the fix for APAR PH68817 and PH68243. To determine if a feature is enabled for WebSphere Application Server Liberty, refer to How to determine if Liberty is using a specific feature . For IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 - 25.0.0.12 using the servlet-3.0, servlet-3.1, servlet-4.0, servlet-5.0, or servlet-6.0 feature: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH68817 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 26.0.0.1 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). For IBM WebSphere Application Server traditional: For V9.0.0.0 through 9.0.5.26: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH68243 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 9.0.5.27 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). For V8.5.0.0 through 8.5.5.28: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by interim fix and then apply Interim Fix that resolves PH68243 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 8.5.5.29 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). Additional interim fixes may be available and linked off the interim fix download page.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Remediation/Fixes IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by applying a currently available interim fix or fix pack that contains the fix for APAR PH68817 and PH68243. To determine if a feature is enabled for WebSphere Application Server Liberty, refer to How to determine if Liberty is using a specific feature . For IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 - 25.0.0.12 using the servlet-3.0, servlet-3.1, servlet-4.0, servlet-5.0, or servlet-6.0 feature: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH68817 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 26.0.0.1 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). For IBM WebSphere Application Server traditional: For V9.0.0.0 through 9.0.5.26: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by the interim fix and then apply the Interim Fix that resolves PH68243 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 9.0.5.27 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). For V8.5.0.0 through 8.5.5.28: \u00b7 Upgrade to minimal fix pack levels as required by interim fix and then apply Interim Fix that resolves PH68243 --OR-- \u00b7 Apply Fix Pack 8.5.5.29 or later (targeted availability 1Q2026). Additional interim fixes may be available and linked off the interim fix download page."
}
],
"title": "IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty Cross-Site Scripting",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ibm-cvegen"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12635",
"datePublished": "2025-12-08T21:58:13.798Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-03T15:26:42.296Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T16:05:14.945Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Trend slope:
-
(linear fit over daily sighting counts)
Show additional events:
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…