Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CERTFR-2024-AVI-1046
Vulnerability from certfr_avis
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Tenable. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à la confidentialité des données, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable | Security Center | Security Center versions antérieures à 6.5.0 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Security Center versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.5.0",
"product": {
"name": "Security Center",
"vendor": {
"name": "Tenable",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2024-12-06T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2024-12-06T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-1046",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-12-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Tenable. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es, un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et un d\u00e9ni de service.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Tenable Security Center",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Tenable tns-2024-19",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2024-19"
}
]
}
CVE-2024-6119 (GCVE-0-2024-6119)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-09-03 15:58
Modified
2024-09-12 16:03
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-843 - Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')
Summary
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS
clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory
address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.
Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of
service.
Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking
server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when
comparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an
X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the
application program.
Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not
affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also
specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.
TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they
generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected
identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the
certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity
of the issue is Moderate.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/09/03/4"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-September/000303.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6119",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-03T20:20:39.935362Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T20:25:47.056Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-09-03T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\u003cbr\u003eclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\u003cbr\u003eaddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\u003cbr\u003eservice.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\u003cbr\u003eserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\u003cbr\u003ecomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\u003cbr\u003eX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\u003cbr\u003eapplication program.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\u003cbr\u003eaffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\u003cbr\u003especifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\u003cbr\u003egenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\u003cbr\u003eidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\u003cbr\u003ecertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\u003cbr\u003eof the issue is Moderate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS\nclients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory\naddress resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.\n\nImpact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of\nservice.\n\nApplications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking\nserver certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when\ncomparing the expected name with an `otherName` subject alternative name of an\nX.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the\napplication program.\n\nNote that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not\naffected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also\nspecifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.\n\nTLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they\ngenerally don\u0027t perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected\nidentity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the\ncertificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity\nof the issue is Moderate.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Moderate"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-843",
"description": "CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (\u0027Type Confusion\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7dfcee2cd2a63b2c64b9b4b0850be64cb695b0a0"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/05f360d9e849a1b277db628f1f13083a7f8dd04f"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/621f3729831b05ee828a3203eddb621d014ff2b2"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/06d1dc3fa96a2ba5a3e22735a033012aadc9f0d6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Possible denial of service in X.509 name checks",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6119",
"datePublished": "2024-09-03T15:58:06.970Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-18T09:24:11.739Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T16:03:01.704Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-5458 (GCVE-0-2024-5458)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-06-09 18:26
Modified
2025-03-14 14:13
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, due to a code logic error, filtering functions such as filter_var when validating URLs (FILTER_VALIDATE_URL) for certain types of URLs the function will result in invalid user information (username + password part of URLs) being treated as valid user information. This may lead to the downstream code accepting invalid URLs as valid and parsing them incorrectly.
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php:php:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.3.33",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.27",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.33",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.15",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.0.30",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "fedora",
"vendor": "fedoraproject",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "40"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5458",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-10T19:55:47.057816Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-14T14:13:20.514Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T21:11:12.787Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-w8qr-v226-r27w"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00009.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"modules": [
"filter"
],
"product": "PHP",
"programFiles": [
"ext/filter/logical_filters.c"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/php/php-src",
"vendor": "PHP Group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.*",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "c01l"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-09T18:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In PHP versions\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, due to a code logic error, filtering functions such as filter_var when validating URLs\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e(FILTER_VALIDATE_URL) for certain types of URLs the function will result in invalid user information (username + password part of URLs) being treated as valid user information. This may lead to the downstream code accepting invalid URLs as valid and parsing them incorrectly.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In PHP versions\u00a08.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, due to a code logic error, filtering functions such as filter_var when validating URLs\u00a0(FILTER_VALIDATE_URL) for certain types of URLs the function will result in invalid user information (username + password part of URLs) being treated as valid user information. This may lead to the downstream code accepting invalid URLs as valid and parsing them incorrectly."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-28T14:05:58.895Z",
"orgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"shortName": "php"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-w8qr-v226-r27w"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00009.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0001/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w8qr-v226-r27w",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Filter bypass in filter_var (FILTER_VALIDATE_URL)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"assignerShortName": "php",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5458",
"datePublished": "2024-06-09T18:26:28.804Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-29T00:23:37.703Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-14T14:13:20.514Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-4741 (GCVE-0-2024-4741)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-13 10:20
Modified
2024-11-13 14:49
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-416 - Use After Free
Summary
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause
memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such
as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.
However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are
affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not
vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by
applications.
The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used
when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected
to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have
been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.
The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the
network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.
In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only
been partially processed and the buffer is still in use.
The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has
been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of
this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer
is still in use.
While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a
malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.
We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4741",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-13T14:45:07.092438Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T14:49:05.977Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1y",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "William Ahern (Akamai)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Watson Ladd (Akamai)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-05-27T23:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\u003cbr\u003ememory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\u003cbr\u003eas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\u003cbr\u003eHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\u003cbr\u003eaffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\u003cbr\u003evulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\u003cbr\u003eapplications.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\u003cbr\u003ewhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\u003cbr\u003eto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\u003cbr\u003ebeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\u003cbr\u003enetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\u003cbr\u003eIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\u003cbr\u003ebeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\u003cbr\u003ebeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\u003cbr\u003ethis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\u003cbr\u003eis still in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\u003cbr\u003emalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\u003cbr\u003eWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause\nmemory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations\n\nImpact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such\nas the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code.\nHowever, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are\naffected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not\nvulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by\napplications.\n\nThe SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used\nwhen processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected\nto succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have\nbeen identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.\n\nThe first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the\nnetwork and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived.\nIn this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only\nbeen partially processed and the buffer is still in use.\n\nThe second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has\nbeen received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of\nthis data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer\nis still in use.\n\nWhile these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a\nmalicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs.\nWe are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-416",
"description": "CWE-416 Use After Free",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240528.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e5093133c35ca82874ad83697af76f4b0f7e3bd8"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c88c3de51020c37e8706bf7a682a162593053aac"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/704f725b96aa373ee45ecfb23f6abfe8be8d9177"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/b3f0eb0a295f58f16ba43ba99dad70d4ee5c437d"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1y git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/f7a045f3143fc6da2ee66bf52d8df04829590dd4"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4741",
"datePublished": "2024-11-13T10:20:50.711Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-10T09:56:11.310Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-13T14:49:05.977Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-4577 (GCVE-0-2024-4577)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-06-09 19:42
Modified
2025-07-30 01:37
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Summary
In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, when using Apache and PHP-CGI on Windows, if the system is set up to use certain code pages, Windows may use "Best-Fit" behavior to replace characters in command line given to Win32 API functions. PHP CGI module may misinterpret those characters as PHP options, which may allow a malicious user to pass options to PHP binary being run, and thus reveal the source code of scripts, run arbitrary PHP code on the server, etc.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php_group:php:8.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php_group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php_group:php:8.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php_group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php_group:php:8.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php_group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4577",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-06-15T03:55:28.430189Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2024-06-12",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-4577"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T01:37:01.605Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-06-12T00:00:00+00:00",
"value": "CVE-2024-4577 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-14T01:24:54.997Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/php-cgi-os-command-injection-vulnerability-cve-2024-4577"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/php-cgi-argument-injection-to-rce-cve-2024-4577"
},
{
"url": "https://blog.talosintelligence.com/new-persistent-attacks-japan/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-3qgc-jrrr-25jv"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://blog.orange.tw/2024/06/cve-2024-4577-yet-another-php-rce.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://devco.re/blog/2024/06/06/security-alert-cve-2024-4577-php-cgi-argument-injection-vulnerability-en/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/06/php-vulnerability-allows-attackers-to-run-malicious-code-on-windows-servers/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.imperva.com/blog/imperva-protects-against-critical-php-vulnerability-cve-2024-4577/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/11whoami99/CVE-2024-4577"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/xcanwin/CVE-2024-4577-PHP-RCE"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/19247"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://labs.watchtowr.com/no-way-php-strikes-again-cve-2024-4577/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/watchtowrlabs/CVE-2024-4577"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.1.29"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.2.20"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.3.8"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert.be/en/advisory/warning-php-remote-code-execution-patch-immediately"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://isc.sans.edu/diary/30994"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0008/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"modules": [
"CGI"
],
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "PHP",
"repo": "https://github.com/php/php-src",
"vendor": "PHP Group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.*",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "This problem is only present in Windows versions of PHP running in CGI mode, in systems where a codepage using \"Best Fit\" strategy is enabled.\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "This problem is only present in Windows versions of PHP running in CGI mode, in systems where a codepage using \"Best Fit\" strategy is enabled."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Orange Tsai, DEVCORE Research Team"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-09T19:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In PHP versions\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, when using Apache and PHP-CGI on Windows, if the system is set up to use certain code pages, Windows may use \"\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eBest-Fit\" behavior to replace characters in command line given to\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWin32 API functions. PHP CGI module may misinterpret those characters as PHP options, which may allow a malicious user to pass options to PHP binary being run, and thus reveal the source code of scripts, run arbitrary PHP code on the server, etc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In PHP versions\u00a08.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, when using Apache and PHP-CGI on Windows, if the system is set up to use certain code pages, Windows may use \"Best-Fit\" behavior to replace characters in command line given to\u00a0Win32 API functions. PHP CGI module may misinterpret those characters as PHP options, which may allow a malicious user to pass options to PHP binary being run, and thus reveal the source code of scripts, run arbitrary PHP code on the server, etc."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-21T19:08:41.387Z",
"orgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"shortName": "php"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-3qgc-jrrr-25jv"
},
{
"url": "https://blog.orange.tw/2024/06/cve-2024-4577-yet-another-php-rce.html"
},
{
"url": "https://devco.re/blog/2024/06/06/security-alert-cve-2024-4577-php-cgi-argument-injection-vulnerability-en/"
},
{
"url": "https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/06/php-vulnerability-allows-attackers-to-run-malicious-code-on-windows-servers/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.imperva.com/blog/imperva-protects-against-critical-php-vulnerability-cve-2024-4577/"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/11whoami99/CVE-2024-4577"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/xcanwin/CVE-2024-4577-PHP-RCE"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/19247"
},
{
"url": "https://labs.watchtowr.com/no-way-php-strikes-again-cve-2024-4577/"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/watchtowrlabs/CVE-2024-4577"
},
{
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.1.29"
},
{
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.2.20"
},
{
"url": "https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.3.8"
},
{
"url": "https://cert.be/en/advisory/warning-php-remote-code-execution-patch-immediately"
},
{
"url": "https://isc.sans.edu/diary/30994"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0008/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3qgc-jrrr-25jv",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Argument Injection in PHP-CGI",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"assignerShortName": "php",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4577",
"datePublished": "2024-06-09T19:42:36.464Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-06T22:21:01.742Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T01:37:01.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-4603 (GCVE-0-2024-4603)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-05-16 15:21
Modified
2024-10-14 14:56
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very
slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()
or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may
experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked
have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of
Service.
The functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform
various checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time
if the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.
Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using
public keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature
verification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit
the modulus size when performing the checks.
An application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
These functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so
only applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications
when using the `-check` option.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T20:47:41.528Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240516.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3559e868e58005d15c6013a0c1fd832e51c73397"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c39b3858091c152f52513c066ff2c5a47969f0d"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/da343d0605c826ef197aceedc67e8e04f065f740"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/53ea06486d296b890d565fb971b2764fcd826e7e"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-4603",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-16T18:27:25.638098Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-834",
"description": "CWE-834 Excessive Iteration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-13T15:11:57.009Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "OSS-Fuzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Tomas Mraz"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-05-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very\u003cbr\u003eslow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may\u003cbr\u003eexperience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked\u003cbr\u003ehave been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of\u003cbr\u003eService.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform\u003cbr\u003evarious checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time\u003cbr\u003eif the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTrying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using\u003cbr\u003epublic keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature\u003cbr\u003everification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit\u003cbr\u003ethe modulus size when performing the checks.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eand supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThese functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so\u003cbr\u003eonly applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the `-check` option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DSA keys or parameters may be very\nslow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions EVP_PKEY_param_check()\nor EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check a DSA public key or DSA parameters may\nexperience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked\nhave been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of\nService.\n\nThe functions EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() perform\nvarious checks on DSA parameters. Some of those computations take a long time\nif the modulus (`p` parameter) is too large.\n\nTrying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not allow using\npublic keys with a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length for signature\nverification. However the key and parameter check functions do not limit\nthe modulus size when performing the checks.\n\nAn application that calls EVP_PKEY_param_check() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nand supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThese functions are not called by OpenSSL itself on untrusted DSA keys so\nonly applications that directly call these functions may be vulnerable.\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the `-check` option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:56:01.784Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240516.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.14 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3559e868e58005d15c6013a0c1fd832e51c73397"
},
{
"name": "3.1.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9c39b3858091c152f52513c066ff2c5a47969f0d"
},
{
"name": "3.2.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/da343d0605c826ef197aceedc67e8e04f065f740"
},
{
"name": "3.3.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/53ea06486d296b890d565fb971b2764fcd826e7e"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent checking DSA keys and parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-4603",
"datePublished": "2024-05-16T15:21:20.050Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-07T11:44:02.196Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:56:01.784Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-49582 (GCVE-0-2023-49582)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-08-26 14:03
Modified
2025-03-13 14:25
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-732 - Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
Summary
Lax permissions set by the Apache Portable Runtime library on Unix platforms would allow local users read access to named shared memory segments, potentially revealing sensitive application data.
This issue does not affect non-Unix platforms, or builds with APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET=1 (apr.h)
Users are recommended to upgrade to APR version 1.7.5, which fixes this issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Portable Runtime (APR) |
Version: 0.9.0 ≤ 1.7.4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-49582",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-26T17:39:05.591843Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-13T14:25:56.517Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-01T17:03:02.892Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/26/1"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241101-0004/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Portable Runtime (APR)",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.7.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Thomas Stangner"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Lax permissions set by the Apache Portable Runtime library on Unix platforms would allow local users read access to named shared memory segments, potentially revealing sensitive application data. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue does not affect non-Unix platforms, or builds with\u0026nbsp;APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET=1 (apr.h)\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to APR version 1.7.5, which fixes this issue."
}
],
"value": "Lax permissions set by the Apache Portable Runtime library on Unix platforms would allow local users read access to named shared memory segments, potentially revealing sensitive application data. \n\nThis issue does not affect non-Unix platforms, or builds with\u00a0APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET=1 (apr.h)\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to APR version 1.7.5, which fixes this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-732",
"description": "CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T14:03:44.588Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/sntjc04t1rvjhdzz2tzmtz2zdnmv7dc4"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2023-02-08T22:06:00.000Z",
"value": "Discussion on public mailing list https://lists.apache.org/thread/h5f1c2dqm8bf5yfosw3rg85927p612l0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2023-11-15T16:21:00.000Z",
"value": "Reported to security team"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2024-08-20T17:40:00.000Z",
"value": "fixed by r1920083 in 1.7.x. r1920062 is encouraged for functional reasons."
}
],
"title": "Apache Portable Runtime (APR): Unexpected lax shared memory permissions",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-49582",
"datePublished": "2024-08-26T14:03:44.588Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-27T18:07:52.860Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-13T14:25:56.517Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-12174 (GCVE-0-2024-12174)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-12-09 21:38
Modified
2024-12-10 17:14
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Summary
An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center where an authenticated, privileged attacker could intercept email messages sent from Security Center via a rogue SMTP server.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable | Security Center |
Version: 0 ≤ |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-12174",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-10T16:08:21.550027Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-10T17:14:03.468Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "Security Center",
"vendor": "Tenable",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center where an authenticated, privileged attacker could intercept email messages sent from Security Center via a rogue SMTP server."
}
],
"value": "An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center where an authenticated, privileged attacker could intercept email messages sent from Security Center via a rogue SMTP server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-09T21:38:47.542Z",
"orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"shortName": "tenable"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2024-19"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Tenable has released Security Center 6.5.0 to address these issues. The installation files can be obtained from the Tenable Downloads Portal: \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://tenable%20has%20released%20security%20center%206.5.0%20to%20address%20these%20issues.%20the%20installation%20files%20can%20be%20obtained%20from%20the%20tenable%20downloads%20portal:%20https//www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center\"\u003ehttps://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center\u003c/a\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Tenable has released Security Center 6.5.0 to address these issues. The installation files can be obtained from the Tenable Downloads Portal: https://www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center https://tenable%20has%20released%20security%20center%206.5.0%20to%20address%20these%20issues.%20the%20installation%20files%20can%20be%20obtained%20from%20the%20tenable%20downloads%20portal:%20https//www.tenable.com/downloads/security-center"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TNS-2024-19",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
"assignerShortName": "tenable",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-12174",
"datePublished": "2024-12-09T21:38:47.542Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-04T15:35:28.231Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-10T17:14:03.468Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-5585 (GCVE-0-2024-5585)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-06-09 18:36
Modified
2025-02-13 17:54
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, the fix for CVE-2024-1874 does not work if the command name includes trailing spaces. Original issue: when using proc_open() command with array syntax, due to insufficient escaping, if the arguments of the executed command are controlled by a malicious user, the user can supply arguments that would execute arbitrary commands in Windows shell.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php:php:8.1.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php:php:8.2.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:php:php:8.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "php",
"vendor": "php",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5585",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-16T17:52:45.720953Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-16T18:15:25.949Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-19T07:35:25.799Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-9fcc-425m-g385"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0002/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/command-injection-vulnerability-in-php-on-windows-systems-cve-2024-1874-and-cve-2024-5585"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"modules": [
"proc_open"
],
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "PHP",
"repo": "https://github.com/php/php-src",
"vendor": "PHP Group",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.1.29",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.1.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.2.*",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.3.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.3.*",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "This problem only present in Windows versions of PHP. \u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "This problem only present in Windows versions of PHP."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "tianstcht"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-09T18:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In PHP versions\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;8.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, the fix for\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eCVE-2024-1874 does not work if the command name includes trailing spaces. Original issue:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003ewhen using proc_open() command with array syntax, due to insufficient escaping, if the arguments of the executed command are controlled by a malicious user, the user can supply arguments that would execute arbitrary commands in Windows shell.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In PHP versions\u00a08.1.* before 8.1.29, 8.2.* before 8.2.20, 8.3.* before 8.3.8, the fix for\u00a0CVE-2024-1874 does not work if the command name includes trailing spaces. Original issue:\u00a0when using proc_open() command with array syntax, due to insufficient escaping, if the arguments of the executed command are controlled by a malicious user, the user can supply arguments that would execute arbitrary commands in Windows shell."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-116",
"description": "CWE-116 Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-28T14:06:03.143Z",
"orgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"shortName": "php"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-9fcc-425m-g385"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/07/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKGTQUOA2NTZ3RXN22CSAUJPIRUYRB4B/"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W45DBOH56NQDRTOM2DN2LNA2FZIMC3PK/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240726-0002/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9fcc-425m-g385",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Command injection via array-ish $command parameter of proc_open() (bypass CVE-2024-1874 fix)",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Using proc_open() string syntax avoids the problem. \u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Using proc_open() string syntax avoids the problem."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
"assignerShortName": "php",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5585",
"datePublished": "2024-06-09T18:36:50.477Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-01T00:08:21.997Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:54:21.435Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-5535 (GCVE-0-2024-5535)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-06-27 10:30
Modified
2025-09-01 08:29
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-125 - Out-of-bounds Read
Summary
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an
empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to
be sent to the peer.
Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences
such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue
could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent
to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications
that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of
supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never
be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by
accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling
application.
The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS
applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN
(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and
is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more
widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of
protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns
the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the
client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the
first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap
between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is
called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and
returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports
that there was no overlap in the lists).
This function is typically called from a server side application callback for
ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list
of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in
length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never
normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the
SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list
supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the
application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has
accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has
accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len
parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap"
response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it
will be vulnerable to this problem.
In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select
a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol
in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes
from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.
However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a
client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the
application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of
confidentiality will occur.
This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most
likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not
widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.
Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active
exploitation unlikely.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of
OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they
become available.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1za",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zk",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-5535",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-08T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-14T04:55:17.007Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-15T12:04:53.153Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1za git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zk git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/15/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1za",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zk",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Joseph Birr-Pixton"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matt Caswell"
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-06-26T23:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an\u003cbr\u003eempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to\u003cbr\u003ebe sent to the peer.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences\u003cbr\u003esuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue\u003cbr\u003ecould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent\u003cbr\u003eto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications\u003cbr\u003ethat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of\u003cbr\u003esupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never\u003cbr\u003ebe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by\u003cbr\u003eaccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling\u003cbr\u003eapplication.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS\u003cbr\u003eapplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN\u003cbr\u003e(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and\u003cbr\u003eis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more\u003cbr\u003ewidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of\u003cbr\u003eprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns\u003cbr\u003ethe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the\u003cbr\u003eclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the\u003cbr\u003efirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap\u003cbr\u003ebetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is\u003cbr\u003ecalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and\u003cbr\u003ereturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports\u003cbr\u003ethat there was no overlap in the lists).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis function is typically called from a server side application callback for\u003cbr\u003eALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list\u003cbr\u003eof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in\u003cbr\u003elength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never\u003cbr\u003enormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the\u003cbr\u003eSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list\u003cbr\u003esupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the\u003cbr\u003eapplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has\u003cbr\u003eaccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has\u003cbr\u003eaccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len\u003cbr\u003eparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a \"no overlap\"\u003cbr\u003eresponse (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it\u003cbr\u003ewill be vulnerable to this problem.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select\u003cbr\u003ea protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol\u003cbr\u003ein the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes\u003cbr\u003efrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.\u003cbr\u003eHowever if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a\u003cbr\u003eclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the\u003cbr\u003eapplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of\u003cbr\u003econfidentiality will occur.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most\u003cbr\u003elikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not\u003cbr\u003ewidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.\u003cbr\u003eFinally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active\u003cbr\u003eexploitation unlikely.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\nDue to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they\u003cbr\u003ebecome available."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an\nempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to\nbe sent to the peer.\n\nImpact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences\nsuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue\ncould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent\nto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications\nthat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of\nsupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never\nbe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by\naccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling\napplication.\n\nThe OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS\napplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN\n(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and\nis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more\nwidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of\nprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns\nthe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the\nclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the\nfirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap\nbetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is\ncalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and\nreturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports\nthat there was no overlap in the lists).\n\nThis function is typically called from a server side application callback for\nALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list\nof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in\nlength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never\nnormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the\nSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list\nsupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the\napplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has\naccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has\naccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len\nparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a \"no overlap\"\nresponse (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it\nwill be vulnerable to this problem.\n\nIn the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select\na protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol\nin the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes\nfrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.\nHowever if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a\nclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the\napplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of\nconfidentiality will occur.\n\nThis issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most\nlikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not\nwidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.\nFinally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active\nexploitation unlikely.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.\n\nDue to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of\nOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they\nbecome available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T08:29:27.594Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.3.2 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c"
},
{
"name": "3.2.3 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e"
},
{
"name": "3.1.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37"
},
{
"name": "3.0.15 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1za git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zk git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-5535",
"datePublished": "2024-06-27T10:30:53.118Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-30T15:34:36.813Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T08:29:27.594Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…