CWE-606
Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
The product does not properly check inputs that are used for loop conditions, potentially leading to a denial of service or other consequences because of excessive looping.
CVE-2023-5678 (GCVE-0-2023-5678)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-11-06 15:47
Modified
2025-11-03 21:50
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking
excessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.
Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to
generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications
that use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.
Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from
an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),
DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore
vulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.
Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large
P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q.
An application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and
supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be
vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of
other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other
functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this
are DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().
Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the
"-pubcheck" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:50:41.915Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231130-0010/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/11/1"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00033.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.2zj",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1x",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.1.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "David Benjamin (Google)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Richard Levitte"
}
],
"datePublic": "2023-11-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\u003cbr\u003eexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\u003cbr\u003egenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\u003cbr\u003ethat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\u003cbr\u003eto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\u003cbr\u003eWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\u003cbr\u003ean untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\u003cbr\u003eDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\u003cbr\u003evulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\u003cbr\u003eP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\u003cbr\u003esupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\u003cbr\u003evulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\u003cbr\u003eother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\u003cbr\u003efunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\u003cbr\u003eare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\u003cbr\u003e\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking\nexcessively long X9.42 DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to\ngenerate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications\nthat use DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()\nto check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.\nWhere the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from\nan untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nWhile DH_check() performs all the necessary checks (as of CVE-2023-3817),\nDH_check_pub_key() doesn\u0027t make any of these checks, and is therefore\nvulnerable for excessively large P and Q parameters.\n\nLikewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an excessively large\nP, it doesn\u0027t check for an excessively large Q.\n\nAn application that calls DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and\nsupplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be\nvulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nDH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also called by a number of\nother OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other\nfunctions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this\nare DH_check_pub_key_ex(), EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line application when using the\n\"-pubcheck\" option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\n\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "LOW"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:53.778Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20231106.txt"
},
{
"name": "1.0.2zj git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=34efaef6c103d636ab507a0cc34dca4d3aecc055"
},
{
"name": "1.1.1x git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=710fee740904b6290fef0dd5536fbcedbc38ff0c"
},
{
"name": "3.0.13 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db925ae2e65d0d925adef429afc37f75bd1c2017"
},
{
"name": "3.1.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddeb4b6c6d527e54ce9a99cba785c0f7776e54b6"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter value",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-5678",
"datePublished": "2023-11-06T15:47:30.795Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-10-20T09:38:43.518Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:50:41.915Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-43499 (GCVE-0-2024-43499)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-11-12 17:53
Modified
2025-08-27 21:33
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.6 |
Version: 17.6.0 < 17.6.21 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43499",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-13T16:28:19.318382Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T21:33:04.437Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.6",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.6.21",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.10",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.10.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.10",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.8",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.8.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.8.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.11",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.11.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.11",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": "PowerShell 7.5",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.5.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"Unknown"
],
"product": ".NET 9.0",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.6.21",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.6.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.10.9",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.8.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.8.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:visual_studio:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "17.11.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "17.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:powershell:*:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.5.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "7.5.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.0.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "9.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-11-12T08:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-409",
"description": "CWE-409: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T15:40:59.877Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2024-43499"
}
],
"title": ".NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-43499",
"datePublished": "2024-11-12T17:53:35.848Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-14T01:08:33.522Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-27T21:33:04.437Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-42930 (GCVE-0-2025-42930)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-09-09 02:11
Modified
2025-09-09 13:32
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
SAP Business Planning and Consolidation allows an authenticated standard user to call a function module by crafting specific parameters that causes a loop, consuming excessive resources and resulting in system unavailability. This leads to high impact on the availability of the application, there is no impact on confidentiality or integrity.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP_SE | SAP Business Planning and Consolidation |
Version: BPC4HANA 200 Version: 300 Version: SAP_BW 750 Version: 751 Version: 752 Version: 753 Version: 754 Version: 755 Version: 756 Version: 757 Version: 758 Version: 816 Version: 914 Version: CPMBPC 810 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-42930",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-09T13:32:36.244245Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-09T13:32:49.181Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SAP Business Planning and Consolidation",
"vendor": "SAP_SE",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "BPC4HANA 200"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "300"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BW 750"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "751"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "752"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "753"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "754"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "755"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "756"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "757"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "758"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "816"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "914"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "CPMBPC 810"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eSAP Business Planning and Consolidation allows an authenticated standard user to call a function module by crafting specific parameters that causes a loop, consuming excessive resources and resulting in system unavailability. This leads to high impact on the availability of the application, there is no impact on confidentiality or integrity.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "SAP Business Planning and Consolidation allows an authenticated standard user to call a function module by crafting specific parameters that causes a loop, consuming excessive resources and resulting in system unavailability. This leads to high impact on the availability of the application, there is no impact on confidentiality or integrity."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "eng",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-09T02:11:18.387Z",
"orgId": "e4686d1a-f260-4930-ac4c-2f5c992778dd",
"shortName": "sap"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3614067"
},
{
"url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in SAP Business Planning and Consolidation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e4686d1a-f260-4930-ac4c-2f5c992778dd",
"assignerShortName": "sap",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-42930",
"datePublished": "2025-09-09T02:11:18.387Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T13:25:32.385Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-09T13:32:49.181Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-43801 (GCVE-0-2025-43801)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-09-16 16:09
Modified
2025-09-16 18:26
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-606 - Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Summary
Unchecked input for loop condition vulnerability in XML-RPC in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to perform a denial-of-service (DoS) attacks via a crafted XML-RPC request.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-43801",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-16T17:29:59.831142Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-16T18:26:50.777Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Portal",
"vendor": "Liferay",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.3.111",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "DXP",
"vendor": "Liferay",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.3.10-u35",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.3.10",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.13-u92",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.13",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2023.Q3.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2023.Q3.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2023.Q4.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Unchecked input for loop condition vulnerability in XML-RPC in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to perform a denial-of-service (DoS) attacks via a crafted XML-RPC request."
}
],
"value": "Unchecked input for loop condition vulnerability in XML-RPC in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to perform a denial-of-service (DoS) attacks via a crafted XML-RPC request."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-16T16:09:05.191Z",
"orgId": "8b54e794-c6f0-462e-9faa-c1001a673ac3",
"shortName": "Liferay"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://liferay.dev/portal/security/known-vulnerabilities/-/asset_publisher/jekt/content/CVE-2025-43801"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8b54e794-c6f0-462e-9faa-c1001a673ac3",
"assignerShortName": "Liferay",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-43801",
"datePublished": "2025-09-16T16:09:05.191Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-17T10:55:33.791Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-16T18:26:50.777Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Do not use user-controlled data for loop conditions.
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Perform input validation.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.