CVE-2026-86408 (GCVE-0-2026-86408)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-07 12:11 – Updated: 2026-09-07 12:11
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
MISP Missing Authorization in Cryptographic Key View Exposes Signing Keys from Protected Events
Summary
Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view().
The vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as:
*
type
*
key_data
*
fingerprint
but did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first.
The upstream commit explicitly states that cryptographicKeys/view could return a protected event’s signing key to any authenticated user.
The fix adds parent_id and parent_type to the lookup and then enforces authorization through the associated event using fetchSimpleEvent($user, parent_id). If the parent is not an Event, access is limited to site administrators.
Version affected: ≤2.5.45
Severity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/2edde619b | patch |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MISP",
"programFiles": [
"app/Controller/CryptographicKeysController.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
"vendor": "MISP",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.45",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Scottish Government - National Cyber Team"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "iglocska"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Claude Opus 5 (1M context)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAffected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through \u003ccode\u003eCryptographicKeysController::view()\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerable handler queried \u003ccode\u003eCryptographicKey\u003c/code\u003e directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003ccode\u003etype\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003ccode\u003ekey_data\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003ccode\u003efingerprint\u003c/code\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ebut did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe upstream commit explicitly states that \u003ccode\u003ecryptographicKeys/view\u003c/code\u003e could return a \u003cstrong\u003eprotected event\u2019s signing key to any authenticated user\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fix adds \u003ccode\u003eparent_id\u003c/code\u003e and \u003ccode\u003eparent_type\u003c/code\u003e to the lookup and then enforces authorization through the associated event using \u003ccode\u003efetchSimpleEvent($user, parent_id)\u003c/code\u003e. If the parent is not an Event, access is limited to site administrators.\u003c/p\u003eVersion affected: \u22642.5.45\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view().\n\n\nThe vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as:\n\n\n\n * \ntype\n\n\n * \nkey_data\n\n\n * \nfingerprint\n\n\n\n\n\nbut did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first.\n\n\nThe upstream commit explicitly states that cryptographicKeys/view could return a protected event\u2019s signing key to any authenticated user.\n\n\nThe fix adds parent_id and parent_type to the lookup and then enforces authorization through the associated event using fetchSimpleEvent($user, parent_id). If the parent is not an Event, access is limited to site administrators.\n\nVersion affected: \u22642.5.45"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862 Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:11:18.233Z",
"orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"shortName": "CIRCL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/2edde619b"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "MISP Missing Authorization in Cryptographic Key View Exposes Signing Keys from Protected Events",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-86408",
"datePublished": "2026-09-07T12:11:18.233Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-07T12:11:12.888Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T12:11:18.233Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-86408\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"published\":\"2026-09-07T13:20:40.100\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-07T13:20:40.100\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Affected versions of MISP do not enforce parent-event visibility when serving cryptographic keys through CryptographicKeysController::view().\\n\\n\\nThe vulnerable handler queried CryptographicKey directly using the supplied key ID and selected sensitive fields such as:\\n\\n\\n\\n * \\ntype\\n\\n\\n * \\nkey_data\\n\\n\\n * \\nfingerprint\\n\\n\\n\\n\\n\\nbut did not fetch or authorize the associated parent event first.\\n\\n\\nThe upstream commit explicitly states that cryptographicKeys/view could return a protected event\u2019s signing key to any authenticated user.\\n\\n\\nThe fix adds parent_id and parent_type to the lookup and then enforces authorization through the associated event using fetchSimpleEvent($user, parent_id). If the parent is not an Event, access is limited to site administrators.\\n\\nVersion affected: \u22642.5.45\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"MISP\",\"product\":\"MISP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"programFiles\":[\"app/Controller/CryptographicKeysController.php\"],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/MISP/MISP\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"2.5.45\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-639\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-862\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/2edde619b\",\"source\":\"5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…