Vulnerability-Lookup

CVE-2026-45297 (GCVE-0-2026-45297)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-28 16:50 – Updated: 2026-05-29 15:31

Title

Cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch

Summary

OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == "projectId" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({"errors":["tenants already registered"]} on second signup) so there's no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.

Severity

5.3 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2026-05-29 15:31 UTC

CWE

CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization

Assigner

GitHub_M mitre root

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security…	x_refsource_CONFIRM

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version	CPE status
openreplay	openreplay	Affected: < 1.26.0	guessed

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-45297",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-29T15:31:04.896764Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T15:31:12.971Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "openreplay",
          "vendor": "openreplay",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.26.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == \"projectId\" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({\"errors\":[\"tenants already registered\"]} on second signup) so there\u0027s no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T16:50:38.672Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-45297",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-28T16:50:38.672Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-11T20:14:43.201Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T15:31:12.971Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-45297",
      "date": "2026-09-17",
      "epss": "0.00207",
      "percentile": "0.11071"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-45297\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-05-28T18:16:34.643\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T10:51:53.093\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == \\\"projectId\\\" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({\\\"errors\\\":[\\\"tenants already registered\\\"]} on second signup) so there\u0027s no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"openreplay\",\"product\":\"openreplay\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.26.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-05-29T15:31:04.896764Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-45297\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"yes\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-285\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-639\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-05-29T20:13:12+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-45297",
      "id": "CVE-2026-45297",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-45297.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-45297\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-29T15:31:04.896764Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T15:31:09.548Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"openreplay\", \"product\": \"openreplay\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.26.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == \\\"projectId\\\" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({\\\"errors\\\":[\\\"tenants already registered\\\"]} on second signup) so there\u0027s no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-285\", \"description\": \"CWE-285: Improper Authorization\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-639\", \"description\": \"CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"description\": \"CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-28T16:50:38.672Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-45297\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-29T15:31:12.971Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-11T20:14:43.201Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-28T16:50:38.672Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}

FKIE_CVE-2026-45297

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-28 18:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:51

Severity

5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Summary

References

	URL	Tags
	security-advisories@github.com	https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "openreplay",
          "vendor": "openreplay",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.26.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "OpenReplay is a self-hosted session replay suite. Prior to 1.26.0, there is a cross-tenant IDOR on feature-flag and assist-stats routes via {project_id} case mismatch. ProjectAuthorizer.__call__ (OSS api/auth/auth_project.py:14-38 and EE ee/api/auth/auth_project.py:14-46) only runs projects.is_authorized(project_id, tenant_id, user_id) + projects.get_project(tenant_id, project_id) when self.project_identifier == \"projectId\" (camelCase). For EE multi-tenant, feature-flag queries only filter on project_id, never tenant_id. Any authenticated user in tenant A can read/update/delete feature-flag rows belonging to tenant B by iterating the sequential integer project_id + feature_flag_id. OSS is single-tenant by design ({\"errors\":[\"tenants already registered\"]} on second signup) so there\u0027s no cross-tenant impact This vulnerability is fixed in 1.26.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-45297",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:51:53.093",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "NONE",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-45297",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-05-29T15:31:04.896764Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-28T18:16:34.643",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/openreplay/openreplay/security/advisories/GHSA-5m23-rcj4-cgjx"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-285"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-639"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-863"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.