GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

JVNDB-2025-000012

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2025-02-17 04:43 - Updated:2025-02-17 04:43
Severity
Summary
Multiple vulnerabilities in The LuxCal Web Calendar
Details
The LuxCal Web Calendar provided by LuxSoft contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.
  • SQL injection in pdf.php (CWE-89) - CVE-2025-25221
  • SQL injection in retrieve.php (CWE-89) - CVE-2025-25222
  • Path traversal in dloader.php (CWE-22) - CVE-2025-25223
  • Missing authentication in dloader.php (CWE-306) - CVE-2025-25224
CVE-2025-25221, CVE-2025-25222 Rikuto Tauchi reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership. CVE-2025-25223, CVE-2025-25224 Yuji Tounai of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000012.html",
  "dc:date": "2025-02-17T13:43+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2025-02-17T13:43+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2025-02-17T13:43+09:00",
  "description": "The LuxCal Web Calendar provided by LuxSoft contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.\r\n\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eSQL injection in pdf.php (CWE-89) - CVE-2025-25221\u003c/li\u003e\r\n\u003cli\u003eSQL injection in retrieve.php (CWE-89) - CVE-2025-25222\u003c/li\u003e\r\n\u003cli\u003ePath traversal in dloader.php (CWE-22) - CVE-2025-25223\u003c/li\u003e\r\n\u003cli\u003eMissing authentication in dloader.php (CWE-306) - CVE-2025-25224\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\r\n\r\nCVE-2025-25221, CVE-2025-25222\r\nRikuto Tauchi reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.\r\n\r\nCVE-2025-25223, CVE-2025-25224\r\nYuji Tounai of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000012.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:luxsoft:luxcal_web_calendar",
    "@product": "The LuxCal Web Calendar",
    "@vendor": "LuxSoft",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "7.3",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
    "@version": "3.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2025-000012",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN26024080/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#26024080",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25221",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-25221",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25222",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-25222",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25223",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-25223",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25224",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-25224",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-22",
      "@title": "Path Traversal(CWE-22)"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-89",
      "@title": "SQL Injection(CWE-89)"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-Other",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in The LuxCal Web Calendar"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…