GHSA-VWP5-F99X-X3RQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 16:24 – Updated: 2026-10-07 16:24
VLAI
Summary
Backstage has improper input validation in scaffolder task list ordering
Details
Impact
An authenticated Backstage user with permission to create and read relevant scaffolder tasks may be able to infer confidential task data under specific conditions. Successful exploitation requires retained task secrets, visibility of a target task, knowledge of the secret structure, and repeated requests.
Patches
Patched in @backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend version 4.1.0
Workarounds
- At the gateway or reverse proxy, reject task-list requests that specify custom ordering, or allow ordering only by
created_at,status, andcreated_by. - Restrict scaffolder task creation and task read permissions to trusted users, preferably using owner-based task-read conditions.
- Disabling task recovery can reduce secret retention after a task is claimed, but it does not protect secrets in queued tasks and should not be treated as complete mitigation.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-106506"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-202",
"CWE-203"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T16:24:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T22:17:05Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nAn authenticated Backstage user with permission to create and read relevant scaffolder tasks may be able to infer confidential task data under specific conditions. Successful exploitation requires retained task secrets, visibility of a target task, knowledge of the secret structure, and repeated requests.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` version `4.1.0`\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- At the gateway or reverse proxy, reject task-list requests that specify custom ordering, or allow ordering only by `created_at`, `status`, and `created_by`.\n- Restrict scaffolder task creation and task read permissions to trusted users, preferably using owner-based task-read conditions.\n- Disabling task recovery can reduce secret retention after a task is claimed, but it does not protect secrets in queued tasks and should not be treated as complete mitigation.",
"id": "GHSA-vwp5-f99x-x3rq",
"modified": "2026-10-07T16:24:12Z",
"published": "2026-10-07T16:24:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/security/advisories/GHSA-vwp5-f99x-x3rq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-106506"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/commit/e673a869449874a9169e8f89852e75e862011b93"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/backstage/backstage/releases/tag/v1.54.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Backstage has improper input validation in scaffolder task list ordering"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…