GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-PF56-329R-95RW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-21 19:34 – Updated: 2026-07-21 19:34
VLAI
Summary
Credential confusion in @sigstore/oci can leak registry credentials to an attacker-controlled registry
Details

Impact

This is a credential-exposure / credential-confusion issue.

getRegistryCredentials() reads credentials from the Docker config file (~/.docker/config.json) and selects an entry by checking whether any configured auth key contains the target registry string:

Object.keys(dockerConfig.auths || {}).find((key) => key.includes(registry))

Because this is a substring match rather than an exact host match, credentials configured for one registry can be selected for — and transmitted to — a different registry whose hostname has a substring relationship with a configured auth key (for example, an attacker-controlled cr.io matches a configured ghcr.io).

Who is impacted: Any consumer of @sigstore/oci that uploads artifacts to an OCI registry using credentials from a Docker config, where the destination registry/image reference can be influenced by an untrusted party. This includes @actions/attest and the actions/attest, actions/attest-build-provenance, and actions/attest-sbom GitHub Actions when run with push-to-registry: true, where the subject-name input determines the destination registry.

This is classified as a critical vulnerability given the potential, in a theoretical worst-case scenario, to expose long-lived registry credentials. However, in practice, exploitation requires all of the following:

  • The Docker config on the host contains credentials for a registry.
  • The destination registry/image reference is influenced by an untrusted source.
  • The attacker controls a registry whose hostname is a substring of (or is otherwise contained within) a configured Docker auth key.

Under those conditions, registry credentials present on the host (e.g. a GHCR, Docker Hub, or cloud-registry token) can be sent to an attacker-controlled registry during the authentication exchange.

Patches

Fixed in @sigstore/oci@0.7.1. Credential selection now requires an exact host match: both the target registry and each Docker auth key are canonicalized — stripping any https?:// scheme and path and normalizing the Docker Hub aliases (index.docker.io / registry-1.docker.io / docker.io) — and compared for equality. When no exact match exists, credential lookup now fails rather than falling back to an unrelated credential.

  • Affected versions: <= 0.7.0 (all releases from 0.1.0).
  • Patched version: 0.7.1.

Downstream consumers should pick up the patched @sigstore/oci; subsequent releases of @actions/attest and the actions/attest* GitHub Actions will bundle the fix.

Workarounds

  • Treat the destination registry/image reference as trusted input — do not allow untrusted sources to influence the registry/image reference passed to @sigstore/oci (or the subject-name of actions/attest* when push-to-registry: true).
  • Limit the credentials available in the host's Docker config to only those required for the operation, and avoid authenticating to registries whose hostnames have substring relationships with potential untrusted destinations.
  • Scope registry tokens narrowly and prefer short-lived credentials.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@sigstore/oci"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.7.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59891"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-522"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-21T19:34:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-14T17:17:15Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nThis is a credential-exposure / credential-confusion issue.\n\n`getRegistryCredentials()` reads credentials from the Docker config file (`~/.docker/config.json`) and selects an entry by checking whether any configured auth key **contains** the target registry string:\n\n```js\nObject.keys(dockerConfig.auths || {}).find((key) =\u003e key.includes(registry))\n```\n\nBecause this is a **substring match rather than an exact host match**, credentials configured for one registry can be selected for \u2014 and transmitted to \u2014 a *different* registry whose hostname has a substring relationship with a configured auth key (for example, an attacker-controlled `cr.io` matches a configured `ghcr.io`).\n\n**Who is impacted:** Any consumer of `@sigstore/oci` that uploads artifacts to an OCI registry using credentials from a Docker config, where the destination registry/image reference can be influenced by an untrusted party. This includes `@actions/attest` and the `actions/attest`, `actions/attest-build-provenance`, and `actions/attest-sbom` GitHub Actions when run with `push-to-registry: true`, where the `subject-name` input determines the destination registry.\n\nThis is classified as a **critical** vulnerability given the potential, in a theoretical worst-case scenario, to expose long-lived registry credentials. However, in practice, exploitation requires all of the following:\n\n- The Docker config on the host contains credentials for a registry.\n- The destination registry/image reference is influenced by an untrusted source.\n- The attacker controls a registry whose hostname is a substring of (or is otherwise contained within) a configured Docker auth key.\n\nUnder those conditions, registry credentials present on the host (e.g. a GHCR, Docker Hub, or cloud-registry token) can be sent to an attacker-controlled registry during the authentication exchange.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in **`@sigstore/oci@0.7.1`**. Credential selection now requires an **exact host match**: both the target registry and each Docker auth key are canonicalized \u2014 stripping any `https?://` scheme and path and normalizing the Docker Hub aliases (`index.docker.io` / `registry-1.docker.io` / `docker.io`) \u2014 and compared for equality. When no exact match exists, credential lookup now fails rather than falling back to an unrelated credential.\n\n- **Affected versions:** `\u003c= 0.7.0` (all releases from `0.1.0`).\n- **Patched version:** `0.7.1`.\n\nDownstream consumers should pick up the patched `@sigstore/oci`; subsequent releases of `@actions/attest` and the `actions/attest*` GitHub Actions will bundle the fix.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Treat the destination registry/image reference as trusted input \u2014 do not allow untrusted sources to influence the registry/image reference passed to `@sigstore/oci` (or the `subject-name` of `actions/attest*` when `push-to-registry: true`).\n- Limit the credentials available in the host\u0027s Docker config to only those required for the operation, and avoid authenticating to registries whose hostnames have substring relationships with potential untrusted destinations.\n- Scope registry tokens narrowly and prefer short-lived credentials.",
  "id": "GHSA-pf56-329r-95rw",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T19:34:05Z",
  "published": "2026-07-21T19:34:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js/security/advisories/GHSA-pf56-329r-95rw"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js/commit/85c58380758b97ce1b74ef470e55cc21f9d3aa89"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/sigstore-js/releases/tag/%40sigstore%2Foci%400.7.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Credential confusion in @sigstore/oci can leak registry credentials to an attacker-controlled registry"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…