GHSA-FGCH-86X8-FV43
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 09:30 – Updated: 2026-09-04 18:47
VLAI
Summary
Apache Airflow FTP provider: FTP Provider does not protect FTPS data channel (missing PROT_P)
Details
The Apache Airflow FTP provider's FTPSHook.get_conn() created an ftplib.FTP_TLS connection but never called prot_p(), so although the control channel was TLS-protected the data channel was transmitted in cleartext. Any deployment using FTPSHook or FTPSFileTransmitOperator to move files over FTPS exposed file contents and credentials-in-transit to a network attacker able to observe the data connection. Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-ftp to 3.15.1 or later, which issues PROT P to encrypt the data channel.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow-providers-ftp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49486"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-319"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-04T18:47:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-26T08:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Apache Airflow FTP provider\u0027s `FTPSHook.get_conn()` created an `ftplib.FTP_TLS` connection but never called `prot_p()`, so although the control channel was TLS-protected the data channel was transmitted in cleartext. Any deployment using `FTPSHook` or `FTPSFileTransmitOperator` to move files over FTPS exposed file contents and credentials-in-transit to a network attacker able to observe the data connection. Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-ftp to `3.15.1` or later, which issues `PROT P` to encrypt the data channel.",
"id": "GHSA-fgch-86x8-fv43",
"modified": "2026-09-04T18:47:12Z",
"published": "2026-06-26T09:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49486"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/67946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/a929d142d667f71dea29c565a7167216a9c30378"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/releases/tag/providers-ftp/3.15.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/PYSEC-2026-238.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gwnsxlt9hfj5pc543wxtogbnjdn04xj1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/26/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Airflow FTP provider: FTP Provider does not protect FTPS data channel (missing PROT_P)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…