GHSA-6X8V-2FQ5-2229

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-18 13:07 – Updated: 2026-06-18 13:07
VLAI
Summary
ZITADEL: Cross-Tenant User Leakage via Recycled Identifiers
Details

Summary

A flaw in the user lifecycle enforcement allowed deleted users to retain their original organization/tenant association. Recreating a deleted user under a distinct organization can cause the new user instance to be incorrectly provisioned within the original organization if the previous ID would be used to recreate it.

Impact

When a user is created, the system maps the generated or provided ID to its target organization (Org A). When that user is subsequently deleted, a deletion event is appended to the stream, but the historical mapping of the resource owner within the event store's validation layer is not cleared.

If a new user is later provisioned in a different organization (Org B) using that exact same ID, the event store validation logic reads the stream's history, matches it to the original organization, and routes the new user's events to Org A instead of Org B.

This issue represents a localized multi-tenancy isolation anomaly rather than an easily exploitable attack vector. Because the new user instance is incorrectly routed and provisioned inside Org A instead of Org B, an administrator from Org A inadvertently gains full access to this new user record.

However, there is no technical mechanism for a malicious actor to force, automate, or target this behavior against a specific user or tenant. Because the scenario relies entirely on an accidental sequence of operational events and requires the recycling of a highly specific ID space, the practical security risk is exceptionally low.

Affected Versions

Systems running one of the following versions are affected:

  • 4.x: 4.0.0 through 4.15.1 (including RC versions)
  • 3.x: 3.0.0 through 3.4.11 (including RC versions)

Patches

The vulnerability has been addressed in the latest releases. The patch resolves the issue by requiring the correct permission in case the verification flag is provided and only allows self-management of the email address, resp. phone number itself.

Workarounds

The recommended solution is to upgrade to a patched version.

Questions

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please email us at security@zitadel.com

Credits

Thanks to Charlie Graven from Famedly for reporting this vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/zitadel/zitadel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.80.0-v2.20.0.20260615092437-6082e59d47c1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55670"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-284",
      "CWE-639"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T13:07:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA flaw in the user lifecycle enforcement allowed deleted users to retain their original organization/tenant association. Recreating a deleted user under a distinct organization can cause the new user instance to be incorrectly provisioned within the original organization if the previous ID would be used to recreate it.\n\n### Impact\n\nWhen a user is created, the system maps the generated or provided ID to its target organization (`Org A`). When that user is subsequently deleted, a deletion event is appended to the stream, but the historical mapping of the resource owner within the event store\u0027s validation layer is not cleared.\n\nIf a new user is later provisioned in a different organization (`Org B`) using that exact same ID, the event store validation logic reads the stream\u0027s history, matches it to the original organization, and routes the new user\u0027s events to `Org A` instead of `Org B`.\n\nThis issue represents a localized multi-tenancy isolation anomaly rather than an easily exploitable attack vector. Because the new user instance is incorrectly routed and provisioned inside `Org A` instead of `Org B`, an administrator from `Org A` inadvertently gains full access to this new user record.\n\nHowever, there is no technical mechanism for a malicious actor to force, automate, or target this behavior against a specific user or tenant. Because the scenario relies entirely on an accidental sequence of operational events and requires the recycling of a highly specific ID space, the practical security risk is exceptionally low.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nSystems running one of the following versions are affected:\n\n* **4.x:** `4.0.0` through `4.15.1` (including RC versions)\n* **3.x:** `3.0.0` through `3.4.11` (including RC versions)\n\n### Patches\n\nThe vulnerability has been addressed in the latest releases. The patch resolves the issue by requiring the correct permission in case the verification flag is provided and only allows self-management of the email address, resp. phone number itself.\n\n- **4.x**: Upgrade to $\\ge$[4.15.2](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v4.15.2)\n- **3.x**: Update to $\\ge$[4.15.2](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v4.15.2)\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThe recommended solution is to upgrade to a patched version. \n\n### Questions\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please email us at [security@zitadel.com](mailto:security@zitadel.com)\n\n### Credits\n\nThanks to Charlie Graven from Famedly for reporting this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-6x8v-2fq5-2229",
  "modified": "2026-06-18T13:07:35Z",
  "published": "2026-06-18T13:07:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-6x8v-2fq5-2229"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/commit/6082e59d47c17a9d54a6b0556b3f31559d7c620a"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v4.15.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": " ZITADEL: Cross-Tenant User Leakage via Recycled Identifiers"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…