FKIE_CVE-2026-25602
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-20 11:16 - Updated: 2026-09-25 15:17
Severity
Summary
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in the feedback function of Mesalvo MEONA (MEONA Client and MEONA Server). The MEONA Client transmits the recipient address of a feedback report to the MEONA Server, and the server sends the report to the transmitted address instead of the address configured on the server. The feedback function is available only in the MEONA administration area, which requires one of the administrative roles ADMINISTRATOR, SUPERADMINISTRATOR or TYPIST (catalogue editing), or the PHARMACIST role holding the PHARMACY_ADMINISTRATOR right, assigned explicitly by the operating hospital's administrators. Such a user who modifies the client request can cause the MEONA Server to send a message with content of the user's choosing, from the sender address configured on the server, to a recipient of the user's choosing, within the limits permitted by the operator's mail relay. The message can be used for social engineering because it appears to originate from an internal hospital system.
Exploitation requires a MEONA account with one of the administrative roles named above and access to the operating hospital's internal network; MEONA is operated exclusively within closed hospital networks without exposure to the public Internet, and where a hospital permits remote access to that network at all, it is only through the hospital's own remote-access infrastructure (e.g. VPN) under the hospital's control. The message contains only the recipient, subject and text entered by the user; no data of other users or patients is disclosed. Mesalvo is not aware of any exploitation outside the reported security test.
This issue affects MEONA Client and MEONA Server in versions 2024.10, 2025.04 (before 2025.04.24) and 2026.03 (before 2026.03.02). MEONA 2025.04.24 and 2026.03.02 (planned Q4 2026) enforce the configured recipient address on the server. Operators can restrict at their mail relay which recipients the MEONA sender address may reach.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Meona Server",
"vendor": "Mesalvo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2024.10",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2025.04.24",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025.04",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2026.03.02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2026.03",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Meona Client",
"vendor": "Mesalvo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2024.10",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2025.04.24",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2025.04",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "2026.03.02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2026.03",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in the feedback function of Mesalvo MEONA (MEONA Client and MEONA Server). The MEONA Client transmits the recipient address of a feedback report to the MEONA Server, and the server sends the report to the transmitted address instead of the address configured on the server. The feedback function is available only in the MEONA administration area, which requires one of the administrative roles ADMINISTRATOR, SUPERADMINISTRATOR or TYPIST (catalogue editing), or the PHARMACIST role holding the PHARMACY_ADMINISTRATOR right, assigned explicitly by the operating hospital\u0027s administrators. Such a user who modifies the client request can cause the MEONA Server to send a message with content of the user\u0027s choosing, from the sender address configured on the server, to a recipient of the user\u0027s choosing, within the limits permitted by the operator\u0027s\u00a0mail relay. The message can be used for social engineering because it appears to originate from an internal hospital system.\nExploitation requires a MEONA account with one of the administrative roles named above and access to the operating hospital\u0027s internal network; MEONA is operated exclusively within closed hospital networks without exposure to the public Internet, and where a hospital permits remote access to that network at all, it is only through the hospital\u0027s own remote-access infrastructure (e.g. VPN) under the hospital\u0027s control. The message contains only the recipient, subject and text entered by the user; no data of other users or patients is disclosed. Mesalvo is not aware of any exploitation outside the reported security test.\nThis issue affects MEONA Client and MEONA Server in versions 2024.10, 2025.04 (before 2025.04.24) and 2026.03 (before 2026.03.02). MEONA 2025.04.24 and 2026.03.02 (planned Q4 2026) enforce the configured recipient address on the server. Operators can restrict at their mail relay which recipients the MEONA sender address may reach."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de Verificaci\u00f3n Insuficiente de la Autenticidad de los Datos en el Componente Lanzador de Cliente Mesalvo Meona, Componente de Servidor Mesalvo Meona posibilita el env\u00edo de mensajes a cualquier direcci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico. Este problema afecta al Componente Lanzador de Cliente Meona: hasta el 19.06.2020 15:11:49; Componente de Servidor Meona: hasta el 2025.04 5+323020."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-25602",
"lastModified": "2026-09-25T15:17:54.327",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.3,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 0.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25602",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-20T11:59:55.804011Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-05-20T11:16:26.313",
"references": [
{
"source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"url": "https://mesalvo.com/en/vdp/advisories/msa-2026-005.pdf"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-345"
}
],
"source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…