fkie_cve-2024-51941
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-01-21 22:15
Modified
2025-01-22 15:15
Severity ?
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
A remote code injection vulnerability exists in the Ambari Metrics and AMS Alerts feature, allowing authenticated users to inject and execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability occurs when processing alert definitions, where malicious input can be injected into the alert script execution path. An attacker with authenticated access can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the server. The issue has been fixed in the latest versions of Ambari.
References
security@apache.orghttps://lists.apache.org/thread/xq50nlff7o7z1kq3y637clzzl6mjhl8j
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/21/9
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "A remote code injection vulnerability exists in the Ambari Metrics and \nAMS Alerts feature, allowing authenticated users to inject and execute \narbitrary code. The vulnerability occurs when processing alert \ndefinitions, where malicious input can be injected into the alert script\n execution path. An attacker with authenticated access can exploit this \nvulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the server. The issue has\n been fixed in the latest versions of Ambari.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "Existe una vulnerabilidad de inyección de código remoto en la función Ambari Metrics y AMS Alerts, que permite a los usuarios autenticados inyectar y ejecutar código arbitrario. La vulnerabilidad se produce al procesar definiciones de alertas, donde se puede inyectar información maliciosa en la ruta de ejecución de la alerta script. Un atacante con acceso autenticado puede aprovechar esta vulnerabilidad para ejecutar comandos arbitrarios en el servidor. El problema se ha solucionado en las últimas versiones de Ambari.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2024-51941",
   lastModified: "2025-01-22T15:15:14.247",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "HIGH",
               baseScore: 8.8,
               baseSeverity: "HIGH",
               confidentialityImpact: "HIGH",
               integrityImpact: "HIGH",
               privilegesRequired: "LOW",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 2.8,
            impactScore: 5.9,
            source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
            type: "Secondary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-01-21T22:15:12.447",
   references: [
      {
         source: "security@apache.org",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/xq50nlff7o7z1kq3y637clzzl6mjhl8j",
      },
      {
         source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/01/21/9",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "security@apache.org",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-75",
            },
         ],
         source: "security@apache.org",
         type: "Secondary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.