CVE-2026-50749 (GCVE-0-2026-50749)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-05 15:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 15:27
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Apache Answer: Missing authorization in revision audit reject allows authenticated users to reject pending revisions
Summary
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.
This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.
Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-06 15:27 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/ogk461yr4w9o95k15… | vendor-advisory |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/0… |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Answer |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2.0.1
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T16:32:57.029Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/05/12"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50749",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-06T15:27:02.065911Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:27:21.369Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Answer",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "tonghuaroot"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Mattia Campanelli"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Cavan Loughran"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Xi Yang"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\u003c/p\u003eAny authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\n\nAny authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T15:11:05.448Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ogk461yr4w9o95k15bkjxk2kpbkrbnln"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Answer: Missing authorization in revision audit reject allows authenticated users to reject pending revisions",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50749",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T15:11:05.448Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-06T16:56:13.231Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:27:21.369Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-50749",
"date": "2026-09-24",
"epss": "0.0047",
"percentile": "0.37951"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Answer",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:answer:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5584F84D-4A07-42B6-8380-4DBD2C81D87B",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.0.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\n\nAny authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-50749",
"lastModified": "2026-08-06T18:38:07.520",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50749",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-06T15:27:02.065911Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-05T16:16:57.790",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ogk461yr4w9o95k15bkjxk2kpbkrbnln"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/05/12"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T16:32:57.029Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/05/12"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-50749",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-06T15:27:02.065911Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:27:18.639Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Apache Answer",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "tonghuaroot"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Mattia Campanelli"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Cavan Loughran"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Xi Yang"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\u003c/p\u003eAny authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.\n\nAny authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T15:11:05.448Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ogk461yr4w9o95k15bkjxk2kpbkrbnln"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Answer: Missing authorization in revision audit reject allows authenticated users to reject pending revisions",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-50749",
"datePublished": "2026-08-05T15:11:05.448Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-06T16:56:13.231Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T15:27:21.369Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…