GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-3479 (GCVE-0-2026-3479)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-18 18:13 – Updated: 2026-04-07 22:01 Disputed
VLAI
Title
pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions
Summary
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
Severity
0 (None)
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-18 18:50 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Python Software Foundation CPython Affected: 0 , < 3.13.13 (python)
Affected: 3.14.0 , < 3.14.4 (python)
Affected: 3.15.0a1 , < 3.15.0a8 (python)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-3479",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-18T18:50:20.603616Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-22",
                "description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-18T18:50:41.609Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "modules": [
            "pkgutil"
          ],
          "product": "CPython",
          "vendor": "Python Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.13.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "python"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.14.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.14.0",
              "versionType": "python"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.15.0a8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.15.0a1",
              "versionType": "python"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eDISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003epkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\n\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
            "baseScore": 0,
            "baseSeverity": "NONE",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z",
        "orgId": "28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22",
        "shortName": "PSF"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "title": "pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.6.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22",
    "assignerShortName": "PSF",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-3479",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-18T18:13:42.288Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-03-03T14:18:35.394Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "date": "2026-09-15",
      "epss": "0.00238",
      "percentile": "0.14977"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-3479\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@python.org\",\"published\":\"2026-03-18T19:16:06.810\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T10:43:39.067\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@python.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\\n\\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"pkgutil.get_data() no valid\u00f3 el argumento de recurso como se document\u00f3, permitiendo recorridos de ruta.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"cna@python.org\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Python Software Foundation\",\"product\":\"CPython\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"modules\":[\"pkgutil\"],\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.13.13\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.14.0\",\"lessThan\":\"3.14.4\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"3.15.0a1\",\"lessThan\":\"3.15.0a8\",\"versionType\":\"python\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cna@python.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":0.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"NONE\",\"attackVector\":\"PHYSICAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-03-18T18:50:20.603616Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-3479\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-22\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/\",\"source\":\"cna@python.org\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-08-21T17:14:53+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "id": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-03-18T18:13:42.288000+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "13",
      "product_status:known_affected": "215",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "python: Python pkgutil.get_data(): Path Traversal via improper resource argument validation",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-3479.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "low",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-02T12:31:46Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "id": "CVE-2026-3479",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-03-22T00:26:13Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "559",
      "product_status:recommended": "804",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-3479",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-3479.json",
      "version": "31"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-3479\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-03-18T18:50:20.603616Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-03-18T18:49:24.573Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"tags\": [\"disputed\"], \"title\": \"pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 0, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"PHYSICAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"NONE\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Python Software Foundation\", \"modules\": [\"pkgutil\"], \"product\": \"CPython\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.13.13\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.14.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.14.4\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.15.0a1\", \"lessThan\": \"3.15.0a8\", \"versionType\": \"python\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.6.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\\n\\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eDISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003epkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22\", \"shortName\": \"PSF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-3479\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-07T22:01:35.724Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-03T14:18:35.394Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-03-18T18:13:42.288Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"PSF\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.