cve-2023-0401
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-02-08 19:00
Modified
2024-08-02 05:10
Severity ?
Summary
NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T05:10:55.825Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.0.8 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3b6dfd70db844c4499bec6ad6601623a565e674"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Hubert Kario (Red Hat)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Dmitry Belyavsky (Red Hat)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-02-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being\u003cbr\u003everified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash\u003cbr\u003ealgorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but\u003cbr\u003ethe implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest\u003cbr\u003einitialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return\u003cbr\u003evalue from the initialization function which later leads to invalid\u003cbr\u003eusage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS\u003cbr\u003eenabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading\u003cbr\u003ethe legacy provider.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the\u003cbr\u003etime stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does\u003cbr\u003enot call these functions however third party applications would be\u003cbr\u003eaffected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted\u003cbr\u003edata.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being\nverified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash\nalgorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but\nthe implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest\ninitialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return\nvalue from the initialization function which later leads to invalid\nusage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash.\n\nThe unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS\nenabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading\nthe legacy provider.\n\nPKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the\ntime stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does\nnot call these functions however third party applications would be\naffected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted\ndata.\n\n"
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Moderate"
            },
            "type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "NULL pointer deference",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-02-24T14:45:24.701Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.8 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3b6dfd70db844c4499bec6ad6601623a565e674"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "NULL dereference during PKCS7 data verification",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-0401",
    "datePublished": "2023-02-08T19:00:53.435Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-01-19T14:01:41.081Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T05:10:55.825Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-0401\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2023-02-08T20:15:24.323\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:37:07.127\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being\\nverified on PKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash\\nalgorithm used for the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but\\nthe implementation of the hash algorithm is not available the digest\\ninitialization will fail. There is a missing check for the return\\nvalue from the initialization function which later leads to invalid\\nusage of the digest API most likely leading to a crash.\\n\\nThe unavailability of an algorithm can be caused by using FIPS\\nenabled configuration of providers or more commonly by not loading\\nthe legacy provider.\\n\\nPKCS7 data is processed by the SMIME library calls and also by the\\ntime stamp (TS) library calls. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does\\nnot call these functions however third party applications would be\\naffected if they call these functions to verify signatures on untrusted\\ndata.\\n\\n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-476\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"3.0.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"26EF8A48-B8E5-4D4D-8054-445D65171EAC\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:stormshield:stormshield_management_center:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.3.3\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"62A933C5-C56E-485C-AD49-3B6A2C329131\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3b6dfd70db844c4499bec6ad6601623a565e674\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3b6dfd70db844c4499bec6ad6601623a565e674\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.