Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-12-01 - Updated: 2025-12-01
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions antérieures à 1.954.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Application Service | Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions antérieures à 1.134.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Operations Manager | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.5-build.398 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Operations Manager | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.2.1-build.271 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.954.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.134.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Application Service",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.5-build.398",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Operations Manager",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.1-build.271",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Operations Manager",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-12-01T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-12-01T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-1054",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-12-01T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36558",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36558"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36554",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36554"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36552",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36552"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36559",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36559"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36557",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36557"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36556",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36556"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36553",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36553"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-11-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36555",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36555"
}
]
}
CVE-2022-1292 (GCVE-0-2022-1292)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-03 15:15 – Updated: 2025-12-30 04:55
VLAI
EPSS
Title
The c_rehash script allows command injection
Summary
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Command injection
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
15 references
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-05-03 00:00
Credits
Elison Niven (Sophos)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-13T14:06:18.130Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.com/fraf0/cve-2022-1292-re_score-analysis"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220515 [SECURITY] [DLA 3008-1] openssl security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5139",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-b651cb69e6",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-c9c02865f6",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0011"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
}
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-1292",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2023-07-21T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-30T04:55:25.734Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Elison Niven (Sophos)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Moderate",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Command injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-02-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20220515 [SECURITY] [DLA 3008-1] openssl security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.html"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5139",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-b651cb69e6",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-c9c02865f6",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/"
},
{
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0011"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "The c_rehash script allows command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-1292",
"datePublished": "2022-05-03T15:15:19.758Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-30T04:55:25.734Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2022-1343 (GCVE-0-2022-1343)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-03 15:15 – Updated: 2025-05-05 16:42
VLAI
EPSS
Title
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
Summary
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Incorrect signature verfication
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-05-03 00:00
Credits
Raul Metsma
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:05.875Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-1343",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:27:12.804295Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:39.898Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Raul Metsma"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL \"ocsp\" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the \"-no_cert_checks\" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Moderate",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Incorrect signature verfication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-02-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-1343",
"datePublished": "2022-05-03T15:15:21.496Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:39.898Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-1434 (GCVE-0-2022-1434)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-03 15:15 – Updated: 2024-09-17 04:19
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite
Summary
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- Incorrect MAC key
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-05-03 00:00
Credits
Tom Colley (Broadcom)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:06.246Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7d56a74a96828985db7354a55227a511615f732b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Tom Colley (Broadcom)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Low",
"value": "Low"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Incorrect MAC key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-02-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7d56a74a96828985db7354a55227a511615f732b"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-1434",
"datePublished": "2022-05-03T15:15:23.387Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T04:19:38.052Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-1473 (GCVE-0-2022-1473)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-03 15:15 – Updated: 2025-05-05 16:42
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys
Summary
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Denial of Service
- CWE-459 - Incomplete Cleanup
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-05-03 00:00
Credits
Aliaksei Levin
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:03:06.287Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=64c85430f95200b6b51fe9475bd5203f7c19daf1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-1473",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:27:10.537811Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-459",
"description": "CWE-459 Incomplete Cleanup",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:05.402Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Aliaksei Levin"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Low",
"value": "Low"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Denial of Service",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-02-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=64c85430f95200b6b51fe9475bd5203f7c19daf1"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf"
}
],
"title": "Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-1473",
"datePublished": "2022-05-03T15:15:25.051Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:42:05.402Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-2068 (GCVE-0-2022-2068)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-06-21 14:45 – Updated: 2025-12-30 04:55
VLAI
EPSS
Title
The c_rehash script allows command injection
Summary
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Command injection
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
11 references
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-06-21 00:00
Credits
Chancen (Qingteng 73lab)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:45:47.155Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.com/fraf0/cve-2022-1292-re_score-analysis"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5169",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5169"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-3b7d0abd0b",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0008/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-41890e9e44",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf"
},
{
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Nov/0"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-2068",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2023-07-21T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-30T04:55:27.130Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Chancen (Qingteng 73lab)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-06-21T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Moderate",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Command injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-01-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5169",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5169"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-3b7d0abd0b",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0008/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-41890e9e44",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf"
}
],
"title": "The c_rehash script allows command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-2068",
"datePublished": "2022-06-21T14:45:20.597Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-06-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-30T04:55:27.130Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2022-2097 (GCVE-0-2022-2097)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-07-05 10:30 – Updated: 2024-09-17 01:06
VLAI
EPSS
Title
AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes
Summary
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p).
Severity
No CVSS data available.
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Fencepost error
Assigner
References
13 references
Impacted products
14 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4)
Affected: Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p) |
|
| openssl | openssl |
Affected:
1.1.1 , < 1.1.1q
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| openssl | openssl |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.0.5
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | ontap_antivirus_connector |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_antivirus_connector:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| fedoraproject | fedora |
Affected:
35
Affected: 36 cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:36:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | active_iq_unified_manager_for_vmware_vsphere |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager_for_vmware_vsphere:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | hci_baseboard_management_controller |
Affected:
h300s
Affected: h410c Affected: h410s Affected: h500s Affected: h700s cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h300s:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h410c:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h410s:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h500s:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h700s:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | brocade_fabric_operating_system_firmware |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:o:netapp:brocade_fabric_operating_system_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | snapcenter |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapcenter:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | oncommand_insight |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_insight:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | smi-s_provider |
Affected:
0
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| siemens | sinec_ins |
Affected:
0 , < 1.0_sp2_update_1
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_ins:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| debian | debian_linux |
Affected:
10.0
Affected: 11.0 cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2022-07-05 00:00
Credits
Alex Chernyakhovsky
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:24:44.189Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a98f339ddd7e8f487d6e0088d4a9a42324885a93"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=919925673d6c9cfed3c1085497f5dfbbed5fc431"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-3fdc2d3047",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V6567JERRHHJW2GNGJGKDRNHR7SNPZK7/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-89a17be281",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6CK57NBQFTPUMXAPJURCGXUYT76NQAK/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220715-0011/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-41890e9e44",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5343",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5343"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20230220 [SECURITY] [DLA 3325-1] openssl security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00019.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230420-0008/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1q",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_antivirus_connector:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "ontap_antivirus_connector",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "ontap_select_deploy_administration_utility",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "fedora",
"vendor": "fedoraproject",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "35"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "36"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager_for_vmware_vsphere:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "active_iq_unified_manager_for_vmware_vsphere",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h300s:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h410c:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h410s:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h500s:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:h700s:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "hci_baseboard_management_controller",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "h300s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "h410c"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "h410s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "h500s"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "h700s"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:netapp:brocade_fabric_operating_system_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "brocade_fabric_operating_system_firmware",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapcenter:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "snapcenter",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_insight:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "oncommand_insight",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "smi-s_provider",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:siemens:sinec_ins:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "sinec_ins",
"vendor": "siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0_sp2_update_1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "debian_linux",
"vendor": "debian",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-2097",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-26T19:45:07.166681Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T15:19:36.662Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4)"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Alex Chernyakhovsky"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn\u0027t written. In the special case of \"in place\" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#moderate",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Fencepost error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-21T19:07:25.963Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a98f339ddd7e8f487d6e0088d4a9a42324885a93"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=919925673d6c9cfed3c1085497f5dfbbed5fc431"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-3fdc2d3047",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V6567JERRHHJW2GNGJGKDRNHR7SNPZK7/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-89a17be281",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6CK57NBQFTPUMXAPJURCGXUYT76NQAK/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220715-0011/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-41890e9e44",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-02",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02"
},
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5343",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5343"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20230220 [SECURITY] [DLA 3325-1] openssl security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00019.html"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230420-0008/"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/"
}
],
"title": "AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-2097",
"datePublished": "2022-07-05T10:30:13.658Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-06-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T01:06:49.390Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-3358 (GCVE-0-2022-3358)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-10-11 15:00 – Updated: 2024-09-16 16:33
VLAI
EPSS
Title
Using a Custom Cipher with NID_undef may lead to NULL encryption
Summary
OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers. OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the ciphertext. Applications are only affected by this issue if they call EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.6 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5).
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- NULL encryption
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2022-09-29 00:00
Credits
Chris Rapier (Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center)
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:07:06.484Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221011.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=5485c56679d7c49b96e8fc8ca708b0b7e7c03c4b"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221028-0014/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202402-08",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.6 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Chris Rapier (Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-09-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers. OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the ciphertext. Applications are only affected by this issue if they call EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.6 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#Low",
"value": "Low"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "NULL encryption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-02-04T09:06:42.670Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221011.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=5485c56679d7c49b96e8fc8ca708b0b7e7c03c4b"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221028-0014/"
},
{
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202402-08",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
}
],
"title": "Using a Custom Cipher with NID_undef may lead to NULL encryption"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3358",
"datePublished": "2022-10-11T15:00:14.123Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T16:33:30.640Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-3602 (GCVE-0-2022-3602)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-11-01 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-14 08:58
VLAI
EPSS
Title
X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow
Summary
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Buffer overflow
- CWE-787 - Out-of-bounds Write
Assigner
References
42 references
Impacted products
10 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6)
|
|
| Siemens | Calibre ICE |
Affected:
V2022.4 , < V2023.1
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | Mcenter |
Affected:
V5.2.1 , < V5.3.0
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SICAM GridPass |
Affected:
V1.80 , < V2.20
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager |
Affected:
V2.13.0.0 , < V2.13.0.3
(custom)
|
Date Public
2022-11-01 00:00
Credits
Polar Bear
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T19:13:04.845Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fe3b639dc19b325846f4f6801f2f4604f56e3de3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/15"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/16"
},
{
"name": "20221028 Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: November 2022",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-W9sdCc2a"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/21"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/19"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/18"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/20"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/24"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/17"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202211-01",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202211-01"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023"
},
{
"name": "VU#794340",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/794340"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-0f1d2e0537",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DWP23EZYOBDJQP7HP4YU7W2ABU2YDITS/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-502f096dce",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/63YRPWPUSX3MBHNPIEJZDKQT6YA7UF6S/"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/6"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/7"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Fwd: Node.js security updates for all active release lines, November 2022",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/10"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/9"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169687/OpenSSL-Security-Advisory-20221101.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/12"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/11"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/15"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/14"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/13"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221102-0001/"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/7"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/6"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/9"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/10"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/11"
},
{
"url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00789.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-3602",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:56.588972Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:12:48.023Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Calibre ICE",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2023.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V2022.4",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Mcenter",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V5.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V5.2.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SICAM GridPass",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V1.80",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2.13.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V2.13.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-14T08:58:02.339Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-408105.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6)"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Polar Bear"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-11-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"lang": "eng",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#HIGH",
"value": "HIGH"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Buffer overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt"
},
{
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fe3b639dc19b325846f4f6801f2f4604f56e3de3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/15"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/16"
},
{
"name": "20221028 Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL Affecting Cisco Products: November 2022",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-W9sdCc2a"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/21"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/19"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/18"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/20"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/24"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/17"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202211-01",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202211-01"
},
{
"url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023"
},
{
"name": "VU#794340",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/794340"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-0f1d2e0537",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DWP23EZYOBDJQP7HP4YU7W2ABU2YDITS/"
},
{
"name": "FEDORA-2022-502f096dce",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/63YRPWPUSX3MBHNPIEJZDKQT6YA7UF6S/"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/6"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221101 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/7"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Fwd: Node.js security updates for all active release lines, November 2022",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/10"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/9"
},
{
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169687/OpenSSL-Security-Advisory-20221101.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/12"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/11"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/15"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/14"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/13"
},
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221102-0001/"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/1"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221102 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/2"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/3"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/5"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/7"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/6"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/9"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/10"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20221103 Re: OpenSSL X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3602), X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow (CVE-2022-3786)",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/11"
}
],
"title": "X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3602",
"datePublished": "2022-11-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-10-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-14T08:58:02.339Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2022-3786 (GCVE-0-2022-3786)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-11-01 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-14 08:58
VLAI
EPSS
Title
X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow
Summary
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- Buffer overflow
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
10 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.0.7
(semver)
|
|
| Siemens | Calibre ICE |
Affected:
V2022.4 , < V2023.1
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | Mcenter |
Affected:
V5.2.1 , < V5.3.0
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR) |
Affected:
V3.2.7 , < V3.2.8
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SICAM GridPass |
Affected:
V1.80 , < V2.20
(custom)
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager |
Affected:
V2.13.0.0 , < V2.13.0.3
(custom)
|
Date Public
2022-11-01 00:00
Credits
Viktor Dukhovni
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T19:13:08.687Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c42165b5706e42f67ef8ef4c351a9a4c5d21639a"
},
{
"url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00789.html"
},
{
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/794340"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-3786",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:26:54.639858Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-05T16:12:38.194Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Calibre ICE",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2023.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V2022.4",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Mcenter",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V5.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V5.2.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR)",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.2.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SICAM GridPass",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V1.80",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V2.13.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V2.13.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-14T08:58:03.787Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-408105.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-11-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.\u0027 character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.\u0027 character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.\n\n"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "HIGH"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#high"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Buffer overflow",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-11-04T07:28:32.835Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.0.7 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c42165b5706e42f67ef8ef4c351a9a4c5d21639a"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev",
"importer": "vulnxml2json5.py 2022-11-04 07:19:07.034873"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3786",
"datePublished": "2022-11-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-11-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-14T08:58:03.787Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2022-3996 (GCVE-0-2022-3996)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-12-13 15:43 – Updated: 2024-08-03 01:27
VLAI
EPSS
Title
X.509 Policy Constraints Double Locking
Summary
If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and
policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice
recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this
results in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy
processing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered
to be a common setup.
Policy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy'
argument to the command line utilities or by calling the
`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.
Update (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement
was corrected based on CVE-2023-0466.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-667 - Improper Locking
Assigner
References
3 references
Impacted products
8 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
3.0.0 , ≤ 3.0.7
(semver)
|
|
| openssl | openssl |
Affected:
3.0.0 , < 3.0.7
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | ontap_9 |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | fas\/aff_baseboard_management_controller |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:fas\/aff_baseboard_management_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | management_services_for_element_software |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:management_services_for_element_software:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | altavault_ost_plug-in |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:altavault_ost_plug-in:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | hci_baseboard_management_controller |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| netapp | smi-s_provider |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2022-12-13 07:00
Credits
Polar Bear
Paul Dale
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:27:54.475Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230203-0003/"
},
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221213.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7725e7bfe6f2ce8146b6552b44e0d226be7638e7"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "openssl",
"vendor": "openssl",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:ontap_9:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "ontap_9",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:fas\\/aff_baseboard_management_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "fas\\/aff_baseboard_management_controller",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:management_services_for_element_software:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "management_services_for_element_software",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:altavault_ost_plug-in:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "altavault_ost_plug-in",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_baseboard_management_controller:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "hci_baseboard_management_controller",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "smi-s_provider",
"vendor": "netapp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-3996",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-08-01T21:11:25.058550Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T21:18:41.599Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.0.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Polar Bear"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Paul Dale"
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-12-13T07:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and\u003cbr\u003epolicy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice\u003cbr\u003erecursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this\u003cbr\u003eresults in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy\u003cbr\u003eprocessing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered\u003cbr\u003eto be a common setup.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003ePolicy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy\u0027\u003cbr\u003eargument to the command line utilities or by calling the\u003cbr\u003e`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUpdate (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement\u003cbr\u003ewas corrected based on CVE-2023-0466."
}
],
"value": "If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and\npolicy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice\nrecursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this\nresults in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy\nprocessing being enabled on a publicly facing server is not considered\nto be a common setup.\n\nPolicy processing is enabled by passing the `-policy\u0027\nargument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function.\n\nUpdate (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement\nwas corrected based on CVE-2023-0466."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html#low"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-667",
"description": "CWE-667 Improper Locking",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-03-31T09:50:45.685Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221213.txt"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7725e7bfe6f2ce8146b6552b44e0d226be7638e7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "X.509 Policy Constraints Double Locking",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-3996",
"datePublished": "2022-12-13T15:43:06.821Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-11-15T11:47:05.740Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T01:27:54.475Z",
"requesterUserId": "b0d835d1-bcd6-467d-a017-37d7df925f4b",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Trend slope:
-
(linear fit over daily sighting counts)
Show additional events:
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…