CVE-2015-8960 (GCVE-0-2015-8960)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2016-09-21 01:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 08:36
VLAI
Summary
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2015-11-08 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T08:36:30.681Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20160920 Re: Possible CVE for TLS protocol issue",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433"
          },
          {
            "name": "93071",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://kcitls.org"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2015-11-08T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2018-06-27T09:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20160920 Re: Possible CVE for TLS protocol issue",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433"
        },
        {
          "name": "93071",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://kcitls.org"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-8960",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20160920 Re: Possible CVE for TLS protocol issue",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433"
            },
            {
              "name": "93071",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://kcitls.org",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://kcitls.org"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2015-8960",
    "datePublished": "2016-09-21T01:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2016-09-20T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T08:36:30.681Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2015-8960",
      "date": "2026-05-29",
      "epss": "0.00327",
      "percentile": "0.55892"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"operator\": \"AND\", \"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:ietf:transport_layer_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"1.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B20CCEB2-5534-4263-ACEA-C0A928CB6414\"}]}, {\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apple:safari:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"AFDA34B4-65B4-41A5-AC22-667C8D8FF4B7\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"39B565E1-C2F1-44FC-A517-E3130332B17C\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:internet_explorer:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C37BA825-679F-4257-9F2B-CE2318B75396\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"97D4FFCF-5309-43B6-9FD5-680C6D535A7F\"}, {\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:opera:opera_browser:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"4545786D-3129-4D92-B218-F4A92428ED48\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"62347994-1353-497C-9C4A-D5D8D95F67E8\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:data_ontap_edge:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"E0C4B1E5-75BF-43AE-BBAC-0DD4124C71ED\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:host_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"546855F3-654C-48F0-B3A0-FF1ABBF04007\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_shift:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"3BD81527-A341-42C3-9AB9-880D3DB04B08\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:plug-in_for_symantec_netbackup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"FFE0A9D2-9A49-4BF6-BC6F-8249162D8334\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"4BB0FDCF-3750-44C6-AC5C-0CC2AAD14093\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snap_creator_framework:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"9F4754FB-E3EB-454A-AB1A-AE3835C5350C\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:unix:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"61D7EF01-F618-497F-9375-8003CEA3D380\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"BEDE62C6-D571-4AF8-B85E-CBBCE4AF98B5\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:oracle:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"26A2B713-7D6D-420A-93A4-E0D983C983DF\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:sap:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"64DE38C8-94F1-4860-B045-F33928F676A8\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapprotect:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F74F467A-0C81-40D9-BA06-40FB8EF02C04\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\\\\\u0026_hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D6D700C5-F67F-4FFB-BE69-D524592A3D2E\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:system_setup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"459CF8B6-B815-42EA-A286-6E737529D9AC\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \\\"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\\\" issue.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"El protocolo TLS 1.2 y versiones anteriores soporta los valores rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh y ecdsa_fixed_ecdh para ClientCertificateType pero no documenta directamente la habilidad para computar el secreto maestro en determinadas situaciones con una clave de cliente secreta y una clave p\\u00fablica de servidor pero no una clave secreta de servidor, lo que facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores TLS aprovechando el conocimiento de la clave secreta para un certificado cliente X.509 arbitrariamente instalado, tambi\\u00e9n conocido como problema \\\"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\\\".\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2015-8960",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:39:32.840",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 5.9}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 6.8, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 6.4, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2016-09-21T02:59:00.133",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Press/Media Coverage\", \"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://kcitls.org\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Technical Description\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mitigation\", \"Technical Description\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Press/Media Coverage\", \"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Technical Description\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://kcitls.org\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Technical Description\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mitigation\", \"Technical Description\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2015-8960\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2016-09-21T02:59:00.133\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-06T22:30:45.220\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \\\"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\\\" issue.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El protocolo TLS 1.2 y versiones anteriores soporta los valores rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh y ecdsa_fixed_ecdh para ClientCertificateType pero no documenta directamente la habilidad para computar el secreto maestro en determinadas situaciones con una clave de cliente secreta y una clave p\u00fablica de servidor pero no una clave secreta de servidor, lo que facilita a atacantes man-in-the-middle suplantar servidores TLS aprovechando el conocimiento de la clave secreta para un certificado cliente X.509 arbitrariamente instalado, tambi\u00e9n conocido como problema \\\"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\\\".\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.8,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:ietf:transport_layer_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B20CCEB2-5534-4263-ACEA-C0A928CB6414\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apple:safari:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"AFDA34B4-65B4-41A5-AC22-667C8D8FF4B7\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"39B565E1-C2F1-44FC-A517-E3130332B17C\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:internet_explorer:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C37BA825-679F-4257-9F2B-CE2318B75396\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"97D4FFCF-5309-43B6-9FD5-680C6D535A7F\"},{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:opera:opera_browser:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4545786D-3129-4D92-B218-F4A92428ED48\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"62347994-1353-497C-9C4A-D5D8D95F67E8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:data_ontap_edge:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E0C4B1E5-75BF-43AE-BBAC-0DD4124C71ED\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:host_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"546855F3-654C-48F0-B3A0-FF1ABBF04007\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_shift:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3BD81527-A341-42C3-9AB9-880D3DB04B08\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:plug-in_for_symantec_netbackup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"FFE0A9D2-9A49-4BF6-BC6F-8249162D8334\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4BB0FDCF-3750-44C6-AC5C-0CC2AAD14093\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snap_creator_framework:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9F4754FB-E3EB-454A-AB1A-AE3835C5350C\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:unix:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"61D7EF01-F618-497F-9375-8003CEA3D380\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"BEDE62C6-D571-4AF8-B85E-CBBCE4AF98B5\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:oracle:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"26A2B713-7D6D-420A-93A4-E0D983C983DF\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:sap:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"64DE38C8-94F1-4860-B045-F33928F676A8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapprotect:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F74F467A-0C81-40D9-BA06-40FB8EF02C04\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\\\\\u0026_hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D6D700C5-F67F-4FFB-BE69-D524592A3D2E\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:netapp:system_setup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"459CF8B6-B815-42EA-A286-6E737529D9AC\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Press/Media Coverage\",\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://kcitls.org\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mitigation\",\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Press/Media Coverage\",\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Technical Description\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://kcitls.org\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Technical Description\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mitigation\",\"Technical Description\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.