gsd-2015-8960
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2015-8960",
"description": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue.",
"id": "GSD-2015-8960",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8960.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-8960"
],
"details": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue.",
"id": "GSD-2015-8960",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:03.106932Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2015-8960",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160920 Re: Possible CVE for TLS protocol issue",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4"
},
{
"name": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433"
},
{
"name": "93071",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/"
},
{
"name": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf"
},
{
"name": "https://kcitls.org",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://kcitls.org"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:transport_layer_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "1.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apple:safari:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:internet_explorer:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:mozilla:firefox:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:opera:opera_browser:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snap_creator_framework:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:data_ontap_edge:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:unix:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:oracle:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:sap:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:host_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapdrive:-:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\\\u0026_hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapprotect:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_shift:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:plug-in_for_symantec_netbackup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:system_setup:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2015-8960"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the \"Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)\" issue."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Mitigation",
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot15/woot15-paper-hlauschek.pdf"
},
{
"name": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Press/Media Coverage",
"Technical Description",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/statuses/630908726950674433"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20160920 Re: Possible CVE for TLS protocol issue",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Technical Description",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/20/4"
},
{
"name": "https://kcitls.org",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://kcitls.org"
},
{
"name": "93071",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Broken Link",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93071"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180626-0002/"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-01-30T17:33Z",
"publishedDate": "2016-09-21T02:59Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.