cnvd - cnvd-2024-26543

cnvd-2024-26543

Vulnerability from cnvd

Title: Apache Kafka拒绝拒绝漏洞

Description:

Apache Kafka是美国阿帕奇（Apache）基金会的一套开源的分布式流媒体平台。该平台能够获取实时数据，用于构建对数据流的变化进行实时反应的应用程序。

Apache Kafka存在拒绝拒绝漏洞，该漏洞源于当Apache Kafka集群从ZooKeeper模式迁移到KRaft模式时，ACL将无法正确执行。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务。

Severity: 高

Patch Name: Apache Kafka拒绝拒绝漏洞的补丁

Patch Description:

Apache Kafka存在拒绝拒绝漏洞，该漏洞源于当Apache Kafka集群从ZooKeeper模式迁移到KRaft模式时，ACL将无法正确执行。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务。目前，供应商发布了安全公告及相关补丁信息，修复了此漏洞。

Formal description:

厂商已发布了漏洞修复程序，请及时关注更新： https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy

Reference: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy

Impacted products

Name
['Apache Kafka 3.5.0', 'Apache Kafka 3.5.1', 'Apache Kafka 3.5.2', 'Apache Kafka 3.6.0', 'Apache Kafka 3.6.1']

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2024-27309",
      "cveUrl": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27309"
    }
  },
  "description": "Apache Kafka\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6d41\u5a92\u4f53\u5e73\u53f0\u3002\u8be5\u5e73\u53f0\u80fd\u591f\u83b7\u53d6\u5b9e\u65f6\u6570\u636e\uff0c\u7528\u4e8e\u6784\u5efa\u5bf9\u6570\u636e\u6d41\u7684\u53d8\u5316\u8fdb\u884c\u5b9e\u65f6\u53cd\u5e94\u7684\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u3002\n\nApache Kafka\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u62d2\u7edd\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u5f53Apache Kafka\u96c6\u7fa4\u4eceZooKeeper\u6a21\u5f0f\u8fc1\u79fb\u5230KRaft\u6a21\u5f0f\u65f6\uff0cACL\u5c06\u65e0\u6cd5\u6b63\u786e\u6267\u884c\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5df2\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u590d\u7a0b\u5e8f\uff0c\u8bf7\u53ca\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2024-26543",
  "openTime": "2024-06-14",
  "patchDescription": "Apache Kafka\u662f\u7f8e\u56fd\u963f\u5e15\u5947\uff08Apache\uff09\u57fa\u91d1\u4f1a\u7684\u4e00\u5957\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u5206\u5e03\u5f0f\u6d41\u5a92\u4f53\u5e73\u53f0\u3002\u8be5\u5e73\u53f0\u80fd\u591f\u83b7\u53d6\u5b9e\u65f6\u6570\u636e\uff0c\u7528\u4e8e\u6784\u5efa\u5bf9\u6570\u636e\u6d41\u7684\u53d8\u5316\u8fdb\u884c\u5b9e\u65f6\u53cd\u5e94\u7684\u5e94\u7528\u7a0b\u5e8f\u3002\r\n\r\nApache Kafka\u5b58\u5728\u62d2\u7edd\u62d2\u7edd\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8e\u5f53Apache Kafka\u96c6\u7fa4\u4eceZooKeeper\u6a21\u5f0f\u8fc1\u79fb\u5230KRaft\u6a21\u5f0f\u65f6\uff0cACL\u5c06\u65e0\u6cd5\u6b63\u786e\u6267\u884c\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u9020\u6210\u62d2\u7edd\u670d\u52a1\u3002\u76ee\u524d\uff0c\u4f9b\u5e94\u5546\u53d1\u5e03\u4e86\u5b89\u5168\u516c\u544a\u53ca\u76f8\u5173\u8865\u4e01\u4fe1\u606f\uff0c\u4fee\u590d\u4e86\u6b64\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002",
  "patchName": "Apache Kafka\u62d2\u7edd\u62d2\u7edd\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684\u8865\u4e01",
  "products": {
    "product": [
      "Apache Kafka 3.5.0",
      "Apache Kafka 3.5.1",
      "Apache Kafka 3.5.2",
      "Apache Kafka 3.6.0",
      "Apache Kafka 3.6.1"
    ]
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2024-04-16",
  "title": "Apache Kafka\u62d2\u7edd\u62d2\u7edd\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2024-27309 (GCVE-0-2024-27309)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2024-04-12 06:58

Modified

2025-07-30 03:55

Severity ?

CWE

CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization

Summary

While an Apache Kafka cluster is being migrated from ZooKeeper mode to KRaft mode, in some cases ACLs will not be correctly enforced. Two preconditions are needed to trigger the bug: 1. The administrator decides to remove an ACL 2. The resource associated with the removed ACL continues to have two or more other ACLs associated with it after the removal. When those two preconditions are met, Kafka will treat the resource as if it had only one ACL associated with it after the removal, rather than the two or more that would be correct. The incorrect condition is cleared by removing all brokers in ZK mode, or by adding a new ACL to the affected resource. Once the migration is completed, there is no metadata loss (the ACLs all remain). The full impact depends on the ACLs in use. If only ALLOW ACLs were configured during the migration, the impact would be limited to availability impact. if DENY ACLs were configured, the impact could include confidentiality and integrity impact depending on the ACLs configured, as the DENY ACLs might be ignored due to this vulnerability during the migration period.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy	vendor-advisory
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/3
	https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240705-0002/

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	Apache Software Foundation	Apache Kafka	Version: 3.5.0 ≤ 3.5.2 Version: 3.6.0 ≤ 3.6.1

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:apache:kafka:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
            "product": "kafka",
            "vendor": "apache",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "3.5.2",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "3.5.0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              },
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "3.6.1",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "3.6.0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 7.4,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-27309",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-29T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T03:55:45.408Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:28:00.345Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/3"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240705-0002/"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Apache Kafka",
          "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.5.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "3.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eWhile an Apache Kafka cluster is being migrated from ZooKeeper mode to KRaft mode, in some cases ACLs will not be correctly enforced.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTwo preconditions are needed to trigger the bug:\u003cbr\u003e1. The administrator decides to remove an ACL\u003cbr\u003e2. The resource associated with the removed ACL continues to have two or more other ACLs associated with it after the removal.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eWhen those two preconditions are met, Kafka will treat the resource as if it had only one ACL associated with it after the removal, rather than the two or more that would be correct.\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe incorrect condition is cleared by removing all brokers in ZK mode, or by adding a new ACL to the affected resource. Once the migration is completed, there is no metadata loss (the ACLs all remain).\u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe full impact depends on the ACLs in use. If only ALLOW ACLs were configured during the migration, the impact would be limited to availability impact. if DENY ACLs were configured, the impact could include confidentiality and integrity impact depending on the ACLs configured, as the DENY ACLs might be ignored due to this vulnerability during the migration period.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "While an Apache Kafka cluster is being migrated from ZooKeeper mode to KRaft mode, in some cases ACLs will not be correctly enforced.\n\nTwo preconditions are needed to trigger the bug:\n1. The administrator decides to remove an ACL\n2. The resource associated with the removed ACL continues to have two or more other ACLs associated with it after the removal.\n\nWhen those two preconditions are met, Kafka will treat the resource as if it had only one ACL associated with it after the removal, rather than the two or more that would be correct.\n\nThe incorrect condition is cleared by removing all brokers in ZK mode, or by adding a new ACL to the affected resource. Once the migration is completed, there is no metadata loss (the ACLs all remain).\n\nThe full impact depends on the ACLs in use. If only ALLOW ACLs were configured during the migration, the impact would be limited to availability impact. if DENY ACLs were configured, the impact could include confidentiality and integrity impact depending on the ACLs configured, as the DENY ACLs might be ignored due to this vulnerability during the migration period."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "critical"
            },
            "type": "Textual description of severity"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-07-05T16:06:03.962Z",
        "orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
        "shortName": "apache"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/6536rmzyg076lzzdw2xdktvnz163mjpy"
        },
        {
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/12/3"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240705-0002/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Apache Kafka: Potential incorrect access control during migration from ZK mode to KRaft mode",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
    "assignerShortName": "apache",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-27309",
    "datePublished": "2024-04-12T06:58:45.134Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-02-22T18:32:26.014Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T03:55:45.408Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted