CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8272 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FX5X-5QPW-C2P3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-02 21:30 – Updated: 2024-09-03 18:31D-Link DAP-2310 Hardware A Firmware 1.16RC028 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a stack-based buffer overflow in the ATP binary that handles PHP HTTP GET requests for the Apache HTTP Server (httpd). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45623"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-02T21:15:11Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "D-Link DAP-2310 Hardware A Firmware 1.16RC028 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a stack-based buffer overflow in the ATP binary that handles PHP HTTP GET requests for the Apache HTTP Server (httpd). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.",
"id": "GHSA-fx5x-5qpw-c2p3",
"modified": "2024-09-03T18:31:32Z",
"published": "2024-09-02T21:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45623"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportannouncement.us.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10406"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FX6V-JRPQ-F762
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-14 15:31 – Updated: 2025-05-17 15:30Netgate pfSense CE (prior to 2.8.0 beta release) and corresponding Plus builds are vulnerable to command injection in the OpenVPN widget due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input to the OpenVPN management interface. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary OpenVPN management commands via the remipp parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-54780"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-14T14:15:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Netgate pfSense CE (prior to 2.8.0 beta release) and corresponding Plus builds are vulnerable to command injection in the OpenVPN widget due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input to the OpenVPN management interface. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary OpenVPN management commands via the remipp parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-fx6v-jrpq-f762",
"modified": "2025-05-17T15:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-05-14T15:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54780"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.brillantit.com/exploiting-pfsense-xss-command-injection-cloud-hijack"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.netgate.com/blog/important-security-updates-for-pfsense-plus-24.11-and-ce-2.7.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://netgate.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FX89-QJ4V-348G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:26 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:26phpMyBackupPro before 2.5 does not validate integer input, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by injecting scripts via the path, filename, and period parameters to scheduled.php, and making requests to injected scripts, or by injecting PHP into a PHP configuration variable via a PHP variable variable.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-3638"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-07-21T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "phpMyBackupPro before 2.5 does not validate integer input, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by injecting scripts via the path, filename, and period parameters to scheduled.php, and making requests to injected scripts, or by injecting PHP into a PHP configuration variable via a PHP variable variable.",
"id": "GHSA-fx89-qj4v-348g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:26:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:26:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3638"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/25/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/04/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032250"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FXC2-8M62-M85X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-22 21:31 – Updated: 2025-01-21 17:58An issue was discovered in llama_index before 0.10.38. download/integration.py includes an exec call for import {cls_name}.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "llama-index-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.10.38"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45201"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-08-23T18:54:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-22T20:15:10Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in llama_index before 0.10.38. `download/integration.py` includes an exec call for `import {cls_name}`.",
"id": "GHSA-fxc2-8m62-m85x",
"modified": "2025-01-21T17:58:30Z",
"published": "2024-08-22T21:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/run-llama/llama_index/pull/13523"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/run-llama/llama_index/commit/bd827c30484fa085ec769fa55dc7f2add8006ac8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/llama-index/PYSEC-2024-192.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/run-llama/llama_index"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/run-llama/llama_index/compare/v0.10.37...v0.10.38"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "LlamaIndex includes an exec call for `import {cls_name}`"
}
GHSA-FXCM-GF29-76G5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-03 03:06 – Updated: 2022-05-03 03:06The prompt parsing in bash allows a local user to execute commands as another user by creating a directory with the name of the command to execute.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-1999-0491"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "1999-04-20T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The prompt parsing in bash allows a local user to execute commands as another user by creating a directory with the name of the command to execute.",
"id": "GHSA-fxcm-gf29-76g5",
"modified": "2022-05-03T03:06:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-03T03:06:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-1999-0491"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/119"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=Pine.LNX.4.10.9904202114070.6623-100000@smooth.Operator.org"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FXH3-9V44-3M3R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-18 15:30 – Updated: 2025-03-18 15:30An improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') vulnerability [CWE-94] in FortiSOAR Connector FortiSOAR 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the host via a playbook code snippet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-21760"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-18T14:15:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An improper control of generation of code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability [CWE-94]\u00a0in\u00a0FortiSOAR Connector FortiSOAR 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow\u00a0an authenticated attacker\u00a0to execute arbitrary code on the host via a playbook code snippet.",
"id": "GHSA-fxh3-9v44-3m3r",
"modified": "2025-03-18T15:30:47Z",
"published": "2025-03-18T15:30:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-21760"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-23-420"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FXHV-24W8-XQ5W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:02 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:02Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Journal file, aka "Windows Journal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability," a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1675, CVE-2015-1696, CVE-2015-1697, CVE-2015-1698, and CVE-2015-1699.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-1695"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-05-13T10:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Journal file, aka \"Windows Journal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1675, CVE-2015-1696, CVE-2015-1697, CVE-2015-1698, and CVE-2015-1699.",
"id": "GHSA-fxhv-24w8-xq5w",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:02:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:02:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1695"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2015/ms15-045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032280"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FXM8-PV9Q-R8R2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:45 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:45PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in Admin/ADM_Pagina.php in OTManager 2.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the Tipo parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5063"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-11-13T11:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in Admin/ADM_Pagina.php in OTManager 2.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the Tipo parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-fxm8-pv9q-r8r2",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:45:48Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:45:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5063"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/49850"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32645"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7077"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32235"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3093"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FXMW-JCGR-W44V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-11 21:31 – Updated: 2025-12-12 16:42The PLAIN restore meta-command filter introduced in pgAdmin as part of the fix for CVE-2025-12762 does not detect meta-commands when a SQL file begins with a UTF-8 Byte Order Mark (EF BB BF) or other special byte sequences. The implemented filter uses the function has_meta_commands(), which scans raw bytes using a regular expression. The regex does not treat the bytes as ignorable, so meta-commands such as \\! remain undetected. When pgAdmin invokes psql with --file, psql strips the bytes and executes the command. This can result in remote command execution during a restore operation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pgadmin4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-13780"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-12T16:42:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-11T19:15:52Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The PLAIN restore meta-command filter introduced in pgAdmin as part of the fix for CVE-2025-12762 does not detect meta-commands when a SQL file begins with a UTF-8 Byte Order Mark (EF BB BF) or other special byte sequences. The implemented filter uses the function `has_meta_commands()`, which scans raw bytes using a regular expression. The regex does not treat the bytes as ignorable, so meta-commands such as `\\\\!` remain undetected. When pgAdmin invokes psql with --file, psql strips the bytes and executes the command. This can result in remote command execution during a restore operation.",
"id": "GHSA-fxmw-jcgr-w44v",
"modified": "2025-12-12T16:42:54Z",
"published": "2025-12-11T21:31:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13780"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/9368"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/pull/9426"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/1d397395f75320ca1d4ed5e9ca721c603415e836"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/d5a909f14cb9713d89b49481ad1929fad89f4576"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "pgadmin4 has a Meta-Command Filter Command Execution"
}
GHSA-FXR5-7G6J-CJ5F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 19:24 – Updated: 2024-04-04 05:37A CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability exists that allows remote code execution via the “hostname” parameter when maliciously crafted hostname syntax is entered.
Affected products: StruxureWare Data Center Expert (V7.9.2 and prior)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-25550"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-18T21:15:08Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability exists that\nallows remote code execution via the \u201chostname\u201d parameter when maliciously crafted hostname\nsyntax is entered.\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n Affected products: StruxureWare Data Center Expert (V7.9.2 and prior)\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-fxr5-7g6j-cj5f",
"modified": "2024-04-04T05:37:05Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T19:24:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-25550"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2023-045-02\u0026p_enDocType=Security+and+Safety+Notice\u0026p_File_Name=SEVD-2023-045-02.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.