CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
8289 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-F78F-353M-CF4J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-10 20:05 – Updated: 2026-01-23 20:52node-rules including 3.0.0 and prior to 5.0.0 allows injection of arbitrary commands. The argument rules of function "fromJSON()" can be controlled by users without any sanitization.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "node-rules"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-7609"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-25T20:34:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-04-27T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "node-rules including 3.0.0 and prior to 5.0.0 allows injection of arbitrary commands. The argument rules of function \"fromJSON()\" can be controlled by users without any sanitization.",
"id": "GHSA-f78f-353m-cf4j",
"modified": "2026-01-23T20:52:25Z",
"published": "2021-12-10T20:05:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7609"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mithunsatheesh/node-rules/issues/84"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mithunsatheesh/node-rules/commit/100862223904bb6478fcc33b701c7dee11f7b832"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NODERULES-560426"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Code Injection in node-rules"
}
GHSA-F78F-8M3F-69XH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:36 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:36The DHTML Editing Component ActiveX control in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2 does not properly format HTML markup, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site that triggers "system state" corruption, aka "DHTML Editing Component ActiveX Control Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-2519"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-09-08T22:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The DHTML Editing Component ActiveX control in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2 does not properly format HTML markup, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site that triggers \"system state\" corruption, aka \"DHTML Editing Component ActiveX Control Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-f78f-8m3f-69xh",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:36:05Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:36:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2519"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-046"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6271"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36280"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022843"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-251A.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-F7CF-4VWJ-VVW2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:34 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:34Buffer overflow in the RegistryString function in the HPISDataManagerLib.Datamgr ActiveX control in HPISDataManager.dll in HP Instant Support before 1.0.0.24 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long first argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-5604, CVE-2007-5605, and CVE-2007-5606.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5607"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-06-04T20:32:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the RegistryString function in the HPISDataManagerLib.Datamgr ActiveX control in HPISDataManager.dll in HP Instant Support before 1.0.0.24 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long first argument, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-5604, CVE-2007-5605, and CVE-2007-5606.",
"id": "GHSA-f7cf-4vwj-vvw2",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:34:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:34:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5607"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30516"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.csis.dk/dk/forside/CSIS-RI-0003.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/526131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29526"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29534"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1740/references"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www12.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c01422264"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-F7CX-4C4G-9G59
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-18 15:31 – Updated: 2026-02-18 18:30An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the Code Stream directive functionality of OpenCFD OpenFOAM 2506. A specially crafted OpenFOAM simulation file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-61982"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-18T15:18:39Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the Code Stream directive functionality of OpenCFD OpenFOAM 2506. A specially crafted OpenFOAM simulation file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-f7cx-4c4g-9g59",
"modified": "2026-02-18T18:30:38Z",
"published": "2026-02-18T15:31:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61982"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2292"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7HH-5VC2-H86F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:42 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:42Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.01 and 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by instantiating certain COM objects from Urlmon.dll, which triggers memory corruption during a call to the IObjectSafety function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-0218"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-06-12T19:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.01 and 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by instantiating certain COM objects from Urlmon.dll, which triggers memory corruption during a call to the IObjectSafety function.",
"id": "GHSA-f7hh-5vc2-h86f",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:42:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:42:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-0218"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-033"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32106"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1084"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/35348"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25627"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1018235"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/471947/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24372"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-163A.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2153"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-F7R3-8XGV-QXR2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-25 21:30Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Jonathan Daggerhart Widget Wrangler widget-wrangler allows Code Injection.This issue affects Widget Wrangler: from n/a through <= 2.3.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25447"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T17:16:50Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Jonathan Daggerhart Widget Wrangler widget-wrangler allows Code Injection.This issue affects Widget Wrangler: from n/a through \u003c= 2.3.9.",
"id": "GHSA-f7r3-8xgv-qxr2",
"modified": "2026-03-25T21:30:34Z",
"published": "2026-03-25T18:31:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/widget-wrangler/vulnerability/wordpress-widget-wrangler-plugin-2-3-9-remote-code-execution-rce-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7RC-79MV-V26V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-30 21:30 – Updated: 2024-10-31 18:31The eladmin v2.7 and before contains a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability that can control all application deployment servers of this management system via DeployController.java.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-51243"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-30T21:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The eladmin v2.7 and before contains a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability that can control all application deployment servers of this management system via DeployController.java.",
"id": "GHSA-f7rc-79mv-v26v",
"modified": "2024-10-31T18:31:18Z",
"published": "2024-10-30T21:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shadia0/Patienc/blob/main/eladmin_rce.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F7RQ-858V-8R8M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:21 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:21IBM Security QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute code remotely with lower level privileges under unusual circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 134810.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-1721"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-04-26T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Security QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute code remotely with lower level privileges under unusual circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 134810.",
"id": "GHSA-f7rq-858v-8r8m",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:21:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:21:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-1721"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/134810"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22015799"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F86V-54PM-58Q4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-18 15:31 – Updated: 2026-02-18 15:31NVIDIA NeMo Framework contains a vulnerability where malicious data created by an attacker could cause code injection. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-33236"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-18T14:16:02Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "NVIDIA NeMo Framework contains a vulnerability where malicious data created by an attacker could cause code injection. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.",
"id": "GHSA-f86v-54pm-58q4",
"modified": "2026-02-18T15:31:25Z",
"published": "2026-02-18T15:31:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-33236"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33236"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F89C-82XP-M4W3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:33 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:33Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the Quoc-Huy MP3 Allopass (com_mp3_allopass) 1.0 component for Joomla! allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_live_site parameter to (1) allopass.php and (2) allopass-error.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5412"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-10-12T18:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the Quoc-Huy MP3 Allopass (com_mp3_allopass) 1.0 component for Joomla! allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_live_site parameter to (1) allopass.php and (2) allopass-error.php.",
"id": "GHSA-f89c-82xp-m4w3",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:33:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:33:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5412"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37054"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/43630"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/43631"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26002"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.