Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-285
DiscouragedImproper Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
2517 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-76999 (GCVE-0-2026-76999)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-20 15:45 – Updated: 2026-08-20 17:43 X_Freeware
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics index.php add_grade improper authorization
Summary
A vulnerability was detected in SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0. This affects the function add_grade of the file /index.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument student_id results in improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-20 17:43 UTC
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/393622 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/393622/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-76999 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/880522 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.sourcecodester.com/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SourceCodester | CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics |
Affected:
1.0
cpe:2.3:a:sourcecodester:cet_automated_grading_system_with_ai_predictive_analytics:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-76999",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T17:43:48.819815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:43:57.887Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/880522"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:sourcecodester:cet_automated_grading_system_with_ai_predictive_analytics:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics",
"vendor": "SourceCodester",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Yogender (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB Vulnerability Moderation Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was detected in SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0. This affects the function add_grade of the file /index.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument student_id results in improper authorization. The attack can be initiated remotely."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:X/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:ND/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-266",
"description": "Incorrect Privilege Assignment",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T15:45:08.190Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-393622 | SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics index.php add_grade improper authorization",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/393622"
},
{
"name": "VDB-393622 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/393622/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-76999 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-76999"
},
{
"name": "Submit #880522 | SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0 Improper Access Control",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/880522"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.sourcecodester.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"x_freeware"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-20T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-08-20T09:25:38.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics index.php add_grade improper authorization",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202608"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-76999",
"datePublished": "2026-08-20T15:45:08.190Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-20T07:20:32.280Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:43:57.887Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-76352 (GCVE-0-2026-76352)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-19 21:34 – Updated: 2026-08-21 03:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Improper Authorization through the REST API in Splunk Enterprise
Summary
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could create or modify a scripted lookup through generic configuration endpoints and run an installed lookup script with the permissions of the user account running Splunk Enterprise, which could allow for access to all relevant data and affect system integrity and availability. The vulnerability is possible because the generic transforms configuration endpoints do not enforce the capabilities required to create or edit external lookup definitions. For more information see Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) and limits.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.4/configuration-file-reference/10.4.2-configuration-file-reference/limits.conf) in the Splunk documentation.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-20 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - The software does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk | Splunk Enterprise |
Affected:
10.4 , < 10.4.2
(custom)
Affected: 10.2 , < 10.2.6 (custom) Affected: 10.0 , < 10.0.9 (custom) Affected: 9.4 , < 9.4.14 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-08-19 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-76352",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-21T03:56:08.865Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Splunk Enterprise",
"vendor": "Splunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.4",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.0.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.4.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.4",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could create or modify a scripted lookup through generic configuration endpoints and run an installed lookup script with the permissions of the user account running Splunk Enterprise, which could allow for access to all relevant data and affect system integrity and availability. The vulnerability is possible because the generic transforms configuration endpoints do not enforce the capabilities required to create or edit external lookup definitions. For more information see [Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) and [limits.conf](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.4/configuration-file-reference/10.4.2-configuration-file-reference/limits.conf) in the Splunk documentation."
}
],
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could create or modify a scripted lookup through generic configuration endpoints and run an installed lookup script with the permissions of the user account running Splunk Enterprise, which could allow for access to all relevant data and affect system integrity and availability. The vulnerability is possible because the generic transforms configuration endpoints do not enforce the capabilities required to create or edit external lookup definitions. For more information see Define roles on the Splunk platform with capabilities (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/define-roles-on-the-splunk-platform-with-capabilities) and limits.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.4/configuration-file-reference/10.4.2-configuration-file-reference/limits.conf) in the Splunk documentation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "The software does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T21:34:46.069Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to versions 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, or higher.\n\nAfter upgrading, set `scripted_lookup_raw_write_enforcement = block` in the `limits.conf` configuration file under `[lookup]`, and then restart Splunk Enterprise."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "SVD-2026-0801"
},
"title": "Improper Authorization through the REST API in Splunk Enterprise"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-76352",
"datePublished": "2026-08-19T21:34:46.069Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-19T12:02:03.628Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-21T03:56:08.865Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-76243 (GCVE-0-2026-76243)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-19 14:02 – Updated: 2026-08-25 02:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
stigmem before 0.9.0a2 Authentication Bypass via Disabled Auth
Summary
stigmem versions before 0.9.0a2 allow unauthenticated access when authentication is disabled on non-loopback deployments. Attackers can perform read, write, and federation operations with anonymous identity when nodes are exposed outside local development environments.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-25 02:01 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/security/… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/stigmem-befo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| eidetic-labs | stigmem |
Affected:
0 , < 0.9.0a2
(custom)
Unaffected: 0.9.0a2 (custom) |
Date Public
2026-05-19 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-76243",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-25T02:01:28.533475Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T02:01:37.954Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/stigmem-node",
"product": "stigmem",
"vendor": "eidetic-labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.9.0a2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0.9.0a2",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "stigmem versions before 0.9.0a2 allow unauthenticated access when authentication is disabled on non-loopback deployments. Attackers can perform read, write, and federation operations with anonymous identity when nodes are exposed outside local development environments."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.2,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T14:02:20.160Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-fp6w-8wpg-74g5)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eidetic-labs/stigmem/security/advisories/GHSA-fp6w-8wpg-74g5"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: stigmem before 0.9.0a2 Authentication Bypass via Disabled Auth",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/stigmem-before-0a2-authentication-bypass-via-disabled-auth"
}
],
"title": "stigmem before 0.9.0a2 Authentication Bypass via Disabled Auth",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-76243",
"datePublished": "2026-08-19T14:02:20.160Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-19T11:38:33.225Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T02:01:37.954Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-73644 (GCVE-0-2026-73644)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-13 17:52 – Updated: 2026-08-18 01:30
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
OpenDJ: Authorization bypass in SASL PLAIN allowing a `proxied-auth` holder to impersonate any resolvable non-root user without an ACI proxy grant
Summary
OpenDJ is an LDAPv3 compliant directory service. Prior to 5.1.2, the SASL PLAIN authorization identity path in opendj-server-legacy/src/main/java/org/opends/server/extensions/PlainSASLMechanismHandler.java checked the PROXIED_AUTH privilege but did not evaluate the mayProxy proxy ACI scope when an authzid resolved to a different user. Both dn: and u: or bare authzid forms could therefore let an authenticated account holding PROXIED_AUTH assume any resolvable non-root identity outside the identities permitted by its proxy ACI. The fix returns INVALID_CREDENTIALS (49) before password verification when the target authorization identity is not permitted. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.2.
Severity
9.6 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-18 01:29 UTC
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/se… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/co… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/re… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenIdentityPlatform | OpenDJ |
Affected:
< 5.1.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73644",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-18T01:29:18.144094Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T01:30:06.653Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OpenDJ",
"vendor": "OpenIdentityPlatform",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.1.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenDJ is an LDAPv3 compliant directory service. Prior to 5.1.2, the SASL PLAIN authorization identity path in opendj-server-legacy/src/main/java/org/opends/server/extensions/PlainSASLMechanismHandler.java checked the PROXIED_AUTH privilege but did not evaluate the mayProxy proxy ACI scope when an authzid resolved to a different user. Both dn: and u: or bare authzid forms could therefore let an authenticated account holding PROXIED_AUTH assume any resolvable non-root identity outside the identities permitted by its proxy ACI. The fix returns INVALID_CREDENTIALS (49) before password verification when the target authorization identity is not permitted. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.6,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T17:52:48.641Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/security/advisories/GHSA-p279-2cqp-84jg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/security/advisories/GHSA-p279-2cqp-84jg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/commit/5c326850f1ab945cfca7ac9c5aaf77d1052c6bed",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/commit/5c326850f1ab945cfca7ac9c5aaf77d1052c6bed"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/releases/tag/5.1.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenDJ/releases/tag/5.1.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-p279-2cqp-84jg",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenDJ: Authorization bypass in SASL PLAIN allowing a `proxied-auth` holder to impersonate any resolvable non-root user without an ACI proxy grant"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73644",
"datePublished": "2026-08-13T17:52:48.641Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-13T14:04:09.603Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T01:30:06.653Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-73421 (GCVE-0-2026-73421)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-13 22:04 – Updated: 2026-08-18 01:45
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
NextAuth.js: Configuration errors can cause existence-based auth checks to fail open (auth object populated with an error)
Summary
NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. From next-auth 5.0.0-beta.0 until 5.0.0-beta.32, applications that gate access by checking only for the existence of the auth object returned by the auth() wrapper can fail open when Auth.js has a server configuration error. In middleware, Route Handlers, React Server Components, and other auth() entry points, a non-OK session response is parsed into a truthy error object instead of null, so checks such as !!auth and if (req.auth) evaluate to true for unauthenticated requests. A provider missing both the issuer and authorization endpoint triggers InvalidEndpoints, and an unset AUTH_SECRET or another server configuration error can produce the same behavior. There is no impact while configuration is valid, but after a deployment becomes misconfigured, routes protected only by session existence silently grant access to every visitor. This issue is fixed in next-auth 5.0.0-beta.32.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-18 01:45 UTC
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/security/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/d0… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| nextauthjs | next-auth |
Affected:
>= 5.0.0-beta.4, < 5.0.0-beta.32
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73421",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-18T01:45:29.266864Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T01:45:41.913Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "next-auth",
"vendor": "nextauthjs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 5.0.0-beta.4, \u003c 5.0.0-beta.32"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. From next-auth 5.0.0-beta.0 until 5.0.0-beta.32, applications that gate access by checking only for the existence of the auth object returned by the auth() wrapper can fail open when Auth.js has a server configuration error. In middleware, Route Handlers, React Server Components, and other auth() entry points, a non-OK session response is parsed into a truthy error object instead of null, so checks such as !!auth and if (req.auth) evaluate to true for unauthenticated requests. A provider missing both the issuer and authorization endpoint triggers InvalidEndpoints, and an unset AUTH_SECRET or another server configuration error can produce the same behavior. There is no impact while configuration is valid, but after a deployment becomes misconfigured, routes protected only by session existence silently grant access to every visitor. This issue is fixed in next-auth 5.0.0-beta.32."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-636",
"description": "CWE-636: Not Failing Securely (\u0027Failing Open\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T22:04:36.985Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-8fpg-xm3f-6cx3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-8fpg-xm3f-6cx3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/d008b9b764bf4b322a87e1822d1dda7789258d8f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/d008b9b764bf4b322a87e1822d1dda7789258d8f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/next-auth@5.0.0-beta.32",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/next-auth@5.0.0-beta.32"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8fpg-xm3f-6cx3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "NextAuth.js: Configuration errors can cause existence-based auth checks to fail open (auth object populated with an error)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73421",
"datePublished": "2026-08-13T22:04:36.985Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-12T14:32:11.795Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-18T01:45:41.913Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-72907 (GCVE-0-2026-72907)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-10 20:49 – Updated: 2026-08-13 15:50
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ERPNext: Broken Access Control on certain endpoint
Summary
ERPNext is a free and open source Enterprise Resource Planning tool. Prior to 15.111.0 and 16.22.0, the add_ac function in erpnext/accounts/utils.py accepts the ignore_permissions argument without enforcing Account create permission, allowing an authenticated limited user to create unauthorized accounting master records and affect financial data integrity and audit trails. This issue is fixed in versions 15.111.0 and 16.22.0.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 15:49 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
7 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/security/adviso… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/pull/55665 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/2d0e3fd9… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/37d2adc7… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/c0cf9aa1… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v1… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v16.22.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72907",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T15:49:56.650632Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T15:50:03.387Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "erpnext",
"vendor": "frappe",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 15.111.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 16.0.0, \u003c 16.22.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ERPNext is a free and open source Enterprise Resource Planning tool. Prior to 15.111.0 and 16.22.0, the add_ac function in erpnext/accounts/utils.py accepts the ignore_permissions argument without enforcing Account create permission, allowing an authenticated limited user to create unauthorized accounting master records and affect financial data integrity and audit trails. This issue is fixed in versions 15.111.0 and 16.22.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-10T20:49:26.987Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/security/advisories/GHSA-94v6-784v-24q5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/security/advisories/GHSA-94v6-784v-24q5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/pull/55665",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/pull/55665"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/2d0e3fd9af521e407be35fd09e9427176609513f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/2d0e3fd9af521e407be35fd09e9427176609513f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/37d2adc74ba91f388194b3bbe07368c40573a9b2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/37d2adc74ba91f388194b3bbe07368c40573a9b2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/c0cf9aa1a7f95ee22b99ea1ca2a2cb09b314e67f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/commit/c0cf9aa1a7f95ee22b99ea1ca2a2cb09b314e67f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v15.111.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v15.111.0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v16.22.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/frappe/erpnext/releases/tag/v16.22.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-94v6-784v-24q5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ERPNext: Broken Access Control on certain endpoint"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72907",
"datePublished": "2026-08-10T20:49:26.987Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T17:57:26.143Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T15:50:03.387Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-72786 (GCVE-0-2026-72786)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 19:07 – Updated: 2026-08-14 16:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.8 Authentication Bypass via Password Reset
Summary
Craft CMS versions before 5.10.8 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the elements/save action that allows authenticated users to change passwords without verification. Attackers with edit users permission can reset any user's password including administrators by exploiting the unprotected newPassword field in the User element save flow.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-13 12:31 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisori… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/craft-cms-rc… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-07-25 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72786",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-13T12:31:30.991398Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T12:35:42.214Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "cms",
"vendor": "craftcms",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.10.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0-RC1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.8",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:craftcms:craft_cms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "mHe4am"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Craft CMS versions before 5.10.8 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the elements/save action that allows authenticated users to change passwords without verification. Attackers with edit users permission can reset any user\u0027s password including administrators by exploiting the unprotected newPassword field in the User element save flow."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T16:51:57.728Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-p8x7-9vfw-p7vc)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-p8x7-9vfw-p7vc"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.8 Authentication Bypass via Password Reset",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/craft-cms-rc1-before-authentication-bypass-via-password-reset"
}
],
"title": "Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.8 Authentication Bypass via Password Reset",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72786",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T19:07:35.873Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T15:10:15.963Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-14T16:51:57.728Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-70665 (GCVE-0-2026-70665)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-25 22:09 – Updated: 2026-08-27 14:34
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Doorkeeper OpenID Connect: DCR endpoint persists unvalidated client-supplied scopes
Summary
Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.
Severity
4.2 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-27 13:52 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-open… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-open… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| doorkeeper-gem | doorkeeper-openid_connect |
Affected:
< 1.10.4
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-70665",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-27T13:52:58.639766Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T14:34:50.455Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "doorkeeper-openid_connect",
"vendor": "doorkeeper-gem",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.10.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server\u0027s configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper\u0027s ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T22:09:53.197Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/security/advisories/GHSA-8r7r-wh7x-27ff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/security/advisories/GHSA-8r7r-wh7x-27ff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/commit/24c3cb1729b69f48649a6f4491dcae69f805000d",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/commit/24c3cb1729b69f48649a6f4491dcae69f805000d"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8r7r-wh7x-27ff",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Doorkeeper OpenID Connect: DCR endpoint persists unvalidated client-supplied scopes"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-70665",
"datePublished": "2026-08-25T22:09:53.197Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-04T21:48:08.613Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T14:34:50.455Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-70472 (GCVE-0-2026-70472)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-04 17:46 – Updated: 2026-08-05 15:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Flowise: Cross-workspace credential IDOR in openai-assistants-vector-store
Summary
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, Flowise openai-assistants-vector-store endpoints accept a client-controlled credential parameter and load credentials by id without checking whether that credential belongs to the caller workspace. Route permissions assistants:* only check feature access. The controller passes req.query.credential straight to the service, and the service uses findOneBy({ id: credentialId }), decrypts the credential, and calls OpenAI APIs without a workspaceId check. If an attacker knows another workspace credentialId, the attacker can use that workspace OpenAI key, read, modify, or delete victim vector stores and files, cause billing impact on the victim OpenAI account, and violate multi-tenant boundaries. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-05 15:00 UTC
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/6170 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/d8148… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/releases/tag… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-70472",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-05T15:00:56.335227Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T15:01:55.377Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-chm3-vqcf-52rx"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Flowise",
"vendor": "FlowiseAI",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.1.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Flowise is a drag \u0026 drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, Flowise openai-assistants-vector-store endpoints accept a client-controlled credential parameter and load credentials by id without checking whether that credential belongs to the caller workspace. Route permissions assistants:* only check feature access. The controller passes req.query.credential straight to the service, and the service uses findOneBy({ id: credentialId }), decrypts the credential, and calls OpenAI APIs without a workspaceId check. If an attacker knows another workspace credentialId, the attacker can use that workspace OpenAI key, read, modify, or delete victim vector stores and files, cause billing impact on the victim OpenAI account, and violate multi-tenant boundaries. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-04T17:46:05.452Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-chm3-vqcf-52rx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-chm3-vqcf-52rx"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/6170",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/pull/6170"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/d81483b70c997ddf981acc9c49fbd9a02fa345cd",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/d81483b70c997ddf981acc9c49fbd9a02fa345cd"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/releases/tag/flowise@3.1.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/releases/tag/flowise@3.1.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-chm3-vqcf-52rx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Flowise: Cross-workspace credential IDOR in openai-assistants-vector-store"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-70472",
"datePublished": "2026-08-04T17:46:05.452Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-04T15:24:41.339Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T15:01:55.377Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-67332 (GCVE-0-2026-67332)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-01 12:22 – Updated: 2026-08-03 18:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass
Summary
@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 fails to bind access-token audience to the authorization grant, allowing clients to request tokens for unrelated resources. Attackers can complete an OAuth flow and obtain access tokens whose audience targets resource servers the authorization never covered, bypassing intended authorization boundaries.
Severity
6.4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-03 18:31 UTC
CWE
- CWE-285 - Improper Authorization
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/securi… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| better-auth | oauth-provider |
Affected:
1.4.8 , < 1.7.0-beta.4
(semver)
Unaffected: 1.7.0-beta.4 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:better-auth:better-auth\/oauth-provider:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:* |
Date Public
2026-05-31 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-67332",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-03T18:31:41.763951Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T18:32:02.559Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/better-auth/oauth-provider",
"product": "oauth-provider",
"vendor": "better-auth",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.7.0-beta.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.4.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.7.0-beta.4",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:better-auth:better-auth\\/oauth-provider:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.7.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.4.8",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "dvanmali"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 fails to bind access-token audience to the authorization grant, allowing clients to request tokens for unrelated resources. Attackers can complete an OAuth flow and obtain access tokens whose audience targets resource servers the authorization never covered, bypassing intended authorization boundaries."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-01T12:22:18.036Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-p2fr-6hmx-4528)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-p2fr-6hmx-4528"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: @better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-oauth-provider-before-beta-4-authorization-bypass"
}
],
"title": "@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-67332",
"datePublished": "2026-08-01T12:22:18.036Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-29T13:07:47.015Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T18:32:02.559Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration
Installation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-1: Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs
In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by an authorization framework. This framework maps Access Control Lists (ACLs) to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application, or can run queries for data that they otherwise not supposed to.
CAPEC-104: Cross Zone Scripting
An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security.
CAPEC-127: Directory Indexing
An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
CAPEC-13: Subverting Environment Variable Values
The adversary directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The adversary's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the adversary.
CAPEC-17: Using Malicious Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an adversary to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an adversary to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
CAPEC-39: Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data Tokens
In circumstances where an application holds important data client-side in tokens (cookies, URLs, data files, and so forth) that data can be manipulated. If client or server-side application components reinterpret that data as authentication tokens or data (such as store item pricing or wallet information) then even opaquely manipulating that data may bear fruit for an Attacker. In this pattern an attacker undermines the assumption that client side tokens have been adequately protected from tampering through use of encryption or obfuscation.
CAPEC-402: Bypassing ATA Password Security
An adversary exploits a weakness in ATA security on a drive to gain access to the information the drive contains without supplying the proper credentials. ATA Security is often employed to protect hard disk information from unauthorized access. The mechanism requires the user to type in a password before the BIOS is allowed access to drive contents. Some implementations of ATA security will accept the ATA command to update the password without the user having authenticated with the BIOS. This occurs because the security mechanism assumes the user has first authenticated via the BIOS prior to sending commands to the drive. Various methods exist for exploiting this flaw, the most common being installing the ATA protected drive into a system lacking ATA security features (a.k.a. hot swapping). Once the drive is installed into the new system the BIOS can be used to reset the drive password.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-5: Blue Boxing
This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
{'xhtml:b': 'This attack pattern is included in CAPEC for historical purposes.'}
CAPEC-51: Poison Web Service Registry
SOA and Web Services often use a registry to perform look up, get schema information, and metadata about services. A poisoned registry can redirect (think phishing for servers) the service requester to a malicious service provider, provide incorrect information in schema or metadata, and delete information about service provider interfaces.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-647: Collect Data from Registries
An adversary exploits a weakness in authorization to gather system-specific data and sensitive information within a registry (e.g., Windows Registry, Mac plist). These contain information about the system configuration, software, operating system, and security. The adversary can leverage information gathered in order to carry out further attacks.
CAPEC-668: Key Negotiation of Bluetooth Attack (KNOB)
An adversary can exploit a flaw in Bluetooth key negotiation allowing them to decrypt information sent between two devices communicating via Bluetooth. The adversary uses an Adversary in the Middle setup to modify packets sent between the two devices during the authentication process, specifically the entropy bits. Knowledge of the number of entropy bits will allow the attacker to easily decrypt information passing over the line of communication.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.
CAPEC-87: Forceful Browsing
An attacker employs forceful browsing (direct URL entry) to access portions of a website that are otherwise unreachable. Usually, a front controller or similar design pattern is employed to protect access to portions of a web application. Forceful browsing enables an attacker to access information, perform privileged operations and otherwise reach sections of the web application that have been improperly protected.