ubuntu-cve-2025-52566
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2025-06-24 04:15
Modified
2026-05-20 15:22
Summary
Details
llama.cpp is an inference of several LLM models in C/C++. Prior to version b5721, there is a signed vs. unsigned integer overflow in llama.cpp's tokenizer implementation (llama_vocab::tokenize) (src/llama-vocab.cpp:3036) resulting in unintended behavior in tokens copying size comparison. Allowing heap-overflowing llama.cpp inferencing engine with carefully manipulated text input during tokenization process. This issue has been patched in version b5721.
Severity
8.6 (High)
8.8 (High)
N/A (UNKNOWN)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp",
"binary_version": "5882+dfsg-2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:25.10",
"name": "llama.cpp",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/llama.cpp@5882+dfsg-2?arch=source\u0026distro=questing"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5318+dfsg-1",
"5318+dfsg-2",
"5713+dfsg-1",
"5760+dfsg-1",
"5760+dfsg-3",
"5760+dfsg-4",
"5882+dfsg-2"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libllama0",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp-examples",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp-tests",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp-tools",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "llama.cpp-tools-extra",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
},
{
"binary_name": "python3-gguf",
"binary_version": "8681+dfsg-1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS",
"name": "llama.cpp",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/llama.cpp@8681+dfsg-1?arch=source\u0026distro=resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5882+dfsg-2",
"8064+dfsg-1ubuntu1",
"8681+dfsg-1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "llama.cpp is an inference of several LLM models in C/C++. Prior to version b5721, there is a signed vs. unsigned integer overflow in llama.cpp\u0027s tokenizer implementation (llama_vocab::tokenize) (src/llama-vocab.cpp:3036) resulting in unintended behavior in tokens copying size comparison. Allowing heap-overflowing llama.cpp inferencing engine with carefully manipulated text input during tokenization process. This issue has been patched in version b5721.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2025-52566",
"modified": "2026-05-20T15:22:54Z",
"published": "2025-06-24T04:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-52566"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52566"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/security/advisories/GHSA-7rxv-5jhh-j6xx"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/dd6e6d0b6a4bbe3ebfc931d1eb14db2f2b1d70af"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/commit/dd6e6d0b6a4bbe3ebfc931d1eb14db2f2b1d70af"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-52566"
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…