PYSEC-2026-330
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-06-29 11:50 - Updated: 2026-06-29 12:05
VLAI
Details
Impact
EPyT-Flow’s REST API parses attacker-controlled JSON request bodies using a custom deserializer (my_load_from_json) that supports a type field. When type is present, the deserializer dynamically imports an attacker-specified module/class and instantiates it with attacker-supplied arguments. This allows invoking dangerous classes such as subprocess.Popen, which can lead to OS command execution during JSON parsing. This also affects the loading of JSON files.
Patches
EPyT-Flow has been patched in 0.16.1 -- affects all versions <= 0.16.0
Workarounds
Do not load any JSON from untrusted sources and do not expose the REST API.
### Credits EPyT-Flow thanks Jarrett Chan (@syphonetic) for detecting and reporting the bug.
Severity
10.0 (Critical)
Impacted products
| Name | purl | epyt-flow |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "epyt-flow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.16.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.0",
"0.1.1",
"0.10.0",
"0.11.0",
"0.12.0",
"0.13.0",
"0.13.1",
"0.14.0",
"0.14.1",
"0.14.2",
"0.15.0",
"0.15.0b1",
"0.16.0",
"0.2.0",
"0.3.0",
"0.4.0",
"0.5.0",
"0.6.0",
"0.7.0",
"0.7.1",
"0.7.2",
"0.7.3",
"0.8.0",
"0.8.1",
"0.9.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25632",
"GHSA-74vm-8frp-7w68"
],
"details": "### Impact\nEPyT-Flow\u2019s REST API parses attacker-controlled JSON request bodies using a custom deserializer (my_load_from_json) that supports a __type__ field. When __type__ is present, the deserializer dynamically imports an attacker-specified module/class and instantiates it with attacker-supplied arguments. This allows invoking dangerous classes such as subprocess.Popen, which can lead to OS command execution during JSON parsing. This also affects the loading of JSON files.\n\n### Patches\nEPyT-Flow has been patched in 0.16.1 -- affects all versions \u003c= 0.16.0\n\n### Workarounds\n Do not load any JSON from untrusted sources and do not expose the REST API.\n\n ### Credits\nEPyT-Flow thanks Jarrett Chan (@syphonetic) for detecting and reporting the bug.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-330",
"modified": "2026-06-29T12:05:27.220480Z",
"published": "2026-06-29T11:50:50.959788Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WaterFutures/EPyT-Flow/security/advisories/GHSA-74vm-8frp-7w68"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25632"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WaterFutures/EPyT-Flow/commit/3fff9151494c7dbc72073830b734f0a7e550e385"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/WaterFutures/EPyT-Flow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WaterFutures/EPyT-Flow/releases/tag/v0.16.1"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/epyt-flow"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-74vm-8frp-7w68"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "EPyT-Flow vulnerable to unsafe JSON deserialization (__type__)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…