pysec-2019-149
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2019-01-23 17:29
Modified
2021-07-05 00:01
Details
In Apache Airflow 1.8.2 and earlier, an experimental Airflow feature displayed authenticated cookies, as well as passwords to databases used by Airflow. An attacker who has limited access to airflow, whether it be via XSS or by leaving a machine unlocked can exfiltrate all credentials from the system.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
apache-airflow | pkg:pypi/apache-airflow |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "apache-airflow", purl: "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "1.9.0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "1.8.1", "1.8.2", "1.8.2rc1", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-17836", "GHSA-9gqg-3fxr-9hv7", ], details: "In Apache Airflow 1.8.2 and earlier, an experimental Airflow feature displayed authenticated cookies, as well as passwords to databases used by Airflow. An attacker who has limited access to airflow, whether it be via XSS or by leaving a machine unlocked can exfiltrate all credentials from the system.", id: "PYSEC-2019-149", modified: "2021-07-05T00:01:17.060541Z", published: "2019-01-23T17:29:00Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ade4d54ebf614f68dc81a08891755e60ea58ba88e0209233eeea5f57@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9gqg-3fxr-9hv7", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.