OESA-2026-3047 (CVE-2025-55159)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-07-19 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteA guided tour and greeter for GNOME.Tour uses by default the logo of the distribution based on the info from /etc/os-release. The application comes with a feature to replace the logo with a welcome video shipped by the distribution.
Security Fix(es):
slab is a pre-allocated storage for a uniform data type. In version 0.4.10, the get_disjoint_mut method incorrectly checked if indices were within the slab's capacity instead of its length, allowing access to uninitialized memory. This could lead to undefined behavior or potential crashes. This has been fixed in slab 0.4.11. A workaround for this issue involves to avoid using get_disjoint_mut with indices that might be beyond the slab's actual length.(CVE-2025-55159)
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"gnome-tour-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"gnome-tour-debuginfo-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"gnome-tour-debugsource-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"gnome-tour-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"gnome-tour-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"gnome-tour-debuginfo-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"gnome-tour-debugsource-44.0-3.oe2403sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "gnome-tour",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/gnome-tour\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "44.0-3.oe2403sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Medium"
},
"details": "A guided tour and greeter for GNOME.Tour uses by default the logo of the distribution based on the info from `/etc/os-release`. The application comes with a feature to replace the logo with a welcome video shipped by the distribution.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nslab is a pre-allocated storage for a uniform data type. In version 0.4.10, the get_disjoint_mut method incorrectly checked if indices were within the slab\u0026apos;s capacity instead of its length, allowing access to uninitialized memory. This could lead to undefined behavior or potential crashes. This has been fixed in slab 0.4.11. A workaround for this issue involves to avoid using get_disjoint_mut with indices that might be beyond the slab\u0026apos;s actual length.(CVE-2025-55159)",
"id": "OESA-2026-3047",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:56Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T11:11:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3047"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55159"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "gnome-tour security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-55159"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.