GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2024-26757

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2024-02-20 06:02
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: Don't ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery() Usually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won't register new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is read-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will unregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid follow this behavior hence there is no problem. After commit f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread"), following hang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh: 1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block: rs_update_sbs ro = mddev->ro mddev->ro = 0 -> set array read-write md_update_sb 2) register new sync thread concurrently. 3) dm-raid set array back to read-only: rs_update_sbs mddev->ro = ro 4) stop the array: raid_dtr md_stop stop_sync_thread set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread); wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) 5) sync thread done: md_do_sync set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery); md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread); 6) daemon thread can't unregister sync thread: md_check_recovery if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) && !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery)) return; -> -> MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can't be cleared, hence step 4 hang; The root cause is that dm-raid manipulate 'mddev->ro' by itself, however, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the array read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I can refacter the handler of 'mddev->ro' in dm-raid, hence let's fix the problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression.
Aliases

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-26757"
      ],
      "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd: Don\u0027t ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()\n\nUsually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won\u0027t\nregister new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is\nread-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will\nunregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid\nfollow this behavior hence there is no problem.\n\nAfter commit f52f5c71f3d4 (\"md: fix stopping sync thread\"), following\nhang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh:\n\n1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block:\nrs_update_sbs\n ro = mddev-\u003ero\n mddev-\u003ero = 0\n  -\u003e set array read-write\n md_update_sb\n\n2) register new sync thread concurrently.\n\n3) dm-raid set array back to read-only:\nrs_update_sbs\n mddev-\u003ero = ro\n\n4) stop the array:\nraid_dtr\n md_stop\n  stop_sync_thread\n    set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n    md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev-\u003esync_thread);\n    wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n\n5) sync thread done:\n md_do_sync\n set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n md_wakeup_thread(mddev-\u003ethread);\n\n6) daemon thread can\u0027t unregister sync thread:\n md_check_recovery\n  if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) \u0026\u0026\n      !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n   return;\n  -\u003e -\u003e MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can\u0027t be cleared, hence step 4 hang;\n\nThe root cause is that dm-raid manipulate \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 by itself,\nhowever, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the\narray read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I\ncan refacter the handler of \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 in dm-raid, hence let\u0027s fix\nthe problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression.",
      "id": "GSD-2024-26757",
      "modified": "2024-02-20T06:02:29.233475Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-26757",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Linux",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "ecbfb9f118bc",
                          "version_value": "2ea169c5a0b1"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "not down converted",
                          "x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
                            "defaultStatus": "affected",
                            "versions": [
                              {
                                "status": "affected",
                                "version": "4.8"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThan": "4.8",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "0",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "6.7.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.7.7",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.8",
                                "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
                              }
                            ]
                          }
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Linux"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd: Don\u0027t ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()\n\nUsually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won\u0027t\nregister new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is\nread-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will\nunregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid\nfollow this behavior hence there is no problem.\n\nAfter commit f52f5c71f3d4 (\"md: fix stopping sync thread\"), following\nhang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh:\n\n1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block:\nrs_update_sbs\n ro = mddev-\u003ero\n mddev-\u003ero = 0\n  -\u003e set array read-write\n md_update_sb\n\n2) register new sync thread concurrently.\n\n3) dm-raid set array back to read-only:\nrs_update_sbs\n mddev-\u003ero = ro\n\n4) stop the array:\nraid_dtr\n md_stop\n  stop_sync_thread\n    set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n    md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev-\u003esync_thread);\n    wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n\n5) sync thread done:\n md_do_sync\n set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n md_wakeup_thread(mddev-\u003ethread);\n\n6) daemon thread can\u0027t unregister sync thread:\n md_check_recovery\n  if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) \u0026\u0026\n      !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n   return;\n  -\u003e -\u003e MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can\u0027t be cleared, hence step 4 hang;\n\nThe root cause is that dm-raid manipulate \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 by itself,\nhowever, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the\narray read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I\ncan refacter the handler of \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 in dm-raid, hence let\u0027s fix\nthe problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression."
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-5f0117140d9a"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ea169c5a0b1134d573d07fc27a16f327ad0e7d3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ea169c5a0b1134d573d07fc27a16f327ad0e7d3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55a48ad2db64737f7ffc0407634218cc6e4c513b",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55a48ad2db64737f7ffc0407634218cc6e4c513b"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd: Don\u0027t ignore read-only array in md_check_recovery()\n\nUsually if the array is not read-write, md_check_recovery() won\u0027t\nregister new sync_thread in the first place. And if the array is\nread-write and sync_thread is registered, md_set_readonly() will\nunregister sync_thread before setting the array read-only. md/raid\nfollow this behavior hence there is no problem.\n\nAfter commit f52f5c71f3d4 (\"md: fix stopping sync thread\"), following\nhang can be triggered by test shell/integrity-caching.sh:\n\n1) array is read-only. dm-raid update super block:\nrs_update_sbs\n ro = mddev-\u003ero\n mddev-\u003ero = 0\n  -\u003e set array read-write\n md_update_sb\n\n2) register new sync thread concurrently.\n\n3) dm-raid set array back to read-only:\nrs_update_sbs\n mddev-\u003ero = ro\n\n4) stop the array:\nraid_dtr\n md_stop\n  stop_sync_thread\n    set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n    md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev-\u003esync_thread);\n    wait_event(..., !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n\n5) sync thread done:\n md_do_sync\n set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery);\n md_wakeup_thread(mddev-\u003ethread);\n\n6) daemon thread can\u0027t unregister sync thread:\n md_check_recovery\n  if (!md_is_rdwr(mddev) \u0026\u0026\n      !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, \u0026mddev-\u003erecovery))\n   return;\n  -\u003e -\u003e MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING can\u0027t be cleared, hence step 4 hang;\n\nThe root cause is that dm-raid manipulate \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 by itself,\nhowever, dm-raid really should stop sync thread before setting the\narray read-only. Unfortunately, I need to read more code before I\ncan refacter the handler of \u0027mddev-\u003ero\u0027 in dm-raid, hence let\u0027s fix\nthe problem the easy way for now to prevent dm-raid regression."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-26757",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-03T17:24:18.150",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-03T17:15:52.207",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ea169c5a0b1134d573d07fc27a16f327ad0e7d3"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55a48ad2db64737f7ffc0407634218cc6e4c513b"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…