gsd-2017-16012
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2017-16012", "description": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.", "id": "GSD-2017-16012", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16012.html", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0983", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0501" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-16012" ], "details": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.", "id": "GSD-2017-16012", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:01.152404Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2017-16012", "STATE": "REJECT" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage." } ] } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.