CVE-2017-16012 (GCVE-0-2017-16012)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2018-06-04 19:00 – Updated: 2018-06-26 16:57
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-06-26T16:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-16012",
"datePublished": "2018-06-04T19:00:00.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2018-06-26T16:57:01.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2017-10-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2018-06-26T16:57:01.000Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-16012",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:40:26.887",
"published": "2018-06-04T19:29:00.833",
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9251. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9251. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9251 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2017-16012",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:40:26.887",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2018-06-04T19:29:00.833",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T21:55:51+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2017-16012",
"id": "CVE-2017-16012",
"initial_release_date": "2017-03-21T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "2",
"product_status:known_affected": "16",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "js-jquery: XSS in responses from cross-origin ajax requests",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2017/cve-2017-16012.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2025-07-09T00:10:30Z",
"cve": "CVE-2017-16012",
"id": "CVE-2017-16012",
"initial_release_date": "2023-02-15T04:37:41Z",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2017-16012",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2017-16012.json",
"version": "6"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…