gsd-2017-15090
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2017-15090", "description": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.", "id": "GSD-2017-15090", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15090.html", "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2017-15090" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-15090" ], "details": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.", "id": "GSD-2017-15090", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:58.819604Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-11-27T00:00:00", "ID": "CVE-2017-15090", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "PowerDNS", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "PowerDNS" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-347" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html" }, { "name": "101982", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndIncluding": "4.0.6", "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2017-15090" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-347" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html" }, { "name": "101982", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.9, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:24Z", "publishedDate": "2018-01-23T15:29Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.