CVE-2017-15090
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2018-01-23 15:00
Modified
2024-09-16 18:38
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982 | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry | |
secalert@redhat.com | https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html | Patch, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982 | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html | Patch, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T19:50:14.915Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html" }, { "name": "101982", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "PowerDNS", "vendor": "PowerDNS", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2017-11-27T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-347", "description": "CWE-347", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2018-01-24T10:57:01", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html" }, { "name": "101982", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-11-27T00:00:00", "ID": "CVE-2017-15090", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "PowerDNS", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "PowerDNS" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-347" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html" }, { "name": "101982", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2017-15090", "datePublished": "2018-01-23T15:00:00Z", "dateReserved": "2017-10-08T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T18:38:21.212Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-15090\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2018-01-23T15:29:00.213\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T03:14:03.050\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An issue has been found in the DNSSEC validation component of PowerDNS Recursor from 4.0.0 and up to and including 4.0.6, where the signatures might have been accepted as valid even if the signed data was not in bailiwick of the DNSKEY used to sign it. This allows an attacker in position of man-in-the-middle to alter the content of records by issuing a valid signature for the crafted records.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha descubierto un problema en el componente de validaci\u00f3n DNSSEC de PowerDNS Recursor, desde la versi\u00f3n 4.0.0 hasta la versi\u00f3n 4.0.6, tambi\u00e9n incluida, en el que las firmas podr\u00edan haber sido aceptadas como v\u00e1lidas incluso aunque los datos firmados no estuvieran en el territorio del DNSKEY empleado para firmarlo. Esto permite que un atacante en posici\u00f3n Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) altere el contenido de los registros enviando una firma v\u00e1lida para los registros manipulados.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:recursor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.0.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"4.0.6\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"94094CC8-C228-40FF-BA81-FD93082D99A2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101982\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2017-03.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.