GHSA-XM5M-WGH2-RRG3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 01:01 – Updated: 2026-04-24 20:43
VLAI
Summary
Sigstore Timestamp Authority has Improper Certificate Validation in verifier
Details

Authorization bypass via certificate bag manipulation in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier

An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier (timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification): VerifyTimestampResponse function correctly verifies the certificate chain but when the TSA specific constraints are verified in VerifyLeafCert, the first non-CA certificate from the PKCS#7 certificate bag is used instead of the leaf certificate from the certificate chain. An attacker can exploit this by prepending a forged certificate to the certificate bag while the message is signed with an authorized key. The library validates the signature using the one certificate but performs authorization checks on the another, allowing an attacker to bypass some authorization controls.

This vulnerability does not apply to timestamp-authority service, only to users of timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification package.

This vulnerability does not apply to sigstore-go even though it is a user of timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification: Providing TSACertificate option to VerifyTimestampResponse fully mitigates the issue.

Patches

The issue will be fixed in timestamp-authority 2.0.6

Workarounds

Users of VerifyTimestampResponse can use the TSACertificate option to specify the exact certificate they expect to be used: this fully mitigates the issue.

References

This issue was found after reading CVE-2026-33753 / GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj (originally reported by @Jaynornj and @Pr00fOf3xpl0it)

Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.0.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-39984"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T01:01:59Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-15T04:17:40Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Authorization bypass via certificate bag manipulation in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier\n\nAn authorization bypass vulnerability exists in sigstore/timestamp-authority verifier (timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification): `VerifyTimestampResponse` function correctly verifies the certificate chain but when the TSA specific constraints are verified in `VerifyLeafCert`, the first non-CA certificate from the PKCS#7 certificate bag is used instead of the leaf certificate from the certificate chain. An attacker can exploit this by prepending a forged certificate to the certificate bag while the message is signed with an authorized key. The library validates the signature using the one certificate but performs authorization checks on the another, allowing an attacker to bypass some authorization controls. \n\nThis vulnerability does **not** apply to timestamp-authority service, only to users of `timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification` package.\n\nThis vulnerability does **not** apply to sigstore-go even though it is a user of `timestamp-authority/v2/pkg/verification`: Providing `TSACertificate` option to  `VerifyTimestampResponse` fully mitigates the issue.\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThe issue will be fixed in timestamp-authority 2.0.6\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers of `VerifyTimestampResponse` can use the `TSACertificate` option to specify the exact certificate they expect to be used: this fully mitigates the issue.\n\n### References\n\nThis issue was found after reading CVE-2026-33753 / GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj (originally reported by @Jaynornj and @Pr00fOf3xpl0it)",
  "id": "GHSA-xm5m-wgh2-rrg3",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T20:43:09Z",
  "published": "2026-04-14T01:01:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/security/advisories/GHSA-xm5m-wgh2-rrg3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39984"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/releases/tag/v2.0.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Sigstore Timestamp Authority has Improper Certificate Validation in verifier"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.