GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-Q4PP-63R6-WX5Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-23 15:31 – Updated: 2025-09-23 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to do sanity check on curseg->alloc_type

As Wenqing Liu reported in bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215657

  • Overview UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/f2fs/segment.c:3460:2 when mount and operate a corrupted image

  • Reproduce tested on kernel 5.17-rc4, 5.17-rc6

  • mkdir test_crash

  • cd test_crash
  • unzip tmp2.zip
  • mkdir mnt
  • ./single_test.sh f2fs 2

  • Kernel dump [ 46.434454] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 131072 [ 46.529839] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 7548c2d9 [ 46.738319] ================================================================================ [ 46.738412] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/f2fs/segment.c:3460:2 [ 46.738475] index 231 is out of range for type 'unsigned int [2]' [ 46.738539] CPU: 2 PID: 939 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6 #1 [ 46.738547] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 [ 46.738551] Call Trace: [ 46.738556] [ 46.738563] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c [ 46.738581] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50 [ 46.738592] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x68/0x80 [ 46.738604] f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xdff/0xe60 [f2fs] [ 46.738819] do_write_page+0xef/0x210 [f2fs] [ 46.738934] f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x3f/0x80 [f2fs] [ 46.739038] __write_node_page+0x2b7/0x920 [f2fs] [ 46.739162] f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x943/0xb00 [f2fs] [ 46.739293] f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x7bb/0x1030 [f2fs] [ 46.739405] kill_f2fs_super+0x125/0x150 [f2fs] [ 46.739507] deactivate_locked_super+0x60/0xc0 [ 46.739517] deactivate_super+0x70/0xb0 [ 46.739524] cleanup_mnt+0x11a/0x200 [ 46.739532] __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20 [ 46.739538] task_work_run+0x67/0xa0 [ 46.739547] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x18c/0x1a0 [ 46.739559] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 46.739568] do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 [ 46.739584] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

The root cause is we missed to do sanity check on curseg->alloc_type, result in out-of-bound accessing on sbi->block_count[] array, fix it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49170"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-129"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:00:54Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to do sanity check on curseg-\u003ealloc_type\n\nAs Wenqing Liu reported in bugzilla:\n\nhttps://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215657\n\n- Overview\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/f2fs/segment.c:3460:2 when mount and operate a corrupted image\n\n- Reproduce\ntested on kernel 5.17-rc4, 5.17-rc6\n\n1. mkdir test_crash\n2. cd test_crash\n3. unzip tmp2.zip\n4. mkdir mnt\n5. ./single_test.sh f2fs 2\n\n- Kernel dump\n[   46.434454] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 131072\n[   46.529839] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 7548c2d9\n[   46.738319] ================================================================================\n[   46.738412] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/f2fs/segment.c:3460:2\n[   46.738475] index 231 is out of range for type \u0027unsigned int [2]\u0027\n[   46.738539] CPU: 2 PID: 939 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6 #1\n[   46.738547] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014\n[   46.738551] Call Trace:\n[   46.738556]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[   46.738563]  dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x5c\n[   46.738581]  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50\n[   46.738592]  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x68/0x80\n[   46.738604]  f2fs_allocate_data_block+0xdff/0xe60 [f2fs]\n[   46.738819]  do_write_page+0xef/0x210 [f2fs]\n[   46.738934]  f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x3f/0x80 [f2fs]\n[   46.739038]  __write_node_page+0x2b7/0x920 [f2fs]\n[   46.739162]  f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x943/0xb00 [f2fs]\n[   46.739293]  f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x7bb/0x1030 [f2fs]\n[   46.739405]  kill_f2fs_super+0x125/0x150 [f2fs]\n[   46.739507]  deactivate_locked_super+0x60/0xc0\n[   46.739517]  deactivate_super+0x70/0xb0\n[   46.739524]  cleanup_mnt+0x11a/0x200\n[   46.739532]  __cleanup_mnt+0x16/0x20\n[   46.739538]  task_work_run+0x67/0xa0\n[   46.739547]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x18c/0x1a0\n[   46.739559]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x40\n[   46.739568]  do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0\n[   46.739584]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nThe root cause is we missed to do sanity check on curseg-\u003ealloc_type,\nresult in out-of-bound accessing on sbi-\u003eblock_count[] array, fix it.",
  "id": "GHSA-q4pp-63r6-wx5q",
  "modified": "2025-09-23T15:31:07Z",
  "published": "2025-09-23T15:31:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49170"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0748a0f7dcb9d9dddc80302d73ebcecef6782ef0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/498b7088db71f9707359448cd6800bbb1882f4c3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c12765e3f129b144421c80d3383df885f85ee290"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f41ee8b91c00770d718be2ff4852a80017ae9ab3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f68caedf264a95c0b02dfd0d9f92ac2637d5848a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…