GHSA-PWPJ-P52H-Q484

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-23 23:12 – Updated: 2026-06-23 23:12
VLAI
Summary
Snipe-IT API Vulnerable to Cross-Tenant Accessory Injection
Details

Impact

A cross-tenant data injection vulnerability was identified in the Snipe-IT Accessories API when Full Multiple Companies Support (FMCS) is enabled. A low-privileged authenticated user belonging to one company can create an accessory record under another company by supplying a foreign company_id value in the API request body.

The issue occurs because the API create path mass-assigns request parameters directly to the Accessory model, and the Accessory model allows company_id to be mass assigned. Unlike the web controller, which uses Company::getIdForCurrentUser() to enforce the authenticated user’s company context, the API controller does not apply equivalent tenant enforcement during accessory creation.

As a result, a Company A user can inject persistent accessory records into Company B. The injected records are then visible to Company B users as legitimate Company B inventory records. This breaks the integrity of company-scoped inventory data and represents a tenant isolation failure in the accessory creation flow.

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/dc8cbf4786bb38b260b4ae1723ec9e7f81d82fe5

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.6.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "snipe/snipe-it"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.6.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54329"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-74"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-23T23:12:04Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nA cross-tenant data injection vulnerability was identified in the Snipe-IT Accessories API when Full Multiple Companies Support (FMCS) is enabled. A low-privileged authenticated user belonging to one company can create an accessory record under another company by supplying a foreign company_id value in the API request body.\n\nThe issue occurs because the API create path mass-assigns request parameters directly to the Accessory model, and the Accessory model allows company_id to be mass assigned. Unlike the web controller, which uses Company::getIdForCurrentUser() to enforce the authenticated user\u2019s company context, the API controller does not apply equivalent tenant enforcement during accessory creation.\n\nAs a result, a Company A user can inject persistent accessory records into Company B. The injected records are then visible to Company B users as legitimate Company B inventory records. This breaks the integrity of company-scoped inventory data and represents a tenant isolation failure in the accessory creation flow.\n\n### Patches\nPatched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/dc8cbf4786bb38b260b4ae1723ec9e7f81d82fe5",
  "id": "GHSA-pwpj-p52h-q484",
  "modified": "2026-06-23T23:12:04Z",
  "published": "2026-06-23T23:12:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/security/advisories/GHSA-pwpj-p52h-q484"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/dc8cbf4786bb38b260b4ae1723ec9e7f81d82fe5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Snipe-IT API Vulnerable to Cross-Tenant Accessory Injection"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…