GHSA-PR59-H9PH-3FR8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 20:13 – Updated: 2026-06-15 20:13
VLAI
Summary
protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted JSON descriptor names
Details

Summary

A previous fix for unsafe name handling in pbjs static / static-module code generation was incomplete. Affected versions of protobufjs-cli could still emit unsafe JavaScript references when generating static output from crafted JSON descriptor input. The common case of parsing schemas from .proto files is not affected.

This is a bypass of GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9 / CVE-2026-44295.

Impact

An attacker who can provide or influence pre-parsed JSON descriptors passed to pbjs static code generation may be able to cause generated JavaScript output to contain attacker-controlled code.

The injected code may execute if the generated file is later executed or imported and an affected generated API path is invoked.

Preconditions

  • The application or build process must run pbjs static code generation on a pre-parsed JSON descriptor influenced by an attacker.
  • The generated JavaScript file must subsequently be executed or imported.
  • An affected generated API path must be invoked.

Workarounds

Do not run affected versions of pbjs static or static-module generation on untrusted JSON descriptors. If untrusted JSON descriptors must be accepted, validate descriptor-derived names before code generation and reject names that could not have been produced by parsing a valid .proto file. Running code generation in an isolated environment can reduce impact.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "protobufjs-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.4.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "protobufjs-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54271"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:13:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nA previous fix for unsafe name handling in `pbjs` static / static-module code generation was incomplete. Affected versions of `protobufjs-cli` could still emit unsafe JavaScript references when generating static output from crafted JSON descriptor input. The common case of parsing schemas from `.proto` files is not affected.\n\nThis is a bypass of GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9 / CVE-2026-44295.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can provide or influence pre-parsed JSON descriptors passed to `pbjs` static code generation may be able to cause generated JavaScript output to contain attacker-controlled code.\n\nThe injected code may execute if the generated file is later executed or imported and an affected generated API path is invoked.\n\n## Preconditions\n\n* The application or build process must run `pbjs` static code generation on a pre-parsed JSON descriptor influenced by an attacker.\n* The generated JavaScript file must subsequently be executed or imported.\n* An affected generated API path must be invoked.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nDo not run affected versions of `pbjs` static or static-module generation on untrusted JSON descriptors. If untrusted JSON descriptors must be accepted, validate descriptor-derived names before code generation and reject names that could not have been produced by parsing a valid `.proto` file. Running code generation in an isolated environment can reduce impact.",
  "id": "GHSA-pr59-h9ph-3fr8",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T20:13:54Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:13:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/protobufjs/protobuf.js/security/advisories/GHSA-pr59-h9ph-3fr8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/protobufjs/protobuf.js"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted JSON descriptor names"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…