ghsa-pmj2-vwxv-3w98
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-18 06:31
Modified
2022-12-22 15:30
Details

An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.0.11. Missing offset validation in drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/hif.c in the WILC1000 wireless driver can trigger an out-of-bounds read when parsing a Robust Security Network (RSN) information element from a Netlink packet.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-47520"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-125"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-18T06:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.0.11. Missing offset validation in drivers/net/wireless/microchip/wilc1000/hif.c in the WILC1000 wireless driver can trigger an out-of-bounds read when parsing a Robust Security Network (RSN) information element from a Netlink packet.",
  "id": "GHSA-pmj2-vwxv-3w98",
  "modified": "2022-12-22T15:30:21Z",
  "published": "2022-12-18T06:31:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-47520"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cd21d99e595ec1d8721e1058dcdd4f1f7de1d793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00031.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123153543.8568-2-philipturnbull@github.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230113-0007"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.