GHSA-MX5J-MP4F-G8JG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-31 19:38 – Updated: 2026-07-31 19:38
VLAI
Summary
Savon::Model evaluates WSDL operation names as Ruby source
Details

Impact

Savon::Model generated SOAP operation methods by interpolating operation names into Ruby source passed to module_eval. An attacker who can control the operation names of a WSDL, can inject Ruby code that executes in the application process. This affects only the .all_operations class method provided by Savon::Model to automatically register all operations provided by the WSDL. Configuring Savon::Model with trusted operation names via .operations is safe.

Patches

Patched in Savon 2.17.2.

Users should upgrade to 2.17.2 or later.

Workarounds

Avoid .all_operations for untrusted WSDL documents. Use .operations with trusted operation names instead.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "savon"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.9.8"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.17.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53510"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\n`Savon::Model` generated SOAP operation methods by interpolating operation names into Ruby source passed to `module_eval`. An attacker who can control the operation names of a WSDL, can inject Ruby code that executes in the application process. This affects only the `.all_operations` class method provided by `Savon::Model` to automatically register all operations provided by the WSDL. Configuring `Savon::Model` with trusted operation names via `.operations` is safe.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in Savon 2.17.2.\n\nUsers should upgrade to 2.17.2 or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nAvoid `.all_operations` for untrusted WSDL documents. Use `.operations` with trusted operation names instead.",
  "id": "GHSA-mx5j-mp4f-g8jg",
  "modified": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
  "published": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/security/advisories/GHSA-mx5j-mp4f-g8jg"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/commit/8f22eb543e7436f6247172c9be47e22792d375e9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/savon/CVE-2026-53510.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/releases/tag/v2.17.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord/SearchResults?query=CVE-2026-53510"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Savon::Model evaluates WSDL operation names as Ruby source"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…