GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-FX5J-QCQG-GRPF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-10 15:08 – Updated: 2026-09-10 15:08
VLAI
Summary
Excelize: Negative shared-string index causes panic in GetCellValue and GetRows
Details

Negative shared-string index causes panic in GetCellValue and GetRows

Summary

Excelize parses shared-string cell values with strconv.Atoi and checks only the upper bound before indexing the shared string slice. If an XLSX file contains a shared-string cell with <v>-1</v>, the parsed index is negative. The upper-bound check still passes (len(sharedStrings) > -1), and Excelize indexes sharedStrings[-1], causing a runtime panic.

This was reproduced on the current default branch commit 1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314 and the latest release tag v2.10.1 (5ad5ab3af0054c55bdce09f1530085600e9f2e45). The issue is independent from the row-bound allocation report, so I am reporting it separately.

Affected package

  • Package: github.com/xuri/excelize/v2
  • Tested affected versions: current default branch at 1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314, and release v2.10.1
  • Fixed version: none known at the time of this report

Impact

An attacker who can provide an XLSX file to an application using Excelize can trigger a process panic when the application reads the malicious cell through common APIs such as GetCellValue or GetRows. In services that parse untrusted spreadsheets without a panic recovery boundary, this can cause denial of service.

Root cause

For shared-string cells (t="s"), xlsxC.getValueFrom() parses the cell value as a shared-string index and only checks whether the index is below len(d.SI) before indexing:

xlsxSI, _ := strconv.Atoi(strings.TrimSpace(c.V))
if len(d.SI) > xlsxSI {
    return d.SI[xlsxSI].String(), nil
}

For xlsxSI == -1, len(d.SI) > -1 is true, so the code proceeds to index d.SI[-1] and panics.

Minimal worksheet payload

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<worksheet xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main">
  <sheetData>
    <row r="1"><c r="A1" t="s"><v>-1</v></c></row>
  </sheetData>
</worksheet>

The workbook also contains a normal sharedStrings.xml with one string (ok), so the failure is specifically due to accepting a negative index.

Reproduction

Calling GetCellValue("Sheet1", "A1") on the workbook panics:

== negative shared string GetCellValue ==
elapsed=0s alloc_delta=0MB
PANIC: runtime.boundsError runtime error: index out of range [-1]

Calling GetRows("Sheet1") on the same workbook also panics:

== negative shared string GetRows ==
elapsed=0s alloc_delta=0MB
PANIC: runtime.boundsError runtime error: index out of range [-1]

The same results were observed on current default branch commit 1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314 and on release v2.10.1.

Expected behavior

Malformed shared-string indices should be rejected or treated as missing/invalid string references without panicking.

Suggested remediation

Check both lower and upper bounds before indexing the shared string table. For example:

if xlsxSI >= 0 && xlsxSI < len(d.SI) {
    return d.SI[xlsxSI].String(), nil
}

Add regression tests for GetCellValue() and GetRows() on t="s" cells whose <v> value is negative.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/xuri/excelize/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.11.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/xuri/excelize"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59162"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-248",
      "CWE-755"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-10T15:08:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-10T17:17:02Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "# Negative shared-string index causes panic in GetCellValue and GetRows\n\n## Summary\n\nExcelize parses shared-string cell values with `strconv.Atoi` and checks only the upper bound before indexing the shared string slice. If an XLSX file contains a shared-string cell with `\u003cv\u003e-1\u003c/v\u003e`, the parsed index is negative. The upper-bound check still passes (`len(sharedStrings) \u003e -1`), and Excelize indexes `sharedStrings[-1]`, causing a runtime panic.\n\nThis was reproduced on the current default branch commit `1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314` and the latest release tag `v2.10.1` (`5ad5ab3af0054c55bdce09f1530085600e9f2e45`). The issue is independent from the row-bound allocation report, so I am reporting it separately.\n\n## Affected package\n\n- Package: `github.com/xuri/excelize/v2`\n- Tested affected versions: current default branch at `1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314`, and release `v2.10.1`\n- Fixed version: none known at the time of this report\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can provide an XLSX file to an application using Excelize can trigger a process panic when the application reads the malicious cell through common APIs such as `GetCellValue` or `GetRows`. In services that parse untrusted spreadsheets without a panic recovery boundary, this can cause denial of service.\n\n## Root cause\n\nFor shared-string cells (`t=\"s\"`), `xlsxC.getValueFrom()` parses the cell value as a shared-string index and only checks whether the index is below `len(d.SI)` before indexing:\n\n```go\nxlsxSI, _ := strconv.Atoi(strings.TrimSpace(c.V))\nif len(d.SI) \u003e xlsxSI {\n    return d.SI[xlsxSI].String(), nil\n}\n```\n\nFor `xlsxSI == -1`, `len(d.SI) \u003e -1` is true, so the code proceeds to index `d.SI[-1]` and panics.\n\n## Minimal worksheet payload\n\n```xml\n\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?\u003e\n\u003cworksheet xmlns=\"http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main\"\u003e\n  \u003csheetData\u003e\n    \u003crow r=\"1\"\u003e\u003cc r=\"A1\" t=\"s\"\u003e\u003cv\u003e-1\u003c/v\u003e\u003c/c\u003e\u003c/row\u003e\n  \u003c/sheetData\u003e\n\u003c/worksheet\u003e\n```\n\nThe workbook also contains a normal `sharedStrings.xml` with one string (`ok`), so the failure is specifically due to accepting a negative index.\n\n## Reproduction\n\nCalling `GetCellValue(\"Sheet1\", \"A1\")` on the workbook panics:\n\n```text\n== negative shared string GetCellValue ==\nelapsed=0s alloc_delta=0MB\nPANIC: runtime.boundsError runtime error: index out of range [-1]\n```\n\nCalling `GetRows(\"Sheet1\")` on the same workbook also panics:\n\n```text\n== negative shared string GetRows ==\nelapsed=0s alloc_delta=0MB\nPANIC: runtime.boundsError runtime error: index out of range [-1]\n```\n\nThe same results were observed on current default branch commit `1213a8bd7c5ab360554603ac5c995ccaf6eb4314` and on release `v2.10.1`.\n\n## Expected behavior\n\nMalformed shared-string indices should be rejected or treated as missing/invalid string references without panicking.\n\n## Suggested remediation\n\nCheck both lower and upper bounds before indexing the shared string table. For example:\n\n```go\nif xlsxSI \u003e= 0 \u0026\u0026 xlsxSI \u003c len(d.SI) {\n    return d.SI[xlsxSI].String(), nil\n}\n```\n\nAdd regression tests for `GetCellValue()` and `GetRows()` on `t=\"s\"` cells whose `\u003cv\u003e` value is negative.",
  "id": "GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf",
  "modified": "2026-09-10T15:08:53Z",
  "published": "2026-09-10T15:08:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/qax-os/excelize/security/advisories/GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59162"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/qax-os/excelize/pull/2331"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/qax-os/excelize/commit/93f0b3caed37f21ef5079e3259c6c21dcfe68453"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/qax-os/excelize"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/qax-os/excelize/releases/tag/v2.11.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Excelize: Negative shared-string index causes panic in GetCellValue and GetRows"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…