ghsa-c4h5-vgqh-28mg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:10
Modified
2022-05-14 01:10
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Details

An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 when a specially crafted SFTP packet is received from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2019-3858",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-125",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2019-03-21T21:29:00Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 when a specially crafted SFTP packet is received from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory.",
   id: "GHSA-c4h5-vgqh-28mg",
   modified: "2022-05-14T01:10:39Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T01:10:39Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-3858",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2136",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3858",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00032.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5DK6VO2CEUTAJFYIKWNZKEKYMYR3NO2O",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XCWEA5ZCLKRDUK62QVVYMFWLWKOPX3LO",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Apr/25",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Mar/25",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190327-0005",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.broadcom.com/support/fibre-channel-networking/security-advisories/brocade-security-advisory-2019-767",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4431",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.libssh2.org/CVE-2019-3858.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00040.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00003.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152136/Slackware-Security-Advisory-libssh2-Updates.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/03/18/3",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107485",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.