GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-6CRC-W8RH-CR5W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-07 15:33 – Updated: 2026-09-07 15:33
VLAI
Details

Affected versions of MISP permit unauthenticated or weakly constrained request paths to perform persistent work without adequate input bounds or rate limiting.

The users/forgot password-reset endpoint accepted an attacker-controlled email value without first imposing a reasonable length bound or validating its format. That value was then used to create an audit log entry and queue a password-reset job, causing the supplied value to be persisted more than once per request. The commit explicitly states that an unbounded unauthenticated request field was stored twice per call with no throttle.

The fix adds:

  • a maximum email input length of 1024 bytes;

  • email-format validation before persistent work;

  • a per-source pre-authentication request budget;

  • HTTP 429 responses when that budget is exceeded;

  • a 15-minute cooldown for API-access request emails;

  • POST-only handling and CSRF protection for the API-access request endpoint.

The new flood filter is specifically intended to limit persistent storage costs from anonymous requests such as password resets, registrations, and failed REST authentication attempts.

Version affected: ≤2.5.45

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-86452"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-07T14:16:56Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Affected versions of MISP permit unauthenticated or weakly constrained request paths to perform persistent work without adequate input bounds or rate limiting.\n\n\nThe users/forgot password-reset endpoint accepted an attacker-controlled email value without first imposing a reasonable length bound or validating its format. That value was then used to create an audit log entry and queue a password-reset job, causing the supplied value to be persisted more than once per request. The commit explicitly states that an unbounded unauthenticated request field was stored twice per call with no throttle.\n\n\nThe fix adds:\n\n\n\n  *  \na maximum email input length of 1024 bytes;\n\n\n  *  \nemail-format validation before persistent work;\n\n\n  *  \na per-source pre-authentication request budget;\n\n\n  *  \nHTTP 429 responses when that budget is exceeded;\n\n\n  *  \na 15-minute cooldown for API-access request emails;\n\n\n  *  \nPOST-only handling and CSRF protection for the API-access request endpoint.\n\n\n\n\n\nThe new flood filter is specifically intended to limit persistent storage costs from anonymous requests such as password resets, registrations, and failed REST authentication attempts.\n\nVersion affected: \u22642.5.45",
  "id": "GHSA-6crc-w8rh-cr5w",
  "modified": "2026-09-07T15:33:54Z",
  "published": "2026-09-07T15:33:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-86452"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/d75d899be"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…