ghsa-6749-m5cp-6cg7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-02-24 00:30
Modified
2025-04-08 17:53
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Cross-site Scripting in MLFlow
Details
Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.
This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.
The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "mlflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.10.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-27132"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-02-26T20:07:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-23T22:15:55Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.\n\nThis issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.\n\nThe vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.",
"id": "GHSA-6749-m5cp-6cg7",
"modified": "2025-04-08T17:53:18Z",
"published": "2024-02-24T00:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/10873"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mlflow/PYSEC-2024-240.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/mlflow-untrusted-recipe-xss-jfsa-2024-000631930"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-site Scripting in MLFlow"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…