GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-627W-X4JQ-G83V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-04 15:36 – Updated: 2026-09-04 15:36
VLAI
Details

LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner's agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-85621"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-345"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T15:17:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "LobeChat (LobeHub) 2.2.1 does not properly verify inbound chat-platform webhook signatures in the QQ and Feishu adapters. The webhook route (/api/agent/webhooks/:platform) is unauthenticated by design and delegates verification to each adapter; the QQ adapter performs no Ed25519 signature verification on dispatched message events, and the Feishu adapter only performs an optional static-token comparison that is skipped when no token is configured (the default) and is not a body signature. An unauthenticated attacker who knows the public webhook URL can POST forged inbound messages with an attacker-chosen sender identity and arbitrary text, causing the bot owner\u0027s agent to process attacker-controlled input and treat the attacker as a trusted platform sender.",
  "id": "GHSA-627w-x4jq-g83v",
  "modified": "2026-09-04T15:36:13Z",
  "published": "2026-09-04T15:36:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85621"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/issues/16538"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-feishu/src/adapter.ts"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/lobehub/lobehub/blob/v2.2.15/packages/chat-adapter-qq/src/adapter.ts"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lobechat-2.2.1-webhook-signature-verification-bypass-qq-feishu"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…