GHSA-5CXQ-44W6-64MX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-29 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-29 18:32A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the
received datagram.
Each receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long (nxd_tftp_client.c:1229,
1521, 1984). When the opcode is NX_TFTP_CODE_ERROR the message string is copied with a loop whose
only limits are the destination buffer and a NUL byte:
/* addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769 */
for (i = 0; (i < (sizeof(tftp_client_ptr -> nx_tftp_client_error_string) - 1)) && (*buffer_ptr); i++)
Nothing compares buffer_ptr against nx_packet_append_ptr. An ERROR packet that carries no
terminating NUL, which a server controls completely, walks the loop off the end of the packet until
it happens to meet a zero byte or fills the 64 byte destination.
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
READ of size 1 at 0x60d0000000c8 thread T4
#0 _nxd_tftp_client_file_read addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769
0x60d0000000c8 is 0 bytes to the right of 136-byte region
The open path has the same loop at :1327 and reports the same way. What is read lands in
nx_tftp_client_error_string, which the application is expected to display or log, so adjacent
packet pool memory ends up in whatever the device does with the error text.
Add (buffer_ptr < packet_ptr -> nx_packet_append_ptr) to the loop condition in all three paths.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-102721"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-29T18:17:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A TFTP server that answers with a short ERROR packet makes the client read up to 64 bytes past the\n\n\n\nreceived datagram.\n\n\n\nEach receive path checks only that the datagram is at least four bytes long (nxd_tftp_client.c:1229,\n\n\n\n1521, 1984). When the opcode is NX_TFTP_CODE_ERROR the message string is copied with a loop whose\n\n\n\nonly limits are the destination buffer and a NUL byte:\n\n\n\n```c\n\n\n\n/* addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769 */\n\n\n\nfor (i = 0; (i \u003c (sizeof(tftp_client_ptr -\u003e nx_tftp_client_error_string) - 1)) \u0026\u0026 (*buffer_ptr); i++)\n\n\n\n```\n\n\n\nNothing compares `buffer_ptr` against `nx_packet_append_ptr`. An ERROR packet that carries no\n\n\n\nterminating NUL, which a server controls completely, walks the loop off the end of the packet until\n\n\n\nit happens to meet a zero byte or fills the 64 byte destination.\n\n\n\n```\n\n\n\nERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow\n\n\n\nREAD of size 1 at 0x60d0000000c8 thread T4\n\n #0 _nxd_tftp_client_file_read addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_client.c:1769\n\n\n0x60d0000000c8 is 0 bytes to the right of 136-byte region\n\n\n\n```\n\n\n\nThe open path has the same loop at :1327 and reports the same way. What is read lands in\n\n\n\n`nx_tftp_client_error_string`, which the application is expected to display or log, so adjacent\n\n\n\npacket pool memory ends up in whatever the device does with the error text.\n\n\n\nAdd `(buffer_ptr \u003c packet_ptr -\u003e nx_packet_append_ptr)` to the loop condition in all three paths.",
"id": "GHSA-5cxq-44w6-64mx",
"modified": "2026-09-29T18:32:01Z",
"published": "2026-09-29T18:32:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-wvc9-5m9h-rvxc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102721"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.