GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-3PWW-VCVM-3GMJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-21 20:30 – Updated: 2026-07-21 20:30
VLAI
Summary
Gitea: API access token scope enforcement bypass on repository RSS/Atom feed endpoints leaks private repository commit data
Details

Summary

A Gitea personal access token (PAT) restricted to a non-repository scope (e.g. read:issue) can read the commit history of any private repository the token owner can access, via the repository RSS/Atom feed endpoints. The same token is correctly denied (403) on /raw, /media, /archive, and the contents API. It leaks commit SHAs, full commit messages (which frequently contain secrets and internal context), and committer name + email.

Details

Gitea enforces PAT scope on repository-content endpoints via checkDownloadTokenScope() (added in PR #37698, extended to the archive endpoint by the CVE-2026-20706 fix in 1.26.2). The RSS/Atom feed handlers were never included: they (a) opt into PAT auth via webAuth.AllowBasic, (b) serve private-repo content, but (c) never call checkDownloadTokenScope().

Affected handlers (all carry AllowBasic, none call the scope check): - RenderBranchFeedRSS/Atom - routers/web/feed/render.go (last 10 commits: SHA, title, full message, committer name + email) - ShowFileFeed - routers/web/feed/file.go (per-file commit history) - repo activity feed /{owner}/{repo}.rss / .atom - TagsListFeedRSS/Atom, ReleasesFeedRSS/Atom - routers/web/repo/release.go

Root cause: routers/web/web.go registers the feed routes with webAuth.AllowBasic so a PAT authenticates, but the unit-permission middleware only checks the user's access, not the token's scope. checkDownloadTokenScope (routers/web/repo/download.go and the archive Download in repo.go) exists to close exactly that gap and is absent from the feed handlers. Same class as the recently fixed download/archive bypasses (GHSA-cr4g-f395-h25h / CVE-2026-20706); the feeds are the surface those fixes missed.

PoC

Tested on gitea/gitea:1.26.2-rootless, confirmed present at main HEAD (9608cc2, 2026-06-13). 1. User carol owns private repo carol/priv with a commit (message: "add confidential secret"). 2. Create a PAT scoped to issues only, no repository scope: curl -u carol:PASS -X POST $HOST/api/v1/users/carol/tokens -d '{"name":"t","scopes":["read:issue"]}' 3. Scope-enforcing sibling correctly denies it: curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/raw/branch/main/secret.txt -> 403 4. The feed leaks private data with the same token: curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/rss/branch/main -> 200, returns <description>add confidential secret ... this commit message itself is sensitive</description>

Auth (same read:issue token) /raw/branch/main/secret.txt /rss/branch/main
anonymous - 404 (private repo hidden)
invalid token - 401
read:issue token (no repo scope) 403 (scope enforced) 200 + private commit data
full-scope token 200 200 (legitimate)

Impact

PATs are routinely issued narrowly and handed to third-party bots, CI jobs, or chat integrations that are meant to have no code access. This bypass lets such a token exfiltrate private-repository commit history (messages often hold secrets, ticket refs, internal context) and committer emails for every repository the owner can read. Confidentiality only; no integrity or availability impact. Preconditions: a valid PAT of any non-repository scope owned by a user with read access to the target private repo, and feeds enabled (Other.EnableFeed, default ON).

Suggested fix: call checkDownloadTokenScope(ctx) at the start of each feed handler (mirroring download.go). Longer-term, enforce repository token scope in a single route-group middleware wherever AllowBasic / AllowOAuth2 is set on a repo-content route, so the next added endpoint cannot miss it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.26.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "code.gitea.io/gitea"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.26.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-27761"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-21T20:30:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-03T21:16:58Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA Gitea personal access token (PAT) restricted to a non-repository scope (e.g. `read:issue`) can read the commit history of any private repository the token owner can access, via the repository RSS/Atom feed endpoints. The same token is correctly denied (403) on `/raw`, `/media`, `/archive`, and the contents API. It leaks commit SHAs, full commit messages (which frequently contain secrets and internal context), and committer name + email.\n\n### Details\nGitea enforces PAT scope on repository-content endpoints via `checkDownloadTokenScope()` (added in PR #37698, extended to the archive endpoint by the CVE-2026-20706 fix in 1.26.2). The RSS/Atom feed handlers were never included: they (a) opt into PAT auth via `webAuth.AllowBasic`, (b) serve private-repo content, but (c) never call `checkDownloadTokenScope()`.\n\nAffected handlers (all carry `AllowBasic`, none call the scope check):\n- `RenderBranchFeedRSS/Atom` - `routers/web/feed/render.go` (last 10 commits: SHA, title, full message, committer name + email)\n- `ShowFileFeed` - `routers/web/feed/file.go` (per-file commit history)\n- repo activity feed `/{owner}/{repo}.rss` / `.atom`\n- `TagsListFeedRSS/Atom`, `ReleasesFeedRSS/Atom` - `routers/web/repo/release.go`\n\nRoot cause: `routers/web/web.go` registers the feed routes with `webAuth.AllowBasic` so a PAT authenticates, but the unit-permission middleware only checks the user\u0027s access, not the token\u0027s scope. `checkDownloadTokenScope` (`routers/web/repo/download.go` and the archive `Download` in `repo.go`) exists to close exactly that gap and is absent from the feed handlers. Same class as the recently fixed download/archive bypasses (GHSA-cr4g-f395-h25h / CVE-2026-20706); the feeds are the surface those fixes missed.\n\n### PoC\nTested on `gitea/gitea:1.26.2-rootless`, confirmed present at `main` HEAD (9608cc2, 2026-06-13).\n1. User `carol` owns private repo `carol/priv` with a commit (message: \"add confidential secret\").\n2. Create a PAT scoped to issues only, no repository scope:\n   `curl -u carol:PASS -X POST $HOST/api/v1/users/carol/tokens -d \u0027{\"name\":\"t\",\"scopes\":[\"read:issue\"]}\u0027`\n3. Scope-enforcing sibling correctly denies it:\n   `curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/raw/branch/main/secret.txt`  -\u003e  403\n4. The feed leaks private data with the same token:\n   `curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/rss/branch/main`  -\u003e  200, returns\n   `\u003cdescription\u003eadd confidential secret ... this commit message itself is sensitive\u003c/description\u003e`\n\n| Auth (same read:issue token) | /raw/branch/main/secret.txt | /rss/branch/main |\n|---|---|---|\n| anonymous | - | 404 (private repo hidden) |\n| invalid token | - | 401 |\n| read:issue token (no repo scope) | 403 (scope enforced) | 200 + private commit data |\n| full-scope token | 200 | 200 (legitimate) |\n\n### Impact\nPATs are routinely issued narrowly and handed to third-party bots, CI jobs, or chat integrations that are meant to have no code access. This bypass lets such a token exfiltrate private-repository commit history (messages often hold secrets, ticket refs, internal context) and committer emails for every repository the owner can read. Confidentiality only; no integrity or availability impact. Preconditions: a valid PAT of any non-repository scope owned by a user with read access to the target private repo, and feeds enabled (`Other.EnableFeed`, default ON).\n\nSuggested fix: call `checkDownloadTokenScope(ctx)` at the start of each feed handler (mirroring `download.go`). Longer-term, enforce repository token scope in a single route-group middleware wherever `AllowBasic` / `AllowOAuth2` is set on a repo-content route, so the next added endpoint cannot miss it.",
  "id": "GHSA-3pww-vcvm-3gmj",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T20:30:11Z",
  "published": "2026-07-21T20:30:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-3pww-vcvm-3gmj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27761"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38147"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/9e84deb969aff5c1115c2984e41250f28c78451f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.26.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Gitea: API access token scope enforcement bypass on repository RSS/Atom feed endpoints leaks private repository commit data"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…