GCVE-1988-2026-0426

Vulnerability from gna-1988 – Published: 2026-10-02 04:57 – Updated: 2026-10-02 04:57
VLAI
Title
[0day-rubbish] Lantronix SGX5150 9.13.0.0R7 Authenticated FsBrowseClean command injection to root RCE (7.2)
Summary
0day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in Lantronix SGX5150, firmware 9.13.0.0R7, an IT/OT device server. Type: authenticated OS command injection (CWE-78) in the FsBrowseClean AJAX handler (0x5eea0) of /bin/ltrx_evo. A per-character filter blocks & | < ; ! $ backslash backtick and > but permits single quote, hash and newline. The path POST parameter is concatenated into /sbin/ltrx_usb_umount '%s' and run through /bin/sh -c as root. Sending path=x'%0a<cmd>%20%23 closes the quoted argument, opens a new shell line carrying the attacker's command, and comments out the trailing quote. The sink is blind. Scoring. This finding is dual-scored, and the conditional figure is NOT verified, which is stated rather than glossed: - PRIMARY, adopted, 7.2 High, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. PR:H rests on a genuine privileged web session being required. - CONDITIONAL, NOT verified, 9.8 Critical, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Applies only if the device serial number is obtainable, which would make the factory administrator password (recorded as serial-derived) no secret and the chain effectively unauthenticated. Serial recovery was NOT verified, and neither was the derivation itself. - SEPARATE secondary defect, 9.8 Critical, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reachable only where Digest authentication is configured: the Digest username extractor at 0xff838 verifies no nonce, realm or response, so a forged Authorization: Digest username="admin" header alone sets the identity to admin. This is independent of, and not additive to, the primary finding. Scoring note. The research record attached 8.8 to the PR:H vector. That vector computes to 7.2, not 8.8 under CVSS 3.1; this advisory recomputes from the vector printed beside it and reports 7.2, keeping 8.8 only as a labelled PR:L hypothetical (no lower-privileged account passing the filesystem write test was enumerated, so it is not claimed). Impact: root execution on an industrial gateway (ltrx_evo runs as root), giving full read of configuration and serial traffic, arbitrary root modification, persistent implantation, total availability loss and a pivot into segmented networks. Authentication: an authenticated web session satisfying IsGroupListWritable(identity, "filesystem"); the session precondition is static analysis, not dynamically verified. Verification boundary, stated plainly. No physical SGX5150 hardware was used at any point; verification is sink-faithful rather than full-stack. The character filter, the IseUSB gate and the sink construction were replicated in a chroot of the extracted ARM rootfs under qemu-arm-static, and the injected newline vector passed the product's own filter and ran as root via the product's own /bin/sh and marker owned by root:root. End-to-end HTTP against a live daemon was not achievable, because ltrx_evo requires NVRAM state, the encrypted factory.xcr device-serial material and a ZMQ IPC stack that could not be reconstructed outside the device. Full technical analysis and a reproducible proof-of-concept: https://0day-rubbish.com/blog/lantronix-sgx5150-fsbrowseclean-command-injection Project archive (ongoing disclosure series): https://github.com/Exploit-Garbage/0day-Rubbish The vendor has been notified through its published security contact. No vulnerability identifier has been assigned to this finding yet. -- 0day Rubbish Research Team disclosure () 0day-rubbish com https://0day-rubbish.com _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Lantronix SGX5150 Affected: unknown
guessed Create a notification for this product.

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "SGX5150",
          "vendor": "Lantronix",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unknown"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "disclosure via Fulldisclosure"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "0day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in Lantronix\nSGX5150, firmware 9.13.0.0R7, an IT/OT device server.\n\nType: authenticated OS command injection (CWE-78) in the FsBrowseClean AJAX\nhandler (0x5eea0) of /bin/ltrx_evo. A per-character filter blocks \u0026 | \u003c ; ! $\nbackslash backtick and \u003e but permits single quote, hash and newline. The path\nPOST parameter is concatenated into /sbin/ltrx_usb_umount \u0027%s\u0027 and run through\n/bin/sh -c as root. Sending path=x\u0027%0a\u003ccmd\u003e%20%23 closes the quoted argument,\nopens a new shell line carrying the attacker\u0027s command, and comments out the\ntrailing quote. The sink is blind.\n\nScoring. This finding is dual-scored, and the conditional figure is NOT\nverified, which is stated rather than glossed:\n- PRIMARY, adopted, 7.2 High, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.\n  PR:H rests on a genuine privileged web session being required.\n- CONDITIONAL, NOT verified, 9.8 Critical,\n  CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Applies only if the device\n  serial number is obtainable, which would make the factory administrator\n  password (recorded as serial-derived) no secret and the chain effectively\n  unauthenticated. Serial recovery was NOT verified, and neither was the\n  derivation itself.\n- SEPARATE secondary defect, 9.8 Critical, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reachable only where Digest \nauthentication is configured: the\n  Digest username extractor at 0xff838 verifies no nonce, realm or response, so a\n  forged Authorization: Digest username=\"admin\" header alone sets the identity to\n  admin. This is independent of, and not additive to, the primary finding.\n\nScoring note. The research record attached 8.8 to the PR:H vector. That vector\ncomputes to 7.2, not 8.8 under CVSS 3.1; this advisory recomputes from the vector\nprinted beside it and reports 7.2, keeping 8.8 only as a labelled PR:L\nhypothetical (no lower-privileged account passing the filesystem write test was\nenumerated, so it is not claimed).\n\nImpact: root execution on an industrial gateway (ltrx_evo runs as root), giving\nfull read of configuration and serial traffic, arbitrary root modification,\npersistent implantation, total availability loss and a pivot into segmented\nnetworks.\n\nAuthentication: an authenticated web session satisfying\nIsGroupListWritable(identity, \"filesystem\"); the session precondition is static\nanalysis, not dynamically verified.\n\nVerification boundary, stated plainly. No physical SGX5150 hardware was used at\nany point; verification is sink-faithful rather than full-stack. The character\nfilter, the IseUSB gate and the sink construction were replicated in a chroot of\nthe extracted ARM rootfs under qemu-arm-static, and the injected newline vector\npassed the product\u0027s own filter and ran as root via the product\u0027s own /bin/sh and\nmarker owned by root:root. End-to-end HTTP against a live daemon was not\nachievable, because ltrx_evo requires NVRAM state, the encrypted factory.xcr\ndevice-serial material and a ZMQ IPC stack that could not be reconstructed\noutside the device.\n\nFull technical analysis and a reproducible proof-of-concept:\n  https://0day-rubbish.com/blog/lantronix-sgx5150-fsbrowseclean-command-injection\n\nProject archive (ongoing disclosure series):\n  https://github.com/Exploit-Garbage/0day-Rubbish\n\nThe vendor has been notified through its published security contact. No vulnerability identifier has been assigned to\nthis finding yet.\n\n--\n0day Rubbish Research Team\ndisclosure () 0day-rubbish com\nhttps://0day-rubbish.com\n_______________________________________________\nSent through the Full Disclosure mailing list\nhttps://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure\nWeb Archives \u0026 RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-78",
              "description": "CWE-78",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T04:57:33Z",
        "orgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
        "shortName": "VULNARCHIVE"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description",
            "exploit"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Sep/74"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/74"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://0day-rubbish.com"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://0day-rubbish.com/blog/lantronix-sgx5150-fsbrowseclean-command-injection"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/Exploit-Garbage/0day-Rubbish"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/74"
        ],
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "[0day-rubbish] Lantronix SGX5150 9.13.0.0R7 Authenticated FsBrowseClean command injection to root RCE (7.2)",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "relationships": [],
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0426",
          "x_vulnarchive": {
            "archiveUrl": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Sep/74",
            "automated": true,
            "contentSha256": "d6670722639ae6e018f6457e300ad3ae04f054ec188213319fd7740f05872762",
            "evidenceScore": 11,
            "messageId": "",
            "originalUrl": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Sep/74",
            "policy": "vulnarchive-1",
            "sourceFormat": "text/html",
            "sourcePublishedAt": "2026-09-23T04:54:13Z"
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
    "assignerShortName": "VULNARCHIVE",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-02T04:57:33Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T04:57:33Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0426"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…